高危早期(T1)食管腺癌淋巴结转移发生率分析:单机构经验。

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Adrienne B. Shannon, Marwa A. Mohammed, Gregory Y. Lauwers, Luis R. Pena, Shaffer R. Mok, Andrew J. Sinnamon, Cyrillo R. Araujo, Jose M. Pimiento
{"title":"高危早期(T1)食管腺癌淋巴结转移发生率分析:单机构经验。","authors":"Adrienne B. Shannon,&nbsp;Marwa A. Mohammed,&nbsp;Gregory Y. Lauwers,&nbsp;Luis R. Pena,&nbsp;Shaffer R. Mok,&nbsp;Andrew J. Sinnamon,&nbsp;Cyrillo R. Araujo,&nbsp;Jose M. Pimiento","doi":"10.1002/jso.70050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>The incidence of lymph node metastasis (LNM) in early stage esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is up to 45% based on high-risk pathologic features. This risk has not been determined following external validation of staging and pathologic features.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Patients with clinical T1 EAC who underwent surgical resection at a single institution from 1999 to 2023 were included. Before inclusion, all retrospective data was validated by an external reviewer within the institution. Patients were categorized into low-risk and high-risk categories. Incidence of LNM was examined using univariate analyses. Survival analysis was performed with Kaplan Meier survival estimates.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>66 patients underwent esophagectomy and had multidisciplinary validation of staging and pathologic data; 28 (42.4%) patients had pT1b and 11/28 (39.3%) had SM3 tumors. The LNM rate was 10.6%; the incidence of LNM was higher for T1b compared to T1a (17.9%, <i>N</i> = 5/28 vs 5.3%, <i>N</i> = 2/38, p 0.10) tumors. Low-risk pT1a and high-risk pT1b patients had a LNM rates of 3.3% and 21.7%, respectively. Following a median follow-up of 46 months, there was no significant difference in overall survival and recurrence-free survival across risk stratification groups and comparing patients with and without LNM. Sensitivity for staging of T1b tumors was poor (40.9%, 50%, and 82.1%, respectively) for chest/abdominal CT, PET/CT, and EUS.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>T1 EAC patients retrospectively reviewed for multidisciplinary validation of staging and pathologic data have a LNM risk up to 21.7% when stratified by risk factors with a clinical trend toward worse survival. High-risk T1b patients may warrant neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy before surgical resection.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":"132 4","pages":"754-762"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of the Incidence of Lymph Node Metastases in High-Risk Early Stage (T1) Esophageal Adenocarcinomas: A Single-Institution Experience\",\"authors\":\"Adrienne B. Shannon,&nbsp;Marwa A. Mohammed,&nbsp;Gregory Y. Lauwers,&nbsp;Luis R. Pena,&nbsp;Shaffer R. Mok,&nbsp;Andrew J. Sinnamon,&nbsp;Cyrillo R. Araujo,&nbsp;Jose M. Pimiento\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jso.70050\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>The incidence of lymph node metastasis (LNM) in early stage esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is up to 45% based on high-risk pathologic features. This risk has not been determined following external validation of staging and pathologic features.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Patients with clinical T1 EAC who underwent surgical resection at a single institution from 1999 to 2023 were included. Before inclusion, all retrospective data was validated by an external reviewer within the institution. Patients were categorized into low-risk and high-risk categories. Incidence of LNM was examined using univariate analyses. Survival analysis was performed with Kaplan Meier survival estimates.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>66 patients underwent esophagectomy and had multidisciplinary validation of staging and pathologic data; 28 (42.4%) patients had pT1b and 11/28 (39.3%) had SM3 tumors. The LNM rate was 10.6%; the incidence of LNM was higher for T1b compared to T1a (17.9%, <i>N</i> = 5/28 vs 5.3%, <i>N</i> = 2/38, p 0.10) tumors. Low-risk pT1a and high-risk pT1b patients had a LNM rates of 3.3% and 21.7%, respectively. Following a median follow-up of 46 months, there was no significant difference in overall survival and recurrence-free survival across risk stratification groups and comparing patients with and without LNM. Sensitivity for staging of T1b tumors was poor (40.9%, 50%, and 82.1%, respectively) for chest/abdominal CT, PET/CT, and EUS.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>T1 EAC patients retrospectively reviewed for multidisciplinary validation of staging and pathologic data have a LNM risk up to 21.7% when stratified by risk factors with a clinical trend toward worse survival. High-risk T1b patients may warrant neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy before surgical resection.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17111,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Surgical Oncology\",\"volume\":\"132 4\",\"pages\":\"754-762\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Surgical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jso.70050\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jso.70050","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于高危病理特征,早期食管腺癌(EAC)的淋巴结转移(LNM)发生率高达45%。这种风险在外部验证分期和病理特征后尚未确定。方法:纳入1999年至2023年在同一医院接受手术切除的临床T1 EAC患者。在纳入之前,所有回顾性数据都由机构内部的外部审稿人验证。患者被分为低危和高危两类。采用单因素分析检查LNM的发生率。采用Kaplan Meier生存评估法进行生存分析。结果:66例患者行食管切除术,分期和病理资料多学科验证;28例(42.4%)患者有pT1b, 11/28例(39.3%)患者有SM3肿瘤。LNM率为10.6%;T1b肿瘤的LNM发生率高于T1a肿瘤(17.9%,N = 5/28 vs 5.3%, N = 2/38, p 0.10)。低危pT1a和高危pT1b患者的LNM率分别为3.3%和21.7%。在中位随访46个月后,不同风险分层组的总生存期和无复发生存期无显著差异,并比较有和没有LNM的患者。胸部/腹部CT、PET/CT和EUS对T1b肿瘤分期的敏感性较差(分别为40.9%、50%和82.1%)。结论:对T1例EAC患者进行多学科分期和病理资料的回顾性分析,按危险因素分层,LNM风险高达21.7%,临床趋势是生存期更差。高危T1b患者在手术切除前可能需要新辅助放化疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Analysis of the Incidence of Lymph Node Metastases in High-Risk Early Stage (T1) Esophageal Adenocarcinomas: A Single-Institution Experience

Analysis of the Incidence of Lymph Node Metastases in High-Risk Early Stage (T1) Esophageal Adenocarcinomas: A Single-Institution Experience

Analysis of the Incidence of Lymph Node Metastases in High-Risk Early Stage (T1) Esophageal Adenocarcinomas: A Single-Institution Experience

Introduction

The incidence of lymph node metastasis (LNM) in early stage esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is up to 45% based on high-risk pathologic features. This risk has not been determined following external validation of staging and pathologic features.

Methods

Patients with clinical T1 EAC who underwent surgical resection at a single institution from 1999 to 2023 were included. Before inclusion, all retrospective data was validated by an external reviewer within the institution. Patients were categorized into low-risk and high-risk categories. Incidence of LNM was examined using univariate analyses. Survival analysis was performed with Kaplan Meier survival estimates.

Results

66 patients underwent esophagectomy and had multidisciplinary validation of staging and pathologic data; 28 (42.4%) patients had pT1b and 11/28 (39.3%) had SM3 tumors. The LNM rate was 10.6%; the incidence of LNM was higher for T1b compared to T1a (17.9%, N = 5/28 vs 5.3%, N = 2/38, p 0.10) tumors. Low-risk pT1a and high-risk pT1b patients had a LNM rates of 3.3% and 21.7%, respectively. Following a median follow-up of 46 months, there was no significant difference in overall survival and recurrence-free survival across risk stratification groups and comparing patients with and without LNM. Sensitivity for staging of T1b tumors was poor (40.9%, 50%, and 82.1%, respectively) for chest/abdominal CT, PET/CT, and EUS.

Conclusion

T1 EAC patients retrospectively reviewed for multidisciplinary validation of staging and pathologic data have a LNM risk up to 21.7% when stratified by risk factors with a clinical trend toward worse survival. High-risk T1b patients may warrant neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy before surgical resection.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
367
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Oncology offers peer-reviewed, original papers in the field of surgical oncology and broadly related surgical sciences, including reports on experimental and laboratory studies. As an international journal, the editors encourage participation from leading surgeons around the world. The JSO is the representative journal for the World Federation of Surgical Oncology Societies. Publishing 16 issues in 2 volumes each year, the journal accepts Research Articles, in-depth Reviews of timely interest, Letters to the Editor, and invited Editorials. Guest Editors from the JSO Editorial Board oversee multiple special Seminars issues each year. These Seminars include multifaceted Reviews on a particular topic or current issue in surgical oncology, which are invited from experts in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信