Isadora Alonso Corrêa, Marcos Romário Matos de Souza, Gustavo Peixoto Duarte da Silva, Anna Beatriz Sampaio Vianna Macedo Pimentel, Pedro Telles Calil, Marcela Sabino Cunha, Diana Mariani, Rodrigo de Moraes Brindeiro, Sara Mesquita Costa, Maria Clara da Costa Simas, Victor Akira Ota, Elisa Cavalcante Pereira, Marilda Mendonça Siqueira, Paola Cristina Resende, Rafael Mello Galliez, Debora Souza Faffe, Rosane Silva, Terezinha Marta Pereira Pinto Castiñeiras, Amilcar Tanuri, Luciana Jesus da Costa
{"title":"SARS-CoV-2谱系的复制差异可能源于独特的RNA复制特性和核衣壳蛋白表达。","authors":"Isadora Alonso Corrêa, Marcos Romário Matos de Souza, Gustavo Peixoto Duarte da Silva, Anna Beatriz Sampaio Vianna Macedo Pimentel, Pedro Telles Calil, Marcela Sabino Cunha, Diana Mariani, Rodrigo de Moraes Brindeiro, Sara Mesquita Costa, Maria Clara da Costa Simas, Victor Akira Ota, Elisa Cavalcante Pereira, Marilda Mendonça Siqueira, Paola Cristina Resende, Rafael Mello Galliez, Debora Souza Faffe, Rosane Silva, Terezinha Marta Pereira Pinto Castiñeiras, Amilcar Tanuri, Luciana Jesus da Costa","doi":"10.3389/fcimb.2025.1582137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic was characterized by the sequential introduction and circulation of distinct SARS-CoV-2 variants, which presented differences in transmission capacity and pathogenicity. However, the relationship between these differences and the replicative capacity of these variants remains to be determined. Our research aimed to compare the biological traits of the SARS-CoV-2 lineages B.1.1.33, and variants Zeta (P.2), Gamma (P.1/P.1.*), Delta (B.1.617.2/AY.*), and Omicron (BA.1).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We employed three different cellular models susceptible to viral infection to demonstrated the differences in virus binding, entry and total RNA production through RT-qPCR assay and viral infectious progeny by plaque assay. The RNA replication was evaluated by dsRNA immunofluorescence and the viral protein production by western blotting analysis. NGS and RT-qPCR analysis were also used in competition experiments to verify the viral variants dynamic in cell culture.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that the differences in viral replication varied according to the cell type, with Omicron BA.1 exhibiting the lowest replication capacity in human pulmonary cells. Additionally, we demonstrated the occurrence of nucleocapsid proteoforms generated during infection and differences in size and number of sites of viral RNA replication for each virus.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These data suggest that factors beyond the initial stages of virus entry influence the efficiency of viral replication among different SARS-CoV-2 variants. Thus, our study underscores the significance of RNA replication and the role of nucleocapsid proteins in shaping the replicative characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 variants.</p>","PeriodicalId":12458,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology","volume":"15 ","pages":"1582137"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12289694/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Replication differences of SARS-CoV-2 lineages may arise from unique RNA replication characteristics and nucleocapsid protein expression.\",\"authors\":\"Isadora Alonso Corrêa, Marcos Romário Matos de Souza, Gustavo Peixoto Duarte da Silva, Anna Beatriz Sampaio Vianna Macedo Pimentel, Pedro Telles Calil, Marcela Sabino Cunha, Diana Mariani, Rodrigo de Moraes Brindeiro, Sara Mesquita Costa, Maria Clara da Costa Simas, Victor Akira Ota, Elisa Cavalcante Pereira, Marilda Mendonça Siqueira, Paola Cristina Resende, Rafael Mello Galliez, Debora Souza Faffe, Rosane Silva, Terezinha Marta Pereira Pinto Castiñeiras, Amilcar Tanuri, Luciana Jesus da Costa\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fcimb.2025.1582137\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic was characterized by the sequential introduction and circulation of distinct SARS-CoV-2 variants, which presented differences in transmission capacity and pathogenicity. However, the relationship between these differences and the replicative capacity of these variants remains to be determined. Our research aimed to compare the biological traits of the SARS-CoV-2 lineages B.1.1.33, and variants Zeta (P.2), Gamma (P.1/P.1.*), Delta (B.1.617.2/AY.*), and Omicron (BA.1).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We employed three different cellular models susceptible to viral infection to demonstrated the differences in virus binding, entry and total RNA production through RT-qPCR assay and viral infectious progeny by plaque assay. The RNA replication was evaluated by dsRNA immunofluorescence and the viral protein production by western blotting analysis. NGS and RT-qPCR analysis were also used in competition experiments to verify the viral variants dynamic in cell culture.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that the differences in viral replication varied according to the cell type, with Omicron BA.1 exhibiting the lowest replication capacity in human pulmonary cells. Additionally, we demonstrated the occurrence of nucleocapsid proteoforms generated during infection and differences in size and number of sites of viral RNA replication for each virus.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These data suggest that factors beyond the initial stages of virus entry influence the efficiency of viral replication among different SARS-CoV-2 variants. Thus, our study underscores the significance of RNA replication and the role of nucleocapsid proteins in shaping the replicative characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 variants.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12458,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"1582137\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12289694/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2025.1582137\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2025.1582137","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Replication differences of SARS-CoV-2 lineages may arise from unique RNA replication characteristics and nucleocapsid protein expression.
Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic was characterized by the sequential introduction and circulation of distinct SARS-CoV-2 variants, which presented differences in transmission capacity and pathogenicity. However, the relationship between these differences and the replicative capacity of these variants remains to be determined. Our research aimed to compare the biological traits of the SARS-CoV-2 lineages B.1.1.33, and variants Zeta (P.2), Gamma (P.1/P.1.*), Delta (B.1.617.2/AY.*), and Omicron (BA.1).
Methods: We employed three different cellular models susceptible to viral infection to demonstrated the differences in virus binding, entry and total RNA production through RT-qPCR assay and viral infectious progeny by plaque assay. The RNA replication was evaluated by dsRNA immunofluorescence and the viral protein production by western blotting analysis. NGS and RT-qPCR analysis were also used in competition experiments to verify the viral variants dynamic in cell culture.
Results: We found that the differences in viral replication varied according to the cell type, with Omicron BA.1 exhibiting the lowest replication capacity in human pulmonary cells. Additionally, we demonstrated the occurrence of nucleocapsid proteoforms generated during infection and differences in size and number of sites of viral RNA replication for each virus.
Conclusion: These data suggest that factors beyond the initial stages of virus entry influence the efficiency of viral replication among different SARS-CoV-2 variants. Thus, our study underscores the significance of RNA replication and the role of nucleocapsid proteins in shaping the replicative characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 variants.
期刊介绍:
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology is a leading specialty journal, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across all pathogenic microorganisms and their interaction with their hosts. Chief Editor Yousef Abu Kwaik, University of Louisville is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international experts. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology includes research on bacteria, fungi, parasites, viruses, endosymbionts, prions and all microbial pathogens as well as the microbiota and its effect on health and disease in various hosts. The research approaches include molecular microbiology, cellular microbiology, gene regulation, proteomics, signal transduction, pathogenic evolution, genomics, structural biology, and virulence factors as well as model hosts. Areas of research to counteract infectious agents by the host include the host innate and adaptive immune responses as well as metabolic restrictions to various pathogenic microorganisms, vaccine design and development against various pathogenic microorganisms, and the mechanisms of antibiotic resistance and its countermeasures.