入侵科学中的概念和伦理考虑。

IF 7.6 1区 生物学 Q1 BIOLOGY
BioScience Pub Date : 2025-01-22 eCollection Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1093/biosci/biae138
Phillip J Haubrock, Ben Parker, Dagmara Błońska, Elizabeta Briski, Teun Everts, Romina D Fernandez, Antonín Kouba, Melina Kourantidou, Irmak Kurtul, Stefano Mammola, Dmitrii L Musolin, Martin A Nuñez, Julian D Olden, Jes J Rasmussen, David Renault, James C Russell, Ronaldo Sousa, Ali Serhan Tarkan, J Robert Britton
{"title":"入侵科学中的概念和伦理考虑。","authors":"Phillip J Haubrock, Ben Parker, Dagmara Błońska, Elizabeta Briski, Teun Everts, Romina D Fernandez, Antonín Kouba, Melina Kourantidou, Irmak Kurtul, Stefano Mammola, Dmitrii L Musolin, Martin A Nuñez, Julian D Olden, Jes J Rasmussen, David Renault, James C Russell, Ronaldo Sousa, Ali Serhan Tarkan, J Robert Britton","doi":"10.1093/biosci/biae138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Invasion science addresses interconnected ecological, economic, and social challenges posed by the introduction of nonnative species. Therefore, invasion scientists have to consider and reconcile interdisciplinary needs while addressing the potential implications of their findings. Navigating diverse disciplines, including environmental sciences, ecology, economics, and the humanities, invasion scientists seek to arrive at informed decisions on invasion risk, impact, and management. Individual biases, uncertainties, and systemic pressures influence the ability to maintain objectivity and resist pressures that might otherwise distort their findings or applications. In the present commentary, we examine conceptual and ethical dilemmas within the field of invasion science, particularly reputational and the risks of the discipline perpetuating its own relevance by framing invasions as insurmountable challenges. In the discussion, we highlight how incentive structures, biased assessments and framing, and conflicts of interest may compromise the discipline's integrity. We also explore questions surrounding human responsibility to animal welfare and highlight ethical conundrums in the management of invasive species.</p>","PeriodicalId":9003,"journal":{"name":"BioScience","volume":"75 4","pages":"317-330"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12290455/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conceptual and ethical considerations in invasion science.\",\"authors\":\"Phillip J Haubrock, Ben Parker, Dagmara Błońska, Elizabeta Briski, Teun Everts, Romina D Fernandez, Antonín Kouba, Melina Kourantidou, Irmak Kurtul, Stefano Mammola, Dmitrii L Musolin, Martin A Nuñez, Julian D Olden, Jes J Rasmussen, David Renault, James C Russell, Ronaldo Sousa, Ali Serhan Tarkan, J Robert Britton\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/biosci/biae138\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Invasion science addresses interconnected ecological, economic, and social challenges posed by the introduction of nonnative species. Therefore, invasion scientists have to consider and reconcile interdisciplinary needs while addressing the potential implications of their findings. Navigating diverse disciplines, including environmental sciences, ecology, economics, and the humanities, invasion scientists seek to arrive at informed decisions on invasion risk, impact, and management. Individual biases, uncertainties, and systemic pressures influence the ability to maintain objectivity and resist pressures that might otherwise distort their findings or applications. In the present commentary, we examine conceptual and ethical dilemmas within the field of invasion science, particularly reputational and the risks of the discipline perpetuating its own relevance by framing invasions as insurmountable challenges. In the discussion, we highlight how incentive structures, biased assessments and framing, and conflicts of interest may compromise the discipline's integrity. We also explore questions surrounding human responsibility to animal welfare and highlight ethical conundrums in the management of invasive species.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9003,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BioScience\",\"volume\":\"75 4\",\"pages\":\"317-330\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12290455/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BioScience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biae138\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BioScience","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biae138","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

入侵科学解决了引入外来物种所带来的相互关联的生态、经济和社会挑战。因此,入侵科学家在处理其发现的潜在影响时,必须考虑和协调跨学科的需求。入侵科学家通过不同的学科,包括环境科学、生态学、经济学和人文科学,寻求在入侵风险、影响和管理方面做出明智的决定。个人偏见、不确定性和系统压力会影响保持客观性和抵抗可能扭曲其发现或应用的压力的能力。在当前的评论中,我们研究了入侵科学领域的概念和伦理困境,特别是声誉和该学科通过将入侵视为不可克服的挑战而使其自身相关性永久化的风险。在讨论中,我们强调了激励结构、有偏见的评估和框架以及利益冲突如何损害学科的完整性。我们还探讨了有关人类对动物福利的责任的问题,并强调了入侵物种管理中的伦理难题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Conceptual and ethical considerations in invasion science.

Invasion science addresses interconnected ecological, economic, and social challenges posed by the introduction of nonnative species. Therefore, invasion scientists have to consider and reconcile interdisciplinary needs while addressing the potential implications of their findings. Navigating diverse disciplines, including environmental sciences, ecology, economics, and the humanities, invasion scientists seek to arrive at informed decisions on invasion risk, impact, and management. Individual biases, uncertainties, and systemic pressures influence the ability to maintain objectivity and resist pressures that might otherwise distort their findings or applications. In the present commentary, we examine conceptual and ethical dilemmas within the field of invasion science, particularly reputational and the risks of the discipline perpetuating its own relevance by framing invasions as insurmountable challenges. In the discussion, we highlight how incentive structures, biased assessments and framing, and conflicts of interest may compromise the discipline's integrity. We also explore questions surrounding human responsibility to animal welfare and highlight ethical conundrums in the management of invasive species.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BioScience
BioScience 生物-生物学
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
2.00%
发文量
109
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: BioScience is a monthly journal that has been in publication since 1964. It provides readers with authoritative and current overviews of biological research. The journal is peer-reviewed and heavily cited, making it a reliable source for researchers, educators, and students. In addition to research articles, BioScience also covers topics such as biology education, public policy, history, and the fundamental principles of the biological sciences. This makes the content accessible to a wide range of readers. The journal includes professionally written feature articles that explore the latest advancements in biology. It also features discussions on professional issues, book reviews, news about the American Institute of Biological Sciences (AIBS), and columns on policy (Washington Watch) and education (Eye on Education).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信