Alfredo Gei, Kim Hennan, Victor Suarez, Rafaela Germano Toledo, Julia Molisani, Nathalia Martinez
{"title":"产钳在胎儿头部人体模型上压力的大小和分布","authors":"Alfredo Gei, Kim Hennan, Victor Suarez, Rafaela Germano Toledo, Julia Molisani, Nathalia Martinez","doi":"10.1111/jog.16363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Considerations for forceps specific shape and dimensions are usually not available for review. This study evaluates surfaces of contact, magnitude of force, and pressure distribution of different forceps on a fetal head model.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Pressure-sensitive films were cut following planar impressions of commonly used forceps. After biparieto-bimalar applications on a term fetal head model, the films were scanned and areas of contact, pressure, and force calculated. Comparisons were made between different types of film and forceps. Significance was considered if <i>p</i> < 0.05.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Fifty-four forceps impressions were analyzed. With decreasing film sensitivities, smaller contact areas (<i>p</i> < 0.01) and higher mean pressures (<i>p</i> < 0.01) were detected. No significant differences were noted between different forceps regarding contact areas, pressure, or force. Most impressions reveal pressure points in the range of 980–1400 psi.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Ergonomic improvements can be made to the design of forceps blades in order to improve maternal-fetal morbidity.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16593,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research","volume":"51 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The magnitude and distribution of pressure of obstetric forceps on a fetal head mannequin model\",\"authors\":\"Alfredo Gei, Kim Hennan, Victor Suarez, Rafaela Germano Toledo, Julia Molisani, Nathalia Martinez\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jog.16363\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Considerations for forceps specific shape and dimensions are usually not available for review. This study evaluates surfaces of contact, magnitude of force, and pressure distribution of different forceps on a fetal head model.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Pressure-sensitive films were cut following planar impressions of commonly used forceps. After biparieto-bimalar applications on a term fetal head model, the films were scanned and areas of contact, pressure, and force calculated. Comparisons were made between different types of film and forceps. Significance was considered if <i>p</i> < 0.05.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Fifty-four forceps impressions were analyzed. With decreasing film sensitivities, smaller contact areas (<i>p</i> < 0.01) and higher mean pressures (<i>p</i> < 0.01) were detected. No significant differences were noted between different forceps regarding contact areas, pressure, or force. Most impressions reveal pressure points in the range of 980–1400 psi.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Ergonomic improvements can be made to the design of forceps blades in order to improve maternal-fetal morbidity.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16593,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research\",\"volume\":\"51 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jog.16363\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jog.16363","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The magnitude and distribution of pressure of obstetric forceps on a fetal head mannequin model
Introduction
Considerations for forceps specific shape and dimensions are usually not available for review. This study evaluates surfaces of contact, magnitude of force, and pressure distribution of different forceps on a fetal head model.
Materials and Methods
Pressure-sensitive films were cut following planar impressions of commonly used forceps. After biparieto-bimalar applications on a term fetal head model, the films were scanned and areas of contact, pressure, and force calculated. Comparisons were made between different types of film and forceps. Significance was considered if p < 0.05.
Results
Fifty-four forceps impressions were analyzed. With decreasing film sensitivities, smaller contact areas (p < 0.01) and higher mean pressures (p < 0.01) were detected. No significant differences were noted between different forceps regarding contact areas, pressure, or force. Most impressions reveal pressure points in the range of 980–1400 psi.
Conclusion
Ergonomic improvements can be made to the design of forceps blades in order to improve maternal-fetal morbidity.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research is the official Journal of the Asia and Oceania Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology and of the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and aims to provide a medium for the publication of articles in the fields of obstetrics and gynecology.
The Journal publishes original research articles, case reports, review articles and letters to the editor. The Journal will give publication priority to original research articles over case reports. Accepted papers become the exclusive licence of the Journal. Manuscripts are peer reviewed by at least two referees and/or Associate Editors expert in the field of the submitted paper.