{"title":"量化中国城市化和人口迁移的分配效应","authors":"Wei Tang , Lili Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.chieco.2025.102513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper investigates the distributional effects of urbanization and migration in China by employing a two-sector spatial equilibrium model and population censuses in 2005 and 2015. Our analysis reveals that rural migrants who are predominantly low-skill exhibit higher substitutability with urban low-skill natives than with urban high-skill natives. Taking into account changes in nominal wages, housing prices, and local amenities, our quantitative results suggest that the reduction in rural-urban migration costs over the period contributed to an overall increase in national welfare of approximately 4 % to 5 %. Rural population experiences the largest welfare improvements, with gains ranging from 5.84 % to 7.74 %. Assuming an equal distribution of rental income among native residents, high-skill urban population experiences welfare increases between 0.96 % and 1.37 %, whereas low-skill urban population receives comparatively smaller gains, ranging from 0.25 % to 0.55 %. By contrast, urban population without housing ownership incurs welfare losses of 0.39 % to 1.89 %.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48285,"journal":{"name":"中国经济评论","volume":"94 ","pages":"Article 102513"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantifying the distributional effects of urbanization and migration in China\",\"authors\":\"Wei Tang , Lili Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chieco.2025.102513\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This paper investigates the distributional effects of urbanization and migration in China by employing a two-sector spatial equilibrium model and population censuses in 2005 and 2015. Our analysis reveals that rural migrants who are predominantly low-skill exhibit higher substitutability with urban low-skill natives than with urban high-skill natives. Taking into account changes in nominal wages, housing prices, and local amenities, our quantitative results suggest that the reduction in rural-urban migration costs over the period contributed to an overall increase in national welfare of approximately 4 % to 5 %. Rural population experiences the largest welfare improvements, with gains ranging from 5.84 % to 7.74 %. Assuming an equal distribution of rental income among native residents, high-skill urban population experiences welfare increases between 0.96 % and 1.37 %, whereas low-skill urban population receives comparatively smaller gains, ranging from 0.25 % to 0.55 %. By contrast, urban population without housing ownership incurs welfare losses of 0.39 % to 1.89 %.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48285,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中国经济评论\",\"volume\":\"94 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102513\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中国经济评论\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1043951X25001713\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国经济评论","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1043951X25001713","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Quantifying the distributional effects of urbanization and migration in China
This paper investigates the distributional effects of urbanization and migration in China by employing a two-sector spatial equilibrium model and population censuses in 2005 and 2015. Our analysis reveals that rural migrants who are predominantly low-skill exhibit higher substitutability with urban low-skill natives than with urban high-skill natives. Taking into account changes in nominal wages, housing prices, and local amenities, our quantitative results suggest that the reduction in rural-urban migration costs over the period contributed to an overall increase in national welfare of approximately 4 % to 5 %. Rural population experiences the largest welfare improvements, with gains ranging from 5.84 % to 7.74 %. Assuming an equal distribution of rental income among native residents, high-skill urban population experiences welfare increases between 0.96 % and 1.37 %, whereas low-skill urban population receives comparatively smaller gains, ranging from 0.25 % to 0.55 %. By contrast, urban population without housing ownership incurs welfare losses of 0.39 % to 1.89 %.
期刊介绍:
The China Economic Review publishes original works of scholarship which add to the knowledge of the economy of China and to economies as a discipline. We seek, in particular, papers dealing with policy, performance and institutional change. Empirical papers normally use a formal model, a data set, and standard statistical techniques. Submissions are subjected to double-blind peer review.