{"title":"基于机器学习特征选择的局部晚期喉癌生存预后预测模型。","authors":"Jiangmiao Li, Feng Zhao, Junkun He, Ying Zhou, Qiyun Li, Jiping Su","doi":"10.1111/coa.70012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to explore the high-risk factors associated with survival outcomes in patients with locally advanced laryngeal cancer (LALC) and to develop and validate a prognostic prediction model. This model aims to identify high-risk patients, assisting in the selection of appropriate treatment options for each individual.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We included 283 patients who were diagnosed with LALC. The LASSO method, XGBoost algorithm, and random forests (RF) were used to screen essential features associated with the prognosis of LALC. A nomogram was then developed based on the COX regression model. Model validation was conducted internally using the bootstrap method. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC), the area under the ROC curve (AUC), the concordance index (C-index), and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate model performance. Kaplan–Meier curves compared survival outcomes between different groups and the effectiveness of different treatment methods. All statistical analyses were performed using R statistical software (version 4.3.1).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 484 patients with LALC were followed up. The mean follow-up time was (39.07 ± 30.85) months. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates of LALC were 79.13%, 62.82%, and 54.34%, respectively. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 283 patients with LALC were finally included. Seven significant variables were identified, and the nomogram incorporating these predictors demonstrated favourable discrimination and calibration. Additionally, the nomogram successfully distinguished patients into low- and high-risk groups. The AUC values for predicting 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 0.852, 0.850, and 0.829. DCA indicated that the nomogram was clinically useful. The COX model, based on seven features, demonstrated superior performance in predicting 5-year survival outcomes compared to models based on AJCC 8th TNM stage, with NRI as 0.914 and IDI as 0.24.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The Cox regression model developed based on seven independent factors, including ‘Age’, ‘Treatment’, ‘Surgery’, ‘DAA’, ‘K+’, ‘LNR’, and ‘TCIS’, can effectively predict OS in LALC patients. For LALC patients, especially those in the high-risk group, surgery or surgery combined with adjuvant radiotherapy may offer improved survival benefits.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10431,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Otolaryngology","volume":"50 6","pages":"1040-1052"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Survival Prognosis Prediction Model for Locally Advanced Laryngeal Cancer Based on Feature Selection Through Machine Learning\",\"authors\":\"Jiangmiao Li, Feng Zhao, Junkun He, Ying Zhou, Qiyun Li, Jiping Su\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/coa.70012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study aimed to explore the high-risk factors associated with survival outcomes in patients with locally advanced laryngeal cancer (LALC) and to develop and validate a prognostic prediction model. This model aims to identify high-risk patients, assisting in the selection of appropriate treatment options for each individual.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We included 283 patients who were diagnosed with LALC. The LASSO method, XGBoost algorithm, and random forests (RF) were used to screen essential features associated with the prognosis of LALC. A nomogram was then developed based on the COX regression model. Model validation was conducted internally using the bootstrap method. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC), the area under the ROC curve (AUC), the concordance index (C-index), and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate model performance. Kaplan–Meier curves compared survival outcomes between different groups and the effectiveness of different treatment methods. All statistical analyses were performed using R statistical software (version 4.3.1).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 484 patients with LALC were followed up. The mean follow-up time was (39.07 ± 30.85) months. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates of LALC were 79.13%, 62.82%, and 54.34%, respectively. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 283 patients with LALC were finally included. Seven significant variables were identified, and the nomogram incorporating these predictors demonstrated favourable discrimination and calibration. Additionally, the nomogram successfully distinguished patients into low- and high-risk groups. The AUC values for predicting 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 0.852, 0.850, and 0.829. DCA indicated that the nomogram was clinically useful. The COX model, based on seven features, demonstrated superior performance in predicting 5-year survival outcomes compared to models based on AJCC 8th TNM stage, with NRI as 0.914 and IDI as 0.24.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The Cox regression model developed based on seven independent factors, including ‘Age’, ‘Treatment’, ‘Surgery’, ‘DAA’, ‘K+’, ‘LNR’, and ‘TCIS’, can effectively predict OS in LALC patients. For LALC patients, especially those in the high-risk group, surgery or surgery combined with adjuvant radiotherapy may offer improved survival benefits.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Otolaryngology\",\"volume\":\"50 6\",\"pages\":\"1040-1052\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Otolaryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/coa.70012\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/coa.70012","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Survival Prognosis Prediction Model for Locally Advanced Laryngeal Cancer Based on Feature Selection Through Machine Learning
Objective
This study aimed to explore the high-risk factors associated with survival outcomes in patients with locally advanced laryngeal cancer (LALC) and to develop and validate a prognostic prediction model. This model aims to identify high-risk patients, assisting in the selection of appropriate treatment options for each individual.
Methods
We included 283 patients who were diagnosed with LALC. The LASSO method, XGBoost algorithm, and random forests (RF) were used to screen essential features associated with the prognosis of LALC. A nomogram was then developed based on the COX regression model. Model validation was conducted internally using the bootstrap method. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC), the area under the ROC curve (AUC), the concordance index (C-index), and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate model performance. Kaplan–Meier curves compared survival outcomes between different groups and the effectiveness of different treatment methods. All statistical analyses were performed using R statistical software (version 4.3.1).
Results
A total of 484 patients with LALC were followed up. The mean follow-up time was (39.07 ± 30.85) months. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates of LALC were 79.13%, 62.82%, and 54.34%, respectively. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 283 patients with LALC were finally included. Seven significant variables were identified, and the nomogram incorporating these predictors demonstrated favourable discrimination and calibration. Additionally, the nomogram successfully distinguished patients into low- and high-risk groups. The AUC values for predicting 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 0.852, 0.850, and 0.829. DCA indicated that the nomogram was clinically useful. The COX model, based on seven features, demonstrated superior performance in predicting 5-year survival outcomes compared to models based on AJCC 8th TNM stage, with NRI as 0.914 and IDI as 0.24.
Conclusions
The Cox regression model developed based on seven independent factors, including ‘Age’, ‘Treatment’, ‘Surgery’, ‘DAA’, ‘K+’, ‘LNR’, and ‘TCIS’, can effectively predict OS in LALC patients. For LALC patients, especially those in the high-risk group, surgery or surgery combined with adjuvant radiotherapy may offer improved survival benefits.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Otolaryngology is a bimonthly journal devoted to clinically-oriented research papers of the highest scientific standards dealing with:
current otorhinolaryngological practice
audiology, otology, balance, rhinology, larynx, voice and paediatric ORL
head and neck oncology
head and neck plastic and reconstructive surgery
continuing medical education and ORL training
The emphasis is on high quality new work in the clinical field and on fresh, original research.
Each issue begins with an editorial expressing the personal opinions of an individual with a particular knowledge of a chosen subject. The main body of each issue is then devoted to original papers carrying important results for those working in the field. In addition, topical review articles are published discussing a particular subject in depth, including not only the opinions of the author but also any controversies surrounding the subject.
• Negative/null results
In order for research to advance, negative results, which often make a valuable contribution to the field, should be published. However, articles containing negative or null results are frequently not considered for publication or rejected by journals. We welcome papers of this kind, where appropriate and valid power calculations are included that give confidence that a negative result can be relied upon.