芬兰家庭照护者的正式同伴支持经验:一种社会生态学的理解。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
International Journal of Integrated Care Pub Date : 2025-07-24 eCollection Date: 2025-07-01 DOI:10.5334/ijic.9104
Sarah Åkerman, Fredrica Nyqvist, Annika Wentjärvi, Laura Coll-Planas
{"title":"芬兰家庭照护者的正式同伴支持经验:一种社会生态学的理解。","authors":"Sarah Åkerman, Fredrica Nyqvist, Annika Wentjärvi, Laura Coll-Planas","doi":"10.5334/ijic.9104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Peer support programmes are important complementary support forms in integrated care. This study investigates formal peer support experiences among family caregivers in Finland by scrutinising multidimensional input and output mechanisms of emotional, informational, and appraisal support.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventeen family caregivers were interviewed through focus group and individual interviews. The qualitative data was analysed using a socioecological model for formal peer support.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The family caregivers described their caregiving situation as a source of pain enabling receiving emotional support from peer support participants with similar experiences - although norms of privacy and taboo hindered participation. Organisational aspects of programme delivery such as setting expectations, rules of confidentiality, environmental setting, group dynamics and leadership influenced experiences of informational and appraisal support. Overburden created barriers to receiving emotional and informational peer support. The participants wanted to influence society and contribute to other family caregivers through formal peer support - highlighting its socioecological nature.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Each attribute of peer support [emotional, informational, and appraisal support] formed its own, yet interlinked, ecosystem. Experiences of peer support are beyond programme delivery, and future studies could employ a socioecological framework when further delving into attributes of formal peer support among family caregivers in specific target groups and/or settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":14049,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Integrated Care","volume":"25 3","pages":"14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12292041/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Family Caregivers' Experiences of Formal Peer Support in a Finnish Setting - a Socioecological Understanding.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Åkerman, Fredrica Nyqvist, Annika Wentjärvi, Laura Coll-Planas\",\"doi\":\"10.5334/ijic.9104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Peer support programmes are important complementary support forms in integrated care. This study investigates formal peer support experiences among family caregivers in Finland by scrutinising multidimensional input and output mechanisms of emotional, informational, and appraisal support.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventeen family caregivers were interviewed through focus group and individual interviews. The qualitative data was analysed using a socioecological model for formal peer support.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The family caregivers described their caregiving situation as a source of pain enabling receiving emotional support from peer support participants with similar experiences - although norms of privacy and taboo hindered participation. Organisational aspects of programme delivery such as setting expectations, rules of confidentiality, environmental setting, group dynamics and leadership influenced experiences of informational and appraisal support. Overburden created barriers to receiving emotional and informational peer support. The participants wanted to influence society and contribute to other family caregivers through formal peer support - highlighting its socioecological nature.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Each attribute of peer support [emotional, informational, and appraisal support] formed its own, yet interlinked, ecosystem. Experiences of peer support are beyond programme delivery, and future studies could employ a socioecological framework when further delving into attributes of formal peer support among family caregivers in specific target groups and/or settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14049,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Integrated Care\",\"volume\":\"25 3\",\"pages\":\"14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12292041/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Integrated Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.9104\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Integrated Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.9104","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

同伴支持方案是综合护理中重要的补充支持形式。本研究通过审视情感、信息和评价支持的多维输入和输出机制,调查芬兰家庭照顾者的正式同伴支持体验。方法:采用焦点小组访谈和个别访谈相结合的方法对17名家庭照顾者进行访谈。使用正式同伴支持的社会生态学模型对定性数据进行分析。结果:家庭照顾者将他们的照顾情况描述为痛苦的来源,使他们能够从有类似经历的同伴支持参与者那里获得情感支持-尽管隐私规范和禁忌阻碍了参与。方案执行的组织方面,如设定期望、保密规则、环境环境、团体动态和领导等,影响了信息和评价支助的经验。过度负担造成了接受同伴情感和信息支持的障碍。参与者希望通过正式的同伴支持来影响社会并为其他家庭照顾者做出贡献-突出其社会生态性质。结论:同伴支持的每个属性(情感支持、信息支持和评价支持)形成了自己的、相互关联的生态系统。同伴支持的经验超出了项目交付的范围,未来的研究可以采用社会生态学框架,进一步深入研究特定目标群体和/或环境中家庭照顾者之间正式同伴支持的属性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Family Caregivers' Experiences of Formal Peer Support in a Finnish Setting - a Socioecological Understanding.

Introduction: Peer support programmes are important complementary support forms in integrated care. This study investigates formal peer support experiences among family caregivers in Finland by scrutinising multidimensional input and output mechanisms of emotional, informational, and appraisal support.

Methods: Seventeen family caregivers were interviewed through focus group and individual interviews. The qualitative data was analysed using a socioecological model for formal peer support.

Results: The family caregivers described their caregiving situation as a source of pain enabling receiving emotional support from peer support participants with similar experiences - although norms of privacy and taboo hindered participation. Organisational aspects of programme delivery such as setting expectations, rules of confidentiality, environmental setting, group dynamics and leadership influenced experiences of informational and appraisal support. Overburden created barriers to receiving emotional and informational peer support. The participants wanted to influence society and contribute to other family caregivers through formal peer support - highlighting its socioecological nature.

Conclusions: Each attribute of peer support [emotional, informational, and appraisal support] formed its own, yet interlinked, ecosystem. Experiences of peer support are beyond programme delivery, and future studies could employ a socioecological framework when further delving into attributes of formal peer support among family caregivers in specific target groups and/or settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Integrated Care
International Journal of Integrated Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
887
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Established in 2000, IJIC’s mission is to promote integrated care as a scientific discipline. IJIC’s primary purpose is to examine critically the policy and practice of integrated care and whether and how this has impacted on quality-of-care, user experiences, and cost-effectiveness. The journal regularly publishes conference supplements and special themed editions. To find out more contact Managing Editor, Susan Royer. The Journal is supported by the International Foundation for Integrated Care (IFIC).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信