Andy Walton, Alex Aylward, Mark G. Thomas, Adam Rutherford
{"title":"泛群概念的历史及其在当代群体遗传学中的遗产。","authors":"Andy Walton, Alex Aylward, Mark G. Thomas, Adam Rutherford","doi":"10.1111/ahg.70015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> ABSTRACT</h3>\n \n <p>The panmictic population concept is at the heart of population, evolutionary and conservation genetics. However, in nature, true panmictic populations are vanishingly rare. As an idea conceived for modelling evolutionary dynamics, it has been thought that the assumption of panmixia was formalised during the development of the Modern Synthesis. Here, we show that while the idea's longevity is almost certainly due to its mathematical convenience, it became embedded in evolutionary thought much earlier, initially as a way to reconcile long-standing essentialist ideas with the advent of Darwin's theories. Though the principles of essentialism and reversion have been largely rejected, these ideas persist in shaping assumptions made about populations in contemporary genetics research, including how they are conceptualised and sampled. This legacy has important implications for the interpretation of genomic findings in human evolution, conservation and medicine. From an evaluation of this history and its legacy, we contend that while the panmictic population concept has been, and continues to be useful, with the generation of terabytes of genomic data in the 21st century, its utility is likely to diminish as the need for continuous space models grows.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8085,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Human Genetics","volume":"89 5","pages":"274-284"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ahg.70015","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The History of the Panmictic Population Concept and Its Legacy in Contemporary Population Genetics\",\"authors\":\"Andy Walton, Alex Aylward, Mark G. Thomas, Adam Rutherford\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ahg.70015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> ABSTRACT</h3>\\n \\n <p>The panmictic population concept is at the heart of population, evolutionary and conservation genetics. However, in nature, true panmictic populations are vanishingly rare. As an idea conceived for modelling evolutionary dynamics, it has been thought that the assumption of panmixia was formalised during the development of the Modern Synthesis. Here, we show that while the idea's longevity is almost certainly due to its mathematical convenience, it became embedded in evolutionary thought much earlier, initially as a way to reconcile long-standing essentialist ideas with the advent of Darwin's theories. Though the principles of essentialism and reversion have been largely rejected, these ideas persist in shaping assumptions made about populations in contemporary genetics research, including how they are conceptualised and sampled. This legacy has important implications for the interpretation of genomic findings in human evolution, conservation and medicine. From an evaluation of this history and its legacy, we contend that while the panmictic population concept has been, and continues to be useful, with the generation of terabytes of genomic data in the 21st century, its utility is likely to diminish as the need for continuous space models grows.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8085,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Human Genetics\",\"volume\":\"89 5\",\"pages\":\"274-284\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ahg.70015\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Human Genetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ahg.70015\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Human Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ahg.70015","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The History of the Panmictic Population Concept and Its Legacy in Contemporary Population Genetics
ABSTRACT
The panmictic population concept is at the heart of population, evolutionary and conservation genetics. However, in nature, true panmictic populations are vanishingly rare. As an idea conceived for modelling evolutionary dynamics, it has been thought that the assumption of panmixia was formalised during the development of the Modern Synthesis. Here, we show that while the idea's longevity is almost certainly due to its mathematical convenience, it became embedded in evolutionary thought much earlier, initially as a way to reconcile long-standing essentialist ideas with the advent of Darwin's theories. Though the principles of essentialism and reversion have been largely rejected, these ideas persist in shaping assumptions made about populations in contemporary genetics research, including how they are conceptualised and sampled. This legacy has important implications for the interpretation of genomic findings in human evolution, conservation and medicine. From an evaluation of this history and its legacy, we contend that while the panmictic population concept has been, and continues to be useful, with the generation of terabytes of genomic data in the 21st century, its utility is likely to diminish as the need for continuous space models grows.
期刊介绍:
Annals of Human Genetics publishes material directly concerned with human genetics or the application of scientific principles and techniques to any aspect of human inheritance. Papers that describe work on other species that may be relevant to human genetics will also be considered. Mathematical models should include examples of application to data where possible.
Authors are welcome to submit Supporting Information, such as data sets or additional figures or tables, that will not be published in the print edition of the journal, but which will be viewable via the online edition and stored on the website.