梁龙总科系统发育和系统学的最新进展及新分类系统的建立和属的检索。

IF 1.6 3区 生物学 Q4 PARASITOLOGY
T J Achatz, V V Tkach
{"title":"梁龙总科系统发育和系统学的最新进展及新分类系统的建立和属的检索。","authors":"T J Achatz, V V Tkach","doi":"10.1017/S0022149X25100473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The superfamily Diplostomoidea Poirier, 1886 is a large, globally distributed group of digeneans characterized by the presence of a unique holdfast organ and parasitic in most major groups of vertebrates (birds, mammals, reptiles, fishes) as definitive hosts. A number of diplostomoideans are associated with diseases in their intermediate and, more rarely, definitive hosts. Prior to this work and upon the recent synonymization of the Brauninidae Wolf, 1903, the Diplostomoidea included 5 families: Bolbocephalodidae Strand, 1935; Cyathocotylidae Mühling, 1896; Diplostomidae Poirier, 1886; Proterodiplostomidae Dubois, 1936; and Strigeidae Railliet, 1919. The separation of these families was based primarily on the structure and shape of prosoma and holdfast organ as well as the presence/absence of cirrus sac and paraprostate. More rarely, distinguishing among families was based on life cycles and types of larval stages, excretory system or even host specificity. However, due to the inconsistent nature of most of morphological and biological characters across the Diplostomoidea and nearly universal lack of agreement on their relative value, the systematic history of the group has been extremely tumultuous, and none of many classification systems proposed over the last 140 years has become broadly accepted or supported by phylogenetic analyses. Extensive molecular phylogenetic studies of the Diplostomoidea in the last 15 years helped to partly improve the classification system and resolve multiple taxonomic questions. Notably, practically all molecular phylogenies have clearly demonstrated non-monophyly of the two largest families, the Diplostomidae and the Strigeidae and indicated it as systematic problem. We provide a brief overview of the history and current state of knowledge of diplostomoidean systematics and re-evaluate the classification system of the Diplostomoidea based on morphological and molecular evidence. We propose changes in the classification system that reconciles the traditional morphological and life cycle data with molecular phylogenies. The major element of the proposed classification system is the synonymization of the families Proterodiplostomidae and Strigeidae with the Diplostomidae as the only feasible way to resolve the problem of consistent non-monophyly of the latter two families and provide stability to the classification system.</p>","PeriodicalId":15928,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Helminthology","volume":"99 ","pages":"e87"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recent advances and current state of knowledge of phylogenetics and systematics of the Diplostomoidea with a proposal of a new classification system and a key to genera.\",\"authors\":\"T J Achatz, V V Tkach\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0022149X25100473\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The superfamily Diplostomoidea Poirier, 1886 is a large, globally distributed group of digeneans characterized by the presence of a unique holdfast organ and parasitic in most major groups of vertebrates (birds, mammals, reptiles, fishes) as definitive hosts. A number of diplostomoideans are associated with diseases in their intermediate and, more rarely, definitive hosts. Prior to this work and upon the recent synonymization of the Brauninidae Wolf, 1903, the Diplostomoidea included 5 families: Bolbocephalodidae Strand, 1935; Cyathocotylidae Mühling, 1896; Diplostomidae Poirier, 1886; Proterodiplostomidae Dubois, 1936; and Strigeidae Railliet, 1919. The separation of these families was based primarily on the structure and shape of prosoma and holdfast organ as well as the presence/absence of cirrus sac and paraprostate. More rarely, distinguishing among families was based on life cycles and types of larval stages, excretory system or even host specificity. However, due to the inconsistent nature of most of morphological and biological characters across the Diplostomoidea and nearly universal lack of agreement on their relative value, the systematic history of the group has been extremely tumultuous, and none of many classification systems proposed over the last 140 years has become broadly accepted or supported by phylogenetic analyses. Extensive molecular phylogenetic studies of the Diplostomoidea in the last 15 years helped to partly improve the classification system and resolve multiple taxonomic questions. Notably, practically all molecular phylogenies have clearly demonstrated non-monophyly of the two largest families, the Diplostomidae and the Strigeidae and indicated it as systematic problem. We provide a brief overview of the history and current state of knowledge of diplostomoidean systematics and re-evaluate the classification system of the Diplostomoidea based on morphological and molecular evidence. We propose changes in the classification system that reconciles the traditional morphological and life cycle data with molecular phylogenies. The major element of the proposed classification system is the synonymization of the families Proterodiplostomidae and Strigeidae with the Diplostomidae as the only feasible way to resolve the problem of consistent non-monophyly of the latter two families and provide stability to the classification system.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15928,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Helminthology\",\"volume\":\"99 \",\"pages\":\"e87\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Helminthology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022149X25100473\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PARASITOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Helminthology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022149X25100473","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PARASITOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Diplostomoidea Poirier超科,1886,是一个庞大的,全球分布的digeneans类群,其特征是在大多数主要脊椎动物(鸟类,哺乳动物,爬行动物,鱼类)中存在独特的固定器官和寄生虫作为最终宿主。许多双口纲动物与中间宿主的疾病有关,更罕见的是与最终宿主的疾病有关。在此工作之前,根据最近对狼蛛科(1903年)的同义化,梁龙总科包括5个科:Bolbocephalodidae Strand, 1935;Cyathocotylidae myhling, 1896;Poirier, 1886;杜波依斯,1936;和striigeidae Railliet, 1919年。这些科的分离主要基于原体和固定器官的结构和形状以及卷云囊和旁前列腺的存在/缺失。更罕见的是,根据生命周期和幼虫阶段类型、排泄系统甚至宿主特异性来区分不同的科。然而,由于大多数形态和生物学特征的不一致性,以及对它们的相对价值几乎普遍缺乏共识,该类群的系统历史一直非常混乱,在过去140年里提出的许多分类系统都没有得到系统发育分析的广泛接受或支持。近15年来对双口总科分子系统发育的广泛研究,在一定程度上完善了双口总科的分类体系,解决了许多分类学问题。值得注意的是,几乎所有的分子系统发育都清楚地显示了两个最大的科,双孔虫科和尾孔虫科的非单系性,并表明这是一个系统问题。本文综述了梁龙总科系统学研究的历史和现状,并从形态学和分子生物学的角度对梁龙总科的分类体系进行了重新评价。我们建议改变分类系统,使传统的形态和生命周期数据与分子系统发育相协调。本文提出的分类体系的主要内容是将原龙口科和尾龙口科同义化,以龙口科作为唯一可行的方法,以解决后两科的一致性非单系问题,并为分类体系提供稳定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Recent advances and current state of knowledge of phylogenetics and systematics of the Diplostomoidea with a proposal of a new classification system and a key to genera.

The superfamily Diplostomoidea Poirier, 1886 is a large, globally distributed group of digeneans characterized by the presence of a unique holdfast organ and parasitic in most major groups of vertebrates (birds, mammals, reptiles, fishes) as definitive hosts. A number of diplostomoideans are associated with diseases in their intermediate and, more rarely, definitive hosts. Prior to this work and upon the recent synonymization of the Brauninidae Wolf, 1903, the Diplostomoidea included 5 families: Bolbocephalodidae Strand, 1935; Cyathocotylidae Mühling, 1896; Diplostomidae Poirier, 1886; Proterodiplostomidae Dubois, 1936; and Strigeidae Railliet, 1919. The separation of these families was based primarily on the structure and shape of prosoma and holdfast organ as well as the presence/absence of cirrus sac and paraprostate. More rarely, distinguishing among families was based on life cycles and types of larval stages, excretory system or even host specificity. However, due to the inconsistent nature of most of morphological and biological characters across the Diplostomoidea and nearly universal lack of agreement on their relative value, the systematic history of the group has been extremely tumultuous, and none of many classification systems proposed over the last 140 years has become broadly accepted or supported by phylogenetic analyses. Extensive molecular phylogenetic studies of the Diplostomoidea in the last 15 years helped to partly improve the classification system and resolve multiple taxonomic questions. Notably, practically all molecular phylogenies have clearly demonstrated non-monophyly of the two largest families, the Diplostomidae and the Strigeidae and indicated it as systematic problem. We provide a brief overview of the history and current state of knowledge of diplostomoidean systematics and re-evaluate the classification system of the Diplostomoidea based on morphological and molecular evidence. We propose changes in the classification system that reconciles the traditional morphological and life cycle data with molecular phylogenies. The major element of the proposed classification system is the synonymization of the families Proterodiplostomidae and Strigeidae with the Diplostomidae as the only feasible way to resolve the problem of consistent non-monophyly of the latter two families and provide stability to the classification system.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Helminthology
Journal of Helminthology 生物-动物学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
127
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Helminthology publishes original papers and review articles on all aspects of pure and applied helminthology, particularly those helminth parasites of environmental health, medical or veterinary importance. Research papers on helminths in wildlife hosts, including plant and insect parasites, are also published along with taxonomic papers contributing to the systematics of a group. The journal will be of interest to academics and researchers involved in the fields of human and veterinary parasitology, public health, microbiology, ecology and biochemistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信