德国50岁及以上成人呼吸道合胞病毒预防佐剂RSVPreF3疫苗的公共卫生影响和成本效益

IF 4.8 3区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY
Expert Review of Vaccines Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-05 DOI:10.1080/14760584.2025.2539887
Maria Waize, Pavo Marijic, Alen Marijam, Foteini Gkalapi, Elisa Turriani, Franziska Jakobs, Indra Jaidhauser, Dorothea Münch, Sara Pedron, Eleftherios Zarkadoulas
{"title":"德国50岁及以上成人呼吸道合胞病毒预防佐剂RSVPreF3疫苗的公共卫生影响和成本效益","authors":"Maria Waize, Pavo Marijic, Alen Marijam, Foteini Gkalapi, Elisa Turriani, Franziska Jakobs, Indra Jaidhauser, Dorothea Münch, Sara Pedron, Eleftherios Zarkadoulas","doi":"10.1080/14760584.2025.2539887","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a leading cause of lower respiratory tract disease in older adults. Vaccination is effective against RSV disease and can reduce disease and economic burden.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>A static, multicohort Markov model was adapted to the German setting to estimate the public health impact and cost-effectiveness of adjuvanted RSVPreF3 vaccination strategies from a societal perspective in three target populations: 1) at increased risk (AIR) adults aged 50-59 years and all adults ≥60 years, 2) all adults aged ≥60 years, and 3) AIR adults aged 60-74 years and all adults ≥75 years. A cycle length of 1 month and a 5-year time horizon were adopted. Vaccine coverage was 75% in the base case.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>RSV vaccination is cost-effective versus no vaccination (<€50,000 willingness-to-pay threshold): incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were €19,789, €19,631, and €12,733 for strategies 1, 2, and 3, respectively; 1.6, 1.4, and 0.8 million outpatient visits and 192,402, 185,238, and 152,781 hospitalizations could be prevented with strategies 1, 2, and 3, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Expanding RSV vaccination to a larger target population would prevent more RSV cases, though at a higher cost per case averted; all vaccination strategies would be deemed cost-effective in Germany.</p>","PeriodicalId":12326,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Vaccines","volume":" ","pages":"782-796"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Public health impact and cost-effectiveness of the adjuvanted RSVPreF3 vaccine for respiratory syncytial virus prevention among adults aged 50 years and older in Germany.\",\"authors\":\"Maria Waize, Pavo Marijic, Alen Marijam, Foteini Gkalapi, Elisa Turriani, Franziska Jakobs, Indra Jaidhauser, Dorothea Münch, Sara Pedron, Eleftherios Zarkadoulas\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14760584.2025.2539887\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a leading cause of lower respiratory tract disease in older adults. Vaccination is effective against RSV disease and can reduce disease and economic burden.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>A static, multicohort Markov model was adapted to the German setting to estimate the public health impact and cost-effectiveness of adjuvanted RSVPreF3 vaccination strategies from a societal perspective in three target populations: 1) at increased risk (AIR) adults aged 50-59 years and all adults ≥60 years, 2) all adults aged ≥60 years, and 3) AIR adults aged 60-74 years and all adults ≥75 years. A cycle length of 1 month and a 5-year time horizon were adopted. Vaccine coverage was 75% in the base case.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>RSV vaccination is cost-effective versus no vaccination (<€50,000 willingness-to-pay threshold): incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were €19,789, €19,631, and €12,733 for strategies 1, 2, and 3, respectively; 1.6, 1.4, and 0.8 million outpatient visits and 192,402, 185,238, and 152,781 hospitalizations could be prevented with strategies 1, 2, and 3, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Expanding RSV vaccination to a larger target population would prevent more RSV cases, though at a higher cost per case averted; all vaccination strategies would be deemed cost-effective in Germany.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12326,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Review of Vaccines\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"782-796\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Review of Vaccines\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14760584.2025.2539887\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Vaccines","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14760584.2025.2539887","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV)是老年人下呼吸道疾病的主要病因。接种疫苗可有效预防RSV疾病,并可减少疾病和经济负担。研究设计和方法:采用静态、多队列马尔可夫模型,从社会角度估计RSVPreF3佐剂疫苗接种策略对三个目标人群的公共卫生影响和成本效益:1)50-59岁风险增加(AIR)的成年人,所有成年人≥60岁;2)所有成年人≥60岁;3)60-74岁的AIR成年人,所有成年人≥75岁。周期长度为1个月,时间跨度为5年。在基本情况下,疫苗覆盖率为75%。结果:接种RSV疫苗比不接种具有成本效益(结论:将RSV疫苗接种扩大到更大的目标人群可以预防更多的RSV病例,尽管避免的每个病例的成本更高;在德国,所有疫苗接种策略都被认为具有成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Public health impact and cost-effectiveness of the adjuvanted RSVPreF3 vaccine for respiratory syncytial virus prevention among adults aged 50 years and older in Germany.

Background: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a leading cause of lower respiratory tract disease in older adults. Vaccination is effective against RSV disease and can reduce disease and economic burden.

Research design and methods: A static, multicohort Markov model was adapted to the German setting to estimate the public health impact and cost-effectiveness of adjuvanted RSVPreF3 vaccination strategies from a societal perspective in three target populations: 1) at increased risk (AIR) adults aged 50-59 years and all adults ≥60 years, 2) all adults aged ≥60 years, and 3) AIR adults aged 60-74 years and all adults ≥75 years. A cycle length of 1 month and a 5-year time horizon were adopted. Vaccine coverage was 75% in the base case.

Results: RSV vaccination is cost-effective versus no vaccination (<€50,000 willingness-to-pay threshold): incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were €19,789, €19,631, and €12,733 for strategies 1, 2, and 3, respectively; 1.6, 1.4, and 0.8 million outpatient visits and 192,402, 185,238, and 152,781 hospitalizations could be prevented with strategies 1, 2, and 3, respectively.

Conclusions: Expanding RSV vaccination to a larger target population would prevent more RSV cases, though at a higher cost per case averted; all vaccination strategies would be deemed cost-effective in Germany.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Expert Review of Vaccines
Expert Review of Vaccines 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
3.20%
发文量
136
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Vaccines (ISSN 1476-0584) provides expert commentary on the development, application, and clinical effectiveness of new vaccines. Coverage includes vaccine technology, vaccine adjuvants, prophylactic vaccines, therapeutic vaccines, AIDS vaccines and vaccines for defence against bioterrorism. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review. The vaccine field has been transformed by recent technological advances, but there remain many challenges in the delivery of cost-effective, safe vaccines. Expert Review of Vaccines facilitates decision making to drive forward this exciting field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信