{"title":"语音熟悉有助于成人同音同义字的学习:行为和ERP证据","authors":"Ekaterina Larionova , Zhanna Garakh","doi":"10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2025.113235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Homophones share identical pronunciations but differ in spelling and meaning, presenting a challenge in language acquisition. This study investigated whether the phonological familiarity of novel homophones aids the learning of orthographic forms and meanings or whether a mismatch between familiar sounds and new orthography creates obstacles to acquisition. Using Russian words, we created pseudohomophones that are identical in pronunciation to familiar words but have different spellings, as well as non-homophonic pseudowords that differ from familiar words in both pronunciation and spelling. Twenty-eight participants learned pseudohomophones and pseudowords in two experiments. We assessed orthographic and semantic acquisition using behavioral tasks and evaluated neural responses before and after learning using ERPs. Pseudohomophones were learned faster and their orthographic forms acquired better than those of pseudowords. Before learning, pseudowords elicited a larger N400 than familiar words, whereas pseudohomophones did not differ significantly, suggesting that phonological similarity hindered their distinction from real words. After learning, pseudowords showed modulations in the P200, N250-P325, and P600 components, reflecting the formation of new orthographic, phonological, and semantic representations. In contrast, only the P600 was modulated for pseudohomophones, likely because their phonology was already familiar. Moreover, comparison between pseudohomophones and pseudowords revealed greater modulation in frontal regions around 300 ms for pseudowords due to the learning session, indicating the formation of phonological representations and increased attentional demands. These findings are compatible with the connectionist dual-process model, suggesting a learning advantage for pseudohomophones based on existing phonological representations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54945,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Psychophysiology","volume":"215 ","pages":"Article 113235"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Phonological familiarity facilitates the learning of homophones in adults: Behavioral and ERP evidence\",\"authors\":\"Ekaterina Larionova , Zhanna Garakh\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2025.113235\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Homophones share identical pronunciations but differ in spelling and meaning, presenting a challenge in language acquisition. This study investigated whether the phonological familiarity of novel homophones aids the learning of orthographic forms and meanings or whether a mismatch between familiar sounds and new orthography creates obstacles to acquisition. Using Russian words, we created pseudohomophones that are identical in pronunciation to familiar words but have different spellings, as well as non-homophonic pseudowords that differ from familiar words in both pronunciation and spelling. Twenty-eight participants learned pseudohomophones and pseudowords in two experiments. We assessed orthographic and semantic acquisition using behavioral tasks and evaluated neural responses before and after learning using ERPs. Pseudohomophones were learned faster and their orthographic forms acquired better than those of pseudowords. Before learning, pseudowords elicited a larger N400 than familiar words, whereas pseudohomophones did not differ significantly, suggesting that phonological similarity hindered their distinction from real words. After learning, pseudowords showed modulations in the P200, N250-P325, and P600 components, reflecting the formation of new orthographic, phonological, and semantic representations. In contrast, only the P600 was modulated for pseudohomophones, likely because their phonology was already familiar. Moreover, comparison between pseudohomophones and pseudowords revealed greater modulation in frontal regions around 300 ms for pseudowords due to the learning session, indicating the formation of phonological representations and increased attentional demands. These findings are compatible with the connectionist dual-process model, suggesting a learning advantage for pseudohomophones based on existing phonological representations.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Psychophysiology\",\"volume\":\"215 \",\"pages\":\"Article 113235\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Psychophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167876025007317\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Psychophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167876025007317","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Phonological familiarity facilitates the learning of homophones in adults: Behavioral and ERP evidence
Homophones share identical pronunciations but differ in spelling and meaning, presenting a challenge in language acquisition. This study investigated whether the phonological familiarity of novel homophones aids the learning of orthographic forms and meanings or whether a mismatch between familiar sounds and new orthography creates obstacles to acquisition. Using Russian words, we created pseudohomophones that are identical in pronunciation to familiar words but have different spellings, as well as non-homophonic pseudowords that differ from familiar words in both pronunciation and spelling. Twenty-eight participants learned pseudohomophones and pseudowords in two experiments. We assessed orthographic and semantic acquisition using behavioral tasks and evaluated neural responses before and after learning using ERPs. Pseudohomophones were learned faster and their orthographic forms acquired better than those of pseudowords. Before learning, pseudowords elicited a larger N400 than familiar words, whereas pseudohomophones did not differ significantly, suggesting that phonological similarity hindered their distinction from real words. After learning, pseudowords showed modulations in the P200, N250-P325, and P600 components, reflecting the formation of new orthographic, phonological, and semantic representations. In contrast, only the P600 was modulated for pseudohomophones, likely because their phonology was already familiar. Moreover, comparison between pseudohomophones and pseudowords revealed greater modulation in frontal regions around 300 ms for pseudowords due to the learning session, indicating the formation of phonological representations and increased attentional demands. These findings are compatible with the connectionist dual-process model, suggesting a learning advantage for pseudohomophones based on existing phonological representations.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Psychophysiology is the official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology, and provides a respected forum for the publication of high quality original contributions on all aspects of psychophysiology. The journal is interdisciplinary and aims to integrate the neurosciences and behavioral sciences. Empirical, theoretical, and review articles are encouraged in the following areas:
• Cerebral psychophysiology: including functional brain mapping and neuroimaging with Event-Related Potentials (ERPs), Positron Emission Tomography (PET), Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) and Electroencephalographic studies.
• Autonomic functions: including bilateral electrodermal activity, pupillometry and blood volume changes.
• Cardiovascular Psychophysiology:including studies of blood pressure, cardiac functioning and respiration.
• Somatic psychophysiology: including muscle activity, eye movements and eye blinks.