{"title":"不切除周围虹膜的DMEK疗效及文献回顾。","authors":"Anchal Arora, Srikant Kumar Sahu, Umashankar Barik, Priyadarshini Parida, Sunita Chaurasia, Smruti Rekha Priyadarshini, Sujata Das","doi":"10.4103/IJO.IJO_1052_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To enlist the results of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) without peripheral iridotomy (PI) and to analyze the risks and benefits associated with this approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medical records of 57 patients who underwent DMEK without PI between January 2019 and March 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. The primary outcome was the incidence of pupillary block (PB), and the secondary outcomes were graft detachment, rebubbling rates, and best-corrected logMAR distance visual acuity (BCDVA) at 6 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median age (interquartile range (IQR)) of the participants was 66 years (range: 61-73 years). The median (IQR) BCDVA 6 months post-DMEK was 0.18 (IQR: 0.1-0.3); 82% of eyes achieved a BCDVA of >20/40. PB due to air bubble migration into the posterior chamber, resulting in appositional angle closure, was seen in 2/57 (3.5%) cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DMEK without PI gives comparable long-term results regarding visual acuity and graft survival. Despite the predisposition of Caucasian eyes to angle-closure glaucoma, the incidence of PB was comparable to eyes undergoing DMEK with PI. Therefore, avoiding this step can save surgical time and prevent PI-related complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":13329,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"73 8","pages":"1197-1201"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12416590/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of DMEK without peripheral iridotomy and a review of the literature.\",\"authors\":\"Anchal Arora, Srikant Kumar Sahu, Umashankar Barik, Priyadarshini Parida, Sunita Chaurasia, Smruti Rekha Priyadarshini, Sujata Das\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/IJO.IJO_1052_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To enlist the results of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) without peripheral iridotomy (PI) and to analyze the risks and benefits associated with this approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medical records of 57 patients who underwent DMEK without PI between January 2019 and March 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. The primary outcome was the incidence of pupillary block (PB), and the secondary outcomes were graft detachment, rebubbling rates, and best-corrected logMAR distance visual acuity (BCDVA) at 6 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median age (interquartile range (IQR)) of the participants was 66 years (range: 61-73 years). The median (IQR) BCDVA 6 months post-DMEK was 0.18 (IQR: 0.1-0.3); 82% of eyes achieved a BCDVA of >20/40. PB due to air bubble migration into the posterior chamber, resulting in appositional angle closure, was seen in 2/57 (3.5%) cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DMEK without PI gives comparable long-term results regarding visual acuity and graft survival. Despite the predisposition of Caucasian eyes to angle-closure glaucoma, the incidence of PB was comparable to eyes undergoing DMEK with PI. Therefore, avoiding this step can save surgical time and prevent PI-related complications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13329,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"73 8\",\"pages\":\"1197-1201\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12416590/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/IJO.IJO_1052_24\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/IJO.IJO_1052_24","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Outcomes of DMEK without peripheral iridotomy and a review of the literature.
Purpose: To enlist the results of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) without peripheral iridotomy (PI) and to analyze the risks and benefits associated with this approach.
Methods: Medical records of 57 patients who underwent DMEK without PI between January 2019 and March 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. The primary outcome was the incidence of pupillary block (PB), and the secondary outcomes were graft detachment, rebubbling rates, and best-corrected logMAR distance visual acuity (BCDVA) at 6 months.
Results: The median age (interquartile range (IQR)) of the participants was 66 years (range: 61-73 years). The median (IQR) BCDVA 6 months post-DMEK was 0.18 (IQR: 0.1-0.3); 82% of eyes achieved a BCDVA of >20/40. PB due to air bubble migration into the posterior chamber, resulting in appositional angle closure, was seen in 2/57 (3.5%) cases.
Conclusion: DMEK without PI gives comparable long-term results regarding visual acuity and graft survival. Despite the predisposition of Caucasian eyes to angle-closure glaucoma, the incidence of PB was comparable to eyes undergoing DMEK with PI. Therefore, avoiding this step can save surgical time and prevent PI-related complications.
期刊介绍:
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology covers clinical, experimental, basic science research and translational research studies related to medical, ethical and social issues in field of ophthalmology and vision science. Articles with clinical interest and implications will be given preference.