探索慢性药物治疗与COVID-19临床结果之间关系的机器学习模型

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Berta Miró, Natalia Díaz González, Juan-Francisco Martínez-Cerdá, Clara Viñas-Bardolet, Alex Sánchez-Pla, Adrián Sánchez-Montalvá, Marta Miarons
{"title":"探索慢性药物治疗与COVID-19临床结果之间关系的机器学习模型","authors":"Berta Miró, Natalia Díaz González, Juan-Francisco Martínez-Cerdá, Clara Viñas-Bardolet, Alex Sánchez-Pla, Adrián Sánchez-Montalvá, Marta Miarons","doi":"10.1007/s11096-025-01955-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The impact of chronic medication on COVID-19 outcomes has been a topic of ongoing debate since the onset of the pandemic. Investigating how specific long-term treatments influence infection severity and prognosis is essential for optimising patient management and care.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the association between chronic medication and COVID-19 outcomes, using machine learning to identify key medication-related factors.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We analysed 137,835 COVID-19 patients in Catalonia (February-September 2020) using eXtreme Gradient Boosting to predict hospitalisation, ICU admission, and mortality. This was complemented by univariate logistic regression analyses and a sensitivity analysis focusing on diabetes, hypertension, and lipid disorders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants had a mean age of 53 (SD 20) years, with 57% female. The best model predicted mortality risk in 18 to 65-year-olds (AUCROC 0.89, CI 0.85-0.92). Key features identified included the number of prescribed drugs, systemic corticoids, 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase, and hypertension drugs. A sensitivity analysis identified that hypertensive participants over 65 taking angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) had lower mortality risk (OR 0.78 CI 0.68-0.92) compared to those on other antihypertensive medication (OR 0.8 CI 0.68-0.95). Treatment with inhibitors of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 was associated to higher mortality in participants aged 18-65, while metformin showed a protective effect in those over 65 (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.68-0.92).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Machine learning models effectively distinguished COVID-19 outcomes. Patients under ACEi or ARBs or biguanides should continue their prescribed medications, which may offer protection over alternative treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":13828,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A machine learning model exploring the relationship between chronic medication and COVID-19 clinical outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Berta Miró, Natalia Díaz González, Juan-Francisco Martínez-Cerdá, Clara Viñas-Bardolet, Alex Sánchez-Pla, Adrián Sánchez-Montalvá, Marta Miarons\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11096-025-01955-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The impact of chronic medication on COVID-19 outcomes has been a topic of ongoing debate since the onset of the pandemic. Investigating how specific long-term treatments influence infection severity and prognosis is essential for optimising patient management and care.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the association between chronic medication and COVID-19 outcomes, using machine learning to identify key medication-related factors.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We analysed 137,835 COVID-19 patients in Catalonia (February-September 2020) using eXtreme Gradient Boosting to predict hospitalisation, ICU admission, and mortality. This was complemented by univariate logistic regression analyses and a sensitivity analysis focusing on diabetes, hypertension, and lipid disorders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants had a mean age of 53 (SD 20) years, with 57% female. The best model predicted mortality risk in 18 to 65-year-olds (AUCROC 0.89, CI 0.85-0.92). Key features identified included the number of prescribed drugs, systemic corticoids, 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase, and hypertension drugs. A sensitivity analysis identified that hypertensive participants over 65 taking angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) had lower mortality risk (OR 0.78 CI 0.68-0.92) compared to those on other antihypertensive medication (OR 0.8 CI 0.68-0.95). Treatment with inhibitors of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 was associated to higher mortality in participants aged 18-65, while metformin showed a protective effect in those over 65 (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.68-0.92).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Machine learning models effectively distinguished COVID-19 outcomes. Patients under ACEi or ARBs or biguanides should continue their prescribed medications, which may offer protection over alternative treatments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13828,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-025-01955-7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-025-01955-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:自大流行开始以来,慢性药物治疗对COVID-19结局的影响一直是一个持续争论的话题。研究特定的长期治疗如何影响感染严重程度和预后对于优化患者管理和护理至关重要。目的:本研究旨在探讨慢性药物治疗与COVID-19结局之间的关系,利用机器学习识别关键药物相关因素。方法:我们分析了加泰罗尼亚(2020年2月至9月)的137,835例COVID-19患者,使用极端梯度增强预测住院、ICU住院和死亡率。通过单变量logistic回归分析和关注糖尿病、高血压和脂质紊乱的敏感性分析补充了这一研究结果。结果:参与者的平均年龄为53岁(SD 20)岁,其中57%为女性。最佳模型预测18 - 65岁人群的死亡风险(AUCROC 0.89, CI 0.85-0.92)。确定的主要特征包括处方药物数量、全身皮质激素、3-羟基-3-甲基戊二酰辅酶A (HMG-CoA)还原酶和高血压药物。一项敏感性分析发现,65岁以上的高血压患者服用血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂或血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂(ARBs)与服用其他抗高血压药物(or 0.8 CI 0.68-0.95)相比,死亡风险较低(or 0.78 CI 0.68-0.92)。在18-65岁的参与者中,使用二肽基肽酶4抑制剂治疗与较高的死亡率相关,而二甲双胍对65岁以上的参与者显示出保护作用(OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.68-0.92)。结论:机器学习模型可以有效区分COVID-19的结局。服用ACEi或arb或双胍类药物的患者应继续服用处方药,这可能比其他治疗方法提供保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A machine learning model exploring the relationship between chronic medication and COVID-19 clinical outcomes.

Background: The impact of chronic medication on COVID-19 outcomes has been a topic of ongoing debate since the onset of the pandemic. Investigating how specific long-term treatments influence infection severity and prognosis is essential for optimising patient management and care.

Aim: This study aimed to investigate the association between chronic medication and COVID-19 outcomes, using machine learning to identify key medication-related factors.

Method: We analysed 137,835 COVID-19 patients in Catalonia (February-September 2020) using eXtreme Gradient Boosting to predict hospitalisation, ICU admission, and mortality. This was complemented by univariate logistic regression analyses and a sensitivity analysis focusing on diabetes, hypertension, and lipid disorders.

Results: Participants had a mean age of 53 (SD 20) years, with 57% female. The best model predicted mortality risk in 18 to 65-year-olds (AUCROC 0.89, CI 0.85-0.92). Key features identified included the number of prescribed drugs, systemic corticoids, 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase, and hypertension drugs. A sensitivity analysis identified that hypertensive participants over 65 taking angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) had lower mortality risk (OR 0.78 CI 0.68-0.92) compared to those on other antihypertensive medication (OR 0.8 CI 0.68-0.95). Treatment with inhibitors of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 was associated to higher mortality in participants aged 18-65, while metformin showed a protective effect in those over 65 (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.68-0.92).

Conclusion: Machine learning models effectively distinguished COVID-19 outcomes. Patients under ACEi or ARBs or biguanides should continue their prescribed medications, which may offer protection over alternative treatments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
131
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy (IJCP) offers a platform for articles on research in Clinical Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Care and related practice-oriented subjects in the pharmaceutical sciences. IJCP is a bi-monthly, international, peer-reviewed journal that publishes original research data, new ideas and discussions on pharmacotherapy and outcome research, clinical pharmacy, pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacoeconomics, the clinical use of medicines, medical devices and laboratory tests, information on medicines and medical devices information, pharmacy services research, medication management, other clinical aspects of pharmacy. IJCP publishes original Research articles, Review articles , Short research reports, Commentaries, book reviews, and Letters to the Editor. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy is affiliated with the European Society of Clinical Pharmacy (ESCP). ESCP promotes practice and research in Clinical Pharmacy, especially in Europe. The general aim of the society is to advance education, practice and research in Clinical Pharmacy . Until 2010 the journal was called Pharmacy World & Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信