心脏T1和T2成像技术中的伪影-对可靠定量的影响。

IF 6.1 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Maximilian Fenski, Jan Gröschel, Peter Gatehouse, Christoph Kolbitsch, Jeanette Schulz-Menger
{"title":"心脏T1和T2成像技术中的伪影-对可靠定量的影响。","authors":"Maximilian Fenski, Jan Gröschel, Peter Gatehouse, Christoph Kolbitsch, Jeanette Schulz-Menger","doi":"10.1016/j.jocmr.2025.101934","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cardiac T1 and T2 mapping techniques are well-established methods for obtaining quantitative pixelwise representations of myocardial tissue properties. Mapping images are commonly evaluated quantitatively, and their resulting values play a crucial role in diagnosis and therapeutic decision making in various cardiac pathologies. Despite the validated effectiveness of these techniques, both methodological and patient-specific confounders must be considered when applying them in clinical and research settings. Artifacts - erroneous features within the MR image - can be misinterpreted as true anatomical structures or pathologies, potentially confounding quantitative analyses, conducted by both human readers and AI algorithms. Artifacts can arise from sources such as patient motion, metal objects, hardware constraints, patient-specific scanner adjustments (e.g. flip-angle calibration) and processing errors, particularly within the complex environment of cardiac imaging. While artifact sources in other CMR sequences are well documented, cardiac parametric mapping presents unique challenges due to its distinct image generation and quantitative assessment. This article provides an overview of artifacts encountered in cardiac T1 and T2 mapping, along with a concise explanation of their origins, aiming to raise awareness of their potential impact on clinical decision making. Future developments, including sequences designed to mitigate mapping artifacts, are also briefly discussed. A strong interaction between scientists and clinicians is needed to overcome these challenges and maintain the reliability of quantification results.</p>","PeriodicalId":15221,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance","volume":" ","pages":"101934"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artifacts in cardiac T1 and T2 mapping techniques - Influence on reliable quantification.\",\"authors\":\"Maximilian Fenski, Jan Gröschel, Peter Gatehouse, Christoph Kolbitsch, Jeanette Schulz-Menger\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jocmr.2025.101934\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Cardiac T1 and T2 mapping techniques are well-established methods for obtaining quantitative pixelwise representations of myocardial tissue properties. Mapping images are commonly evaluated quantitatively, and their resulting values play a crucial role in diagnosis and therapeutic decision making in various cardiac pathologies. Despite the validated effectiveness of these techniques, both methodological and patient-specific confounders must be considered when applying them in clinical and research settings. Artifacts - erroneous features within the MR image - can be misinterpreted as true anatomical structures or pathologies, potentially confounding quantitative analyses, conducted by both human readers and AI algorithms. Artifacts can arise from sources such as patient motion, metal objects, hardware constraints, patient-specific scanner adjustments (e.g. flip-angle calibration) and processing errors, particularly within the complex environment of cardiac imaging. While artifact sources in other CMR sequences are well documented, cardiac parametric mapping presents unique challenges due to its distinct image generation and quantitative assessment. This article provides an overview of artifacts encountered in cardiac T1 and T2 mapping, along with a concise explanation of their origins, aiming to raise awareness of their potential impact on clinical decision making. Future developments, including sequences designed to mitigate mapping artifacts, are also briefly discussed. A strong interaction between scientists and clinicians is needed to overcome these challenges and maintain the reliability of quantification results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15221,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"101934\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocmr.2025.101934\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocmr.2025.101934","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

心脏T1和T2映射技术是一种成熟的方法,用于获得心肌组织特性的定量像素表示。测绘图像通常被定量评估,其结果值在各种心脏病变的诊断和治疗决策中起着至关重要的作用。尽管这些技术的有效性得到了验证,但在临床和研究环境中应用这些技术时,必须考虑方法学和患者特异性混杂因素。伪影——磁共振图像中的错误特征——可能被误解为真实的解剖结构或病理,可能会混淆由人类读者和人工智能算法进行的定量分析。伪影可能来自患者运动、金属物体、硬件限制、患者特定扫描仪调整(例如翻转角度校准)和处理错误等来源,特别是在心脏成像的复杂环境中。虽然其他CMR序列中的伪影源有很好的记录,但由于其独特的图像生成和定量评估,心脏参数映射提出了独特的挑战。本文概述了在心脏T1和T2制图中遇到的伪影,并简要解释了它们的起源,旨在提高人们对它们对临床决策的潜在影响的认识。还简要讨论了未来的发展,包括设计用于减轻映射工件的序列。科学家和临床医生之间需要强有力的互动来克服这些挑战并保持量化结果的可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Artifacts in cardiac T1 and T2 mapping techniques - Influence on reliable quantification.

Cardiac T1 and T2 mapping techniques are well-established methods for obtaining quantitative pixelwise representations of myocardial tissue properties. Mapping images are commonly evaluated quantitatively, and their resulting values play a crucial role in diagnosis and therapeutic decision making in various cardiac pathologies. Despite the validated effectiveness of these techniques, both methodological and patient-specific confounders must be considered when applying them in clinical and research settings. Artifacts - erroneous features within the MR image - can be misinterpreted as true anatomical structures or pathologies, potentially confounding quantitative analyses, conducted by both human readers and AI algorithms. Artifacts can arise from sources such as patient motion, metal objects, hardware constraints, patient-specific scanner adjustments (e.g. flip-angle calibration) and processing errors, particularly within the complex environment of cardiac imaging. While artifact sources in other CMR sequences are well documented, cardiac parametric mapping presents unique challenges due to its distinct image generation and quantitative assessment. This article provides an overview of artifacts encountered in cardiac T1 and T2 mapping, along with a concise explanation of their origins, aiming to raise awareness of their potential impact on clinical decision making. Future developments, including sequences designed to mitigate mapping artifacts, are also briefly discussed. A strong interaction between scientists and clinicians is needed to overcome these challenges and maintain the reliability of quantification results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
61
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (JCMR) publishes high-quality articles on all aspects of basic, translational and clinical research on the design, development, manufacture, and evaluation of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) methods applied to the cardiovascular system. Topical areas include, but are not limited to: New applications of magnetic resonance to improve the diagnostic strategies, risk stratification, characterization and management of diseases affecting the cardiovascular system. New methods to enhance or accelerate image acquisition and data analysis. Results of multicenter, or larger single-center studies that provide insight into the utility of CMR. Basic biological perceptions derived by CMR methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信