Phillip J Haubrock, Ben Parker, Dagmara Błońska, Elizabeta Briski, Teun Everts, Romina D Fernandez, Antonín Kouba, Melina Kourantidou, Irmak Kurtul, Stefano Mammola, Dmitrii L Musolin, Martin A Nuñez, Julian D Olden, Jes J Rasmussen, David Renault, James C Russell, Ronaldo Sousa, Ali Serhan Tarkan, J Robert Britton
{"title":"入侵科学中的概念和伦理考虑。","authors":"Phillip J Haubrock, Ben Parker, Dagmara Błońska, Elizabeta Briski, Teun Everts, Romina D Fernandez, Antonín Kouba, Melina Kourantidou, Irmak Kurtul, Stefano Mammola, Dmitrii L Musolin, Martin A Nuñez, Julian D Olden, Jes J Rasmussen, David Renault, James C Russell, Ronaldo Sousa, Ali Serhan Tarkan, J Robert Britton","doi":"10.1093/biosci/biae138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Invasion science addresses interconnected ecological, economic, and social challenges posed by the introduction of nonnative species. Therefore, invasion scientists have to consider and reconcile interdisciplinary needs while addressing the potential implications of their findings. Navigating diverse disciplines, including environmental sciences, ecology, economics, and the humanities, invasion scientists seek to arrive at informed decisions on invasion risk, impact, and management. Individual biases, uncertainties, and systemic pressures influence the ability to maintain objectivity and resist pressures that might otherwise distort their findings or applications. In the present commentary, we examine conceptual and ethical dilemmas within the field of invasion science, particularly reputational and the risks of the discipline perpetuating its own relevance by framing invasions as insurmountable challenges. In the discussion, we highlight how incentive structures, biased assessments and framing, and conflicts of interest may compromise the discipline's integrity. We also explore questions surrounding human responsibility to animal welfare and highlight ethical conundrums in the management of invasive species.</p>","PeriodicalId":9003,"journal":{"name":"BioScience","volume":"75 4","pages":"317-330"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12290455/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conceptual and ethical considerations in invasion science.\",\"authors\":\"Phillip J Haubrock, Ben Parker, Dagmara Błońska, Elizabeta Briski, Teun Everts, Romina D Fernandez, Antonín Kouba, Melina Kourantidou, Irmak Kurtul, Stefano Mammola, Dmitrii L Musolin, Martin A Nuñez, Julian D Olden, Jes J Rasmussen, David Renault, James C Russell, Ronaldo Sousa, Ali Serhan Tarkan, J Robert Britton\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/biosci/biae138\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Invasion science addresses interconnected ecological, economic, and social challenges posed by the introduction of nonnative species. Therefore, invasion scientists have to consider and reconcile interdisciplinary needs while addressing the potential implications of their findings. Navigating diverse disciplines, including environmental sciences, ecology, economics, and the humanities, invasion scientists seek to arrive at informed decisions on invasion risk, impact, and management. Individual biases, uncertainties, and systemic pressures influence the ability to maintain objectivity and resist pressures that might otherwise distort their findings or applications. In the present commentary, we examine conceptual and ethical dilemmas within the field of invasion science, particularly reputational and the risks of the discipline perpetuating its own relevance by framing invasions as insurmountable challenges. In the discussion, we highlight how incentive structures, biased assessments and framing, and conflicts of interest may compromise the discipline's integrity. We also explore questions surrounding human responsibility to animal welfare and highlight ethical conundrums in the management of invasive species.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9003,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BioScience\",\"volume\":\"75 4\",\"pages\":\"317-330\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12290455/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BioScience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biae138\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BioScience","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biae138","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Conceptual and ethical considerations in invasion science.
Invasion science addresses interconnected ecological, economic, and social challenges posed by the introduction of nonnative species. Therefore, invasion scientists have to consider and reconcile interdisciplinary needs while addressing the potential implications of their findings. Navigating diverse disciplines, including environmental sciences, ecology, economics, and the humanities, invasion scientists seek to arrive at informed decisions on invasion risk, impact, and management. Individual biases, uncertainties, and systemic pressures influence the ability to maintain objectivity and resist pressures that might otherwise distort their findings or applications. In the present commentary, we examine conceptual and ethical dilemmas within the field of invasion science, particularly reputational and the risks of the discipline perpetuating its own relevance by framing invasions as insurmountable challenges. In the discussion, we highlight how incentive structures, biased assessments and framing, and conflicts of interest may compromise the discipline's integrity. We also explore questions surrounding human responsibility to animal welfare and highlight ethical conundrums in the management of invasive species.
期刊介绍:
BioScience is a monthly journal that has been in publication since 1964. It provides readers with authoritative and current overviews of biological research. The journal is peer-reviewed and heavily cited, making it a reliable source for researchers, educators, and students. In addition to research articles, BioScience also covers topics such as biology education, public policy, history, and the fundamental principles of the biological sciences. This makes the content accessible to a wide range of readers. The journal includes professionally written feature articles that explore the latest advancements in biology. It also features discussions on professional issues, book reviews, news about the American Institute of Biological Sciences (AIBS), and columns on policy (Washington Watch) and education (Eye on Education).