探索人类使用单克隆抗体对抗关键细菌:临床试验的范围综述。

IF 5.3 3区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Infectious Diseases and Therapy Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-25 DOI:10.1007/s40121-025-01195-2
Marco Piscaglia, Giovanni Scaglione, Camilla Genovese, Fabio Borgonovo, Fabio Brivio, Flavia Rampichini, Renata Grifantini, Alessandra Bandera, Andrea Gori, Marta Colaneri, Emanuele Palomba
{"title":"探索人类使用单克隆抗体对抗关键细菌:临床试验的范围综述。","authors":"Marco Piscaglia, Giovanni Scaglione, Camilla Genovese, Fabio Borgonovo, Fabio Brivio, Flavia Rampichini, Renata Grifantini, Alessandra Bandera, Andrea Gori, Marta Colaneri, Emanuele Palomba","doi":"10.1007/s40121-025-01195-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The global spread of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs), particularly the World Health Organization (WHO) priority pathogens, poses a major challenge to infection treatment, necessitating alternative therapeutic strategies. Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have emerged as a potential approach. This review evaluates the clinical efficacy, safety, and limitations of mAbs targeting critical bacterial pathogens, analyzing factors influencing therapeutic outcomes, and proposing strategies to optimize their clinical application.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive analysis of clinical trials investigating antibacterial mAbs was conducted. The review assessed key factors influencing therapeutic outcomes, including trial design, patient heterogeneity, and pharmacokinetics (PK). Comparative analysis was performed to examine differences in efficacy, safety, and limitations across studies. A structured risk of bias assessment was performed using Cochrane Methods' tools.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Owing to the low number of studies against MDROs, all trials about mAbs targeting Staphylococcus aureus (SA) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) were included, disregarding resistance profiles. Generally, clinical trials evaluating antibacterial mAbs have shown preliminary evidence. For PA, panobacumab exhibited a favorable safety profile but lacked clear clinical benefits, showing a good survival rate but in a small uncontrolled trial. Rivabazumab reduced bacterial colonization, but did not significantly lower pneumonia incidence. Gremubamab was well tolerated but failed to meet efficacy endpoints. For SA, tosatoxumab and suvratoxumab failed to show statistical significance but may have potential benefits for pneumonia, although phase III trials are needed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Inconsistent efficacy may stem from complex host-pathogen interactions, biofilm formation, and variations in patient immune status. Future trials should investigate early mAb administration, stratified patient selection, and standardized antibiotic coadministration, poorly addressed thus far. Optimized dosing and mAb combination regimens are promising yet unexplored paths, while high production costs and regulatory issues remain a significant barrier.</p>","PeriodicalId":13592,"journal":{"name":"Infectious Diseases and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1619-1647"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12339841/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring Human Use of Monoclonal Antibodies Against Critical Bacteria: A Scoping Review of Clinical Trials.\",\"authors\":\"Marco Piscaglia, Giovanni Scaglione, Camilla Genovese, Fabio Borgonovo, Fabio Brivio, Flavia Rampichini, Renata Grifantini, Alessandra Bandera, Andrea Gori, Marta Colaneri, Emanuele Palomba\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40121-025-01195-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The global spread of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs), particularly the World Health Organization (WHO) priority pathogens, poses a major challenge to infection treatment, necessitating alternative therapeutic strategies. Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have emerged as a potential approach. This review evaluates the clinical efficacy, safety, and limitations of mAbs targeting critical bacterial pathogens, analyzing factors influencing therapeutic outcomes, and proposing strategies to optimize their clinical application.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive analysis of clinical trials investigating antibacterial mAbs was conducted. The review assessed key factors influencing therapeutic outcomes, including trial design, patient heterogeneity, and pharmacokinetics (PK). Comparative analysis was performed to examine differences in efficacy, safety, and limitations across studies. A structured risk of bias assessment was performed using Cochrane Methods' tools.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Owing to the low number of studies against MDROs, all trials about mAbs targeting Staphylococcus aureus (SA) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) were included, disregarding resistance profiles. Generally, clinical trials evaluating antibacterial mAbs have shown preliminary evidence. For PA, panobacumab exhibited a favorable safety profile but lacked clear clinical benefits, showing a good survival rate but in a small uncontrolled trial. Rivabazumab reduced bacterial colonization, but did not significantly lower pneumonia incidence. Gremubamab was well tolerated but failed to meet efficacy endpoints. For SA, tosatoxumab and suvratoxumab failed to show statistical significance but may have potential benefits for pneumonia, although phase III trials are needed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Inconsistent efficacy may stem from complex host-pathogen interactions, biofilm formation, and variations in patient immune status. Future trials should investigate early mAb administration, stratified patient selection, and standardized antibiotic coadministration, poorly addressed thus far. Optimized dosing and mAb combination regimens are promising yet unexplored paths, while high production costs and regulatory issues remain a significant barrier.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13592,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infectious Diseases and Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1619-1647\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12339841/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infectious Diseases and Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40121-025-01195-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infectious Diseases and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40121-025-01195-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:耐多药生物(mdro)的全球传播,特别是世界卫生组织(WHO)的重点病原体,对感染治疗构成了重大挑战,需要替代治疗策略。单克隆抗体(mab)已成为一种潜在的方法。本文综述了针对关键病原菌的单克隆抗体的临床疗效、安全性和局限性,分析了影响治疗结果的因素,并提出了优化其临床应用的策略。方法:对抗菌单抗的临床试验进行综合分析。该综述评估了影响治疗结果的关键因素,包括试验设计、患者异质性和药代动力学(PK)。进行比较分析以检查不同研究的疗效、安全性和局限性的差异。使用Cochrane方法工具进行结构化偏倚风险评估。结果:由于针对MDROs的研究较少,所有针对金黄色葡萄球菌(SA)和铜绿假单胞菌(PA)的单抗试验均被纳入,不考虑耐药谱。一般来说,评估抗菌单抗的临床试验已经显示出初步证据。对于PA, panobumab显示出良好的安全性,但缺乏明确的临床益处,但在小型非对照试验中显示出良好的生存率。利伐单抗减少了细菌定植,但没有显著降低肺炎发病率。Gremubamab耐受性良好,但未能达到疗效终点。对于SA, tosatoxumab和suratoxumab未能显示出统计学意义,但可能对肺炎有潜在的益处,尽管需要进行III期试验。结论:不一致的疗效可能源于复杂的宿主-病原体相互作用、生物膜形成和患者免疫状态的变化。未来的试验应研究早期单抗给药、分层患者选择和标准化抗生素联合给药,这些问题迄今尚未得到解决。优化剂量和单抗联合方案是有前途的,但尚未开发的途径,而高生产成本和监管问题仍然是重大障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Exploring Human Use of Monoclonal Antibodies Against Critical Bacteria: A Scoping Review of Clinical Trials.

Exploring Human Use of Monoclonal Antibodies Against Critical Bacteria: A Scoping Review of Clinical Trials.

Introduction: The global spread of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs), particularly the World Health Organization (WHO) priority pathogens, poses a major challenge to infection treatment, necessitating alternative therapeutic strategies. Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have emerged as a potential approach. This review evaluates the clinical efficacy, safety, and limitations of mAbs targeting critical bacterial pathogens, analyzing factors influencing therapeutic outcomes, and proposing strategies to optimize their clinical application.

Methods: A comprehensive analysis of clinical trials investigating antibacterial mAbs was conducted. The review assessed key factors influencing therapeutic outcomes, including trial design, patient heterogeneity, and pharmacokinetics (PK). Comparative analysis was performed to examine differences in efficacy, safety, and limitations across studies. A structured risk of bias assessment was performed using Cochrane Methods' tools.

Results: Owing to the low number of studies against MDROs, all trials about mAbs targeting Staphylococcus aureus (SA) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) were included, disregarding resistance profiles. Generally, clinical trials evaluating antibacterial mAbs have shown preliminary evidence. For PA, panobacumab exhibited a favorable safety profile but lacked clear clinical benefits, showing a good survival rate but in a small uncontrolled trial. Rivabazumab reduced bacterial colonization, but did not significantly lower pneumonia incidence. Gremubamab was well tolerated but failed to meet efficacy endpoints. For SA, tosatoxumab and suvratoxumab failed to show statistical significance but may have potential benefits for pneumonia, although phase III trials are needed.

Conclusions: Inconsistent efficacy may stem from complex host-pathogen interactions, biofilm formation, and variations in patient immune status. Future trials should investigate early mAb administration, stratified patient selection, and standardized antibiotic coadministration, poorly addressed thus far. Optimized dosing and mAb combination regimens are promising yet unexplored paths, while high production costs and regulatory issues remain a significant barrier.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Infectious Diseases and Therapy
Infectious Diseases and Therapy Medicine-Microbiology (medical)
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
1.90%
发文量
136
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Infectious Diseases and Therapy is an international, open access, peer-reviewed, rapid publication journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of infectious disease therapies and interventions, including vaccines and devices. Studies relating to diagnostic products and diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, epidemiology, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged. Areas of focus include, but are not limited to, bacterial and fungal infections, viral infections (including HIV/AIDS and hepatitis), parasitological diseases, tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases, vaccinations and other interventions, and drug-resistance, chronic infections, epidemiology and tropical, emergent, pediatric, dermal and sexually-transmitted diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信