子痫前期诊断和诊断国际临床实践指南的异同:范围综述。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Hypertension in Pregnancy Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-28 DOI:10.1080/10641955.2025.2532489
Mónica Chamillard, Virginia Díaz, Celina Gialdini, Julia Pasquale, Anayda Portela, Edgardo Abalos
{"title":"子痫前期诊断和诊断国际临床实践指南的异同:范围综述。","authors":"Mónica Chamillard, Virginia Díaz, Celina Gialdini, Julia Pasquale, Anayda Portela, Edgardo Abalos","doi":"10.1080/10641955.2025.2532489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Preeclampsia is a leading cause of maternal and newborn deaths. Traditionally characterized by high-blood pressure and proteinuria, organ and placental dysfunction were later proposed in some clinical practice guidelines as additional components for its definition. Variability in diagnostic criteria across international guidelines could be a barrier to harmonized and equitable care in different settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed current relevant clinical practice guidelines to identify similarities and differences in recommendations related to the definition and diagnosis of preeclampsia, and their supporting evidence. We also reviewed additional systematic reviews related to the diagnosis of preeclampsia. We searched different databases and websites of international and professional organizations for guidelines published or updated from 2014 to 2024. We searched databases to identify additional systematic reviews on preeclampsia diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen guidelines from 11 organizations were identified with 11 systematic reviews supporting evidence on the diagnosis of preeclampsia. We found 21 additional systematic reviews, not included in these guidelines.</p><p><strong>Discusion: </strong>There is agreement for hypertension and proteinuria for the diagnosis of preeclampsia, without a uniform consensus on methods and devices for their assessment. Organ dysfunction is considered in eight guidelines and placental dysfunction in four, with some disagreements on their usefulness, and the methods and tools for their measurement. Few guidelines support their recommendations on preeclampsia diagnosis with systematic reviews.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Consensus in preeclampsia definition is needed to guide not only clinical practice but also future research and policy, particularly in global health contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":13054,"journal":{"name":"Hypertension in Pregnancy","volume":"44 1","pages":"2532489"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Similarities and differences in international clinical practice guidelines for preeclampsia diagnosis and diagnostics: a scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Mónica Chamillard, Virginia Díaz, Celina Gialdini, Julia Pasquale, Anayda Portela, Edgardo Abalos\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10641955.2025.2532489\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Preeclampsia is a leading cause of maternal and newborn deaths. Traditionally characterized by high-blood pressure and proteinuria, organ and placental dysfunction were later proposed in some clinical practice guidelines as additional components for its definition. Variability in diagnostic criteria across international guidelines could be a barrier to harmonized and equitable care in different settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed current relevant clinical practice guidelines to identify similarities and differences in recommendations related to the definition and diagnosis of preeclampsia, and their supporting evidence. We also reviewed additional systematic reviews related to the diagnosis of preeclampsia. We searched different databases and websites of international and professional organizations for guidelines published or updated from 2014 to 2024. We searched databases to identify additional systematic reviews on preeclampsia diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen guidelines from 11 organizations were identified with 11 systematic reviews supporting evidence on the diagnosis of preeclampsia. We found 21 additional systematic reviews, not included in these guidelines.</p><p><strong>Discusion: </strong>There is agreement for hypertension and proteinuria for the diagnosis of preeclampsia, without a uniform consensus on methods and devices for their assessment. Organ dysfunction is considered in eight guidelines and placental dysfunction in four, with some disagreements on their usefulness, and the methods and tools for their measurement. Few guidelines support their recommendations on preeclampsia diagnosis with systematic reviews.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Consensus in preeclampsia definition is needed to guide not only clinical practice but also future research and policy, particularly in global health contexts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13054,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hypertension in Pregnancy\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"2532489\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hypertension in Pregnancy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10641955.2025.2532489\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hypertension in Pregnancy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10641955.2025.2532489","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

子痫前期是孕产妇和新生儿死亡的主要原因。传统上以高血压和蛋白尿为特征,后来在一些临床实践指南中提出了器官和胎盘功能障碍作为其定义的附加成分。国际指南中诊断标准的差异可能成为在不同环境中协调和公平护理的障碍。方法:我们回顾了当前相关的临床实践指南,以确定与子痫前期定义和诊断相关的建议的异同及其支持证据。我们还回顾了与子痫前期诊断相关的其他系统综述。我们检索了国际和专业组织的不同数据库和网站,以获取2014年至2024年发布或更新的指南。我们检索数据库以确定关于子痫前期诊断的其他系统评价。结果:来自11个组织的15个指南与11个支持先兆子痫诊断证据的系统评价被确定。我们发现了21个额外的系统评价,没有包括在这些指南中。讨论:高血压和蛋白尿诊断子痫前期是一致的,但在评估方法和设备上没有统一的共识。器官功能障碍在8个指南中被考虑,胎盘功能障碍在4个指南中被考虑,在它们的有用性、测量方法和工具上存在一些分歧。很少有指南支持他们对先兆子痫诊断的建议。结论:需要对子痫前期定义达成共识,不仅指导临床实践,而且指导未来的研究和政策,特别是在全球卫生背景下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Similarities and differences in international clinical practice guidelines for preeclampsia diagnosis and diagnostics: a scoping review.

Introduction: Preeclampsia is a leading cause of maternal and newborn deaths. Traditionally characterized by high-blood pressure and proteinuria, organ and placental dysfunction were later proposed in some clinical practice guidelines as additional components for its definition. Variability in diagnostic criteria across international guidelines could be a barrier to harmonized and equitable care in different settings.

Methods: We reviewed current relevant clinical practice guidelines to identify similarities and differences in recommendations related to the definition and diagnosis of preeclampsia, and their supporting evidence. We also reviewed additional systematic reviews related to the diagnosis of preeclampsia. We searched different databases and websites of international and professional organizations for guidelines published or updated from 2014 to 2024. We searched databases to identify additional systematic reviews on preeclampsia diagnosis.

Results: Fifteen guidelines from 11 organizations were identified with 11 systematic reviews supporting evidence on the diagnosis of preeclampsia. We found 21 additional systematic reviews, not included in these guidelines.

Discusion: There is agreement for hypertension and proteinuria for the diagnosis of preeclampsia, without a uniform consensus on methods and devices for their assessment. Organ dysfunction is considered in eight guidelines and placental dysfunction in four, with some disagreements on their usefulness, and the methods and tools for their measurement. Few guidelines support their recommendations on preeclampsia diagnosis with systematic reviews.

Conclusion: Consensus in preeclampsia definition is needed to guide not only clinical practice but also future research and policy, particularly in global health contexts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hypertension in Pregnancy
Hypertension in Pregnancy 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Hypertension in Pregnancy is a refereed journal in the English language which publishes data pertaining to human and animal hypertension during gestation. Contributions concerning physiology of circulatory control, pathophysiology, methodology, therapy or any other material relevant to the relationship between elevated blood pressure and pregnancy are acceptable. Published material includes original articles, clinical trials, solicited and unsolicited reviews, editorials, letters, and other material deemed pertinent by the editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信