Hoyol Jhang, Saerom Kim, Hyun-Tae Park, Ju-Young Shin, Seung-Ah Choe
{"title":"孕激素的使用与乳腺癌和妇科癌症的风险:一项基于全国人群的研究。","authors":"Hoyol Jhang, Saerom Kim, Hyun-Tae Park, Ju-Young Shin, Seung-Ah Choe","doi":"10.1002/ijgo.70424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate whether dienogest exposure is associated with the risk of breast, endometrial, or tubo-ovarian cancer in women with endometriosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this nationwide retrospective cohort study (January 2012 to December 2023), we used the Korean National Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service database. Women aged 20-49 years with endometriosis who received dienogest for at least 6 months were compared with an active control group treated with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists, with cohorts balanced by inverse probability of treatment weighting. Incident breast, endometrial, and tubo-ovarian cancers were ascertained, and adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1 887 957 women with endometriosis, 14 647 dienogest users and 181 587 GnRH agonist users met the eligibility criteria for the breast cancer cohort; sample sizes were similar for endometrial and tubo-ovarian analyses. Compared with GnRH agonists, dienogest use was not associated with increased risk of breast cancer (aHR 1.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.75-1.37), endometrial cancer (aHR 0.84, 95% CI 0.40-1.77), or tubo-ovarian cancer (aHR 0.92, 95% CI 0.30-2.80). Use of dienogest for 0.5-1.5 years was associated with a reduced breast cancer risk (aHR 0.72, 95% CI 0.53-0.99), whereas associations for longer durations were inconsistent.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dienogest use in women with endometriosis was not associated with higher or lower risks of breast, endometrial, or tubo-ovarian cancer compared with GnRH agonists, supporting its oncologic safety. Further longer-term studies are warranted to clarify duration-specific effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":14164,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dienogest use and the risk of breast and gynecologic cancers: A nationwide population-based study.\",\"authors\":\"Hoyol Jhang, Saerom Kim, Hyun-Tae Park, Ju-Young Shin, Seung-Ah Choe\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ijgo.70424\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate whether dienogest exposure is associated with the risk of breast, endometrial, or tubo-ovarian cancer in women with endometriosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this nationwide retrospective cohort study (January 2012 to December 2023), we used the Korean National Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service database. Women aged 20-49 years with endometriosis who received dienogest for at least 6 months were compared with an active control group treated with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists, with cohorts balanced by inverse probability of treatment weighting. Incident breast, endometrial, and tubo-ovarian cancers were ascertained, and adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1 887 957 women with endometriosis, 14 647 dienogest users and 181 587 GnRH agonist users met the eligibility criteria for the breast cancer cohort; sample sizes were similar for endometrial and tubo-ovarian analyses. Compared with GnRH agonists, dienogest use was not associated with increased risk of breast cancer (aHR 1.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.75-1.37), endometrial cancer (aHR 0.84, 95% CI 0.40-1.77), or tubo-ovarian cancer (aHR 0.92, 95% CI 0.30-2.80). Use of dienogest for 0.5-1.5 years was associated with a reduced breast cancer risk (aHR 0.72, 95% CI 0.53-0.99), whereas associations for longer durations were inconsistent.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dienogest use in women with endometriosis was not associated with higher or lower risks of breast, endometrial, or tubo-ovarian cancer compared with GnRH agonists, supporting its oncologic safety. Further longer-term studies are warranted to clarify duration-specific effects.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.70424\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.70424","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:评估子宫内膜异位症患者的孕激素暴露是否与乳腺癌、子宫内膜癌或输卵管卵巢癌的风险相关。方法:在这项全国回顾性队列研究(2012年1月至2023年12月)中,我们使用了韩国国民健康保险审查与评估服务数据库。年龄在20-49岁的子宫内膜异位症患者接受了至少6个月的dienogest治疗,与接受促性腺激素释放激素(GnRH)激动剂治疗的积极对照组进行比较,通过治疗加权的逆概率来平衡队列。确定乳腺癌、子宫内膜癌和输卵管卵巢癌的发生率,并使用Cox比例风险模型估计校正风险比(aHR)。结果:在1 887 957名子宫内膜异位症患者中,14 647名dienogest使用者和181 587名GnRH激动剂使用者符合乳腺癌队列的资格标准;子宫内膜和输卵管卵巢分析的样本量相似。与GnRH激动剂相比,dienogest的使用与乳腺癌(aHR 1.01, 95%可信区间[CI] 0.75-1.37)、子宫内膜癌(aHR 0.84, 95% CI 0.40-1.77)或输卵管卵巢癌(aHR 0.92, 95% CI 0.30-2.80)的风险增加无关。使用dienogest 0.5-1.5年与乳腺癌风险降低相关(aHR 0.72, 95% CI 0.53-0.99),而使用更长时间的相关性则不一致。结论:与GnRH激动剂相比,Dienogest用于子宫内膜异位症的女性与乳腺癌、子宫内膜癌或输卵管卵巢癌的风险无关,支持其肿瘤学安全性。有必要进行进一步的长期研究,以阐明特定时间的影响。
Dienogest use and the risk of breast and gynecologic cancers: A nationwide population-based study.
Objective: To evaluate whether dienogest exposure is associated with the risk of breast, endometrial, or tubo-ovarian cancer in women with endometriosis.
Methods: In this nationwide retrospective cohort study (January 2012 to December 2023), we used the Korean National Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service database. Women aged 20-49 years with endometriosis who received dienogest for at least 6 months were compared with an active control group treated with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists, with cohorts balanced by inverse probability of treatment weighting. Incident breast, endometrial, and tubo-ovarian cancers were ascertained, and adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models.
Results: Among 1 887 957 women with endometriosis, 14 647 dienogest users and 181 587 GnRH agonist users met the eligibility criteria for the breast cancer cohort; sample sizes were similar for endometrial and tubo-ovarian analyses. Compared with GnRH agonists, dienogest use was not associated with increased risk of breast cancer (aHR 1.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.75-1.37), endometrial cancer (aHR 0.84, 95% CI 0.40-1.77), or tubo-ovarian cancer (aHR 0.92, 95% CI 0.30-2.80). Use of dienogest for 0.5-1.5 years was associated with a reduced breast cancer risk (aHR 0.72, 95% CI 0.53-0.99), whereas associations for longer durations were inconsistent.
Conclusion: Dienogest use in women with endometriosis was not associated with higher or lower risks of breast, endometrial, or tubo-ovarian cancer compared with GnRH agonists, supporting its oncologic safety. Further longer-term studies are warranted to clarify duration-specific effects.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics publishes articles on all aspects of basic and clinical research in the fields of obstetrics and gynecology and related subjects, with emphasis on matters of worldwide interest.