工程石材台面生产中的二氧化硅危害:洛杉矶工人的经验和挑战。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Jane C. Fazio, Sandra R. Garcia, Ivy R. Torres, Sheiphali A. Gandhi, Kristin J. Cummings, Russell G. Buhr, Kevin Riley, Ninez Ponce, Arturo Vargas Bustamante, Beth Glenn
{"title":"工程石材台面生产中的二氧化硅危害:洛杉矶工人的经验和挑战。","authors":"Jane C. Fazio,&nbsp;Sandra R. Garcia,&nbsp;Ivy R. Torres,&nbsp;Sheiphali A. Gandhi,&nbsp;Kristin J. Cummings,&nbsp;Russell G. Buhr,&nbsp;Kevin Riley,&nbsp;Ninez Ponce,&nbsp;Arturo Vargas Bustamante,&nbsp;Beth Glenn","doi":"10.1002/ajim.70010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Silicosis is a progressive occupational lung disease caused by inhalation of respirable crystalline silica. Stone countertop workers are at risk of developing silicosis associated with engineered stone (ES) due to its high silica content and widespread use. This qualitative study assessed countertop workers' knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding silica hazards.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We recruited 20 participants for semi-structured interviews through purposive sampling of workplaces in Los Angeles, California. Eligibility requirements: employment in countertop fabrication, exposure to engineered stone, ≥ 18 years old, and English or Spanish proficiency. Interviews were recorded, translated, and transcribed. Two researchers employed thematic and content analysis to code transcripts using both inductive and deductive methods.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>All respondents were Latino men, 90% of whom were foreign-born, with a median age of 44 years and a median work tenure of 20 years. We identified five themes: (1) <i>Hazardous work environments</i>: Respondents regularly engaged in dry-cutting practices (68%), and half reported that their employers did not reliably provide respirators. (2) <i>Insufficient training and educational resources</i>: Respondents possessed basic knowledge that dust caused lung disease (90%); however, most acquired knowledge through word-of-mouth or media. (3) <i>Employment vulnerability</i>: Workers feared being fired for raising safety concerns. (4) <i>Workforce entrapment:</i> Although many workers considered leaving the industry, they were hindered by a lack of legal immigration status or alternative skills, as well as the presumed lower pay in a new industry. (5) <i>Worker-identified solutions</i>: Workers suggested wet cutting, workplace training, and regulation of ES, including its elimination.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The results support continued policy, regulatory, and enforcement efforts aimed at minimizing silica exposure. Workers recommended workplace and upstream solutions, such as eliminating ES.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":7873,"journal":{"name":"American journal of industrial medicine","volume":"68 10","pages":"867-880"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Silica Hazards in Engineered Stone Countertop Production: Worker Experiences and Challenges in Los Angeles\",\"authors\":\"Jane C. Fazio,&nbsp;Sandra R. Garcia,&nbsp;Ivy R. Torres,&nbsp;Sheiphali A. Gandhi,&nbsp;Kristin J. Cummings,&nbsp;Russell G. Buhr,&nbsp;Kevin Riley,&nbsp;Ninez Ponce,&nbsp;Arturo Vargas Bustamante,&nbsp;Beth Glenn\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ajim.70010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Silicosis is a progressive occupational lung disease caused by inhalation of respirable crystalline silica. Stone countertop workers are at risk of developing silicosis associated with engineered stone (ES) due to its high silica content and widespread use. This qualitative study assessed countertop workers' knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding silica hazards.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We recruited 20 participants for semi-structured interviews through purposive sampling of workplaces in Los Angeles, California. Eligibility requirements: employment in countertop fabrication, exposure to engineered stone, ≥ 18 years old, and English or Spanish proficiency. Interviews were recorded, translated, and transcribed. Two researchers employed thematic and content analysis to code transcripts using both inductive and deductive methods.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>All respondents were Latino men, 90% of whom were foreign-born, with a median age of 44 years and a median work tenure of 20 years. We identified five themes: (1) <i>Hazardous work environments</i>: Respondents regularly engaged in dry-cutting practices (68%), and half reported that their employers did not reliably provide respirators. (2) <i>Insufficient training and educational resources</i>: Respondents possessed basic knowledge that dust caused lung disease (90%); however, most acquired knowledge through word-of-mouth or media. (3) <i>Employment vulnerability</i>: Workers feared being fired for raising safety concerns. (4) <i>Workforce entrapment:</i> Although many workers considered leaving the industry, they were hindered by a lack of legal immigration status or alternative skills, as well as the presumed lower pay in a new industry. (5) <i>Worker-identified solutions</i>: Workers suggested wet cutting, workplace training, and regulation of ES, including its elimination.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The results support continued policy, regulatory, and enforcement efforts aimed at minimizing silica exposure. Workers recommended workplace and upstream solutions, such as eliminating ES.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7873,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of industrial medicine\",\"volume\":\"68 10\",\"pages\":\"867-880\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of industrial medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajim.70010\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of industrial medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajim.70010","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:矽肺病是一种进行性职业性肺病,由吸入可吸入的结晶二氧化硅引起。由于工程石材的高硅含量和广泛使用,石材台面工人有患与工程石材相关的矽肺病的风险。这项定性研究评估了台面工人关于二氧化硅危害的知识、态度和实践。方法:我们通过有目的的抽样,在加利福尼亚州洛杉矶的工作场所招募了20名参与者进行半结构化访谈。资格要求:工作在台面制造,接触工程石材,≥18岁,英语或西班牙语熟练。采访被录音、翻译和转录。两位研究者采用主题分析和内容分析两种方法对转录本进行归纳和演绎编码。结果:所有受访者都是拉丁裔男性,其中90%是外国出生的,平均年龄为44岁,平均工作年限为20年。我们确定了五个主题:(1)危险的工作环境:受访者经常从事干切作业(68%),一半的人报告说他们的雇主没有可靠地提供呼吸器。(2)培训教育资源不足:受访者掌握粉尘导致肺部疾病的基本知识(90%);然而,大多数人通过口口相传或媒体获得知识。(3)就业脆弱性:工人害怕因为提出安全问题而被解雇。(4)劳动力陷阱:尽管许多工人考虑离开这个行业,但由于缺乏合法移民身份或替代技能,以及新行业的工资较低,他们受到了阻碍。(5)工人确定的解决方案:工人建议湿切割、工作场所培训和ES法规,包括消除ES。结论:研究结果支持旨在减少二氧化硅暴露的持续政策、监管和执法努力。工人们推荐了工作场所和上游解决方案,例如消除ES。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Silica Hazards in Engineered Stone Countertop Production: Worker Experiences and Challenges in Los Angeles

Background

Silicosis is a progressive occupational lung disease caused by inhalation of respirable crystalline silica. Stone countertop workers are at risk of developing silicosis associated with engineered stone (ES) due to its high silica content and widespread use. This qualitative study assessed countertop workers' knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding silica hazards.

Methods

We recruited 20 participants for semi-structured interviews through purposive sampling of workplaces in Los Angeles, California. Eligibility requirements: employment in countertop fabrication, exposure to engineered stone, ≥ 18 years old, and English or Spanish proficiency. Interviews were recorded, translated, and transcribed. Two researchers employed thematic and content analysis to code transcripts using both inductive and deductive methods.

Results

All respondents were Latino men, 90% of whom were foreign-born, with a median age of 44 years and a median work tenure of 20 years. We identified five themes: (1) Hazardous work environments: Respondents regularly engaged in dry-cutting practices (68%), and half reported that their employers did not reliably provide respirators. (2) Insufficient training and educational resources: Respondents possessed basic knowledge that dust caused lung disease (90%); however, most acquired knowledge through word-of-mouth or media. (3) Employment vulnerability: Workers feared being fired for raising safety concerns. (4) Workforce entrapment: Although many workers considered leaving the industry, they were hindered by a lack of legal immigration status or alternative skills, as well as the presumed lower pay in a new industry. (5) Worker-identified solutions: Workers suggested wet cutting, workplace training, and regulation of ES, including its elimination.

Conclusion

The results support continued policy, regulatory, and enforcement efforts aimed at minimizing silica exposure. Workers recommended workplace and upstream solutions, such as eliminating ES.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of industrial medicine
American journal of industrial medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
5.70%
发文量
108
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: American Journal of Industrial Medicine considers for publication reports of original research, review articles, instructive case reports, and analyses of policy in the fields of occupational and environmental health and safety. The Journal also accepts commentaries, book reviews and letters of comment and criticism. The goals of the journal are to advance and disseminate knowledge, promote research and foster the prevention of disease and injury. Specific topics of interest include: occupational disease; environmental disease; pesticides; cancer; occupational epidemiology; environmental epidemiology; disease surveillance systems; ergonomics; dust diseases; lead poisoning; neurotoxicology; endocrine disruptors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信