沉积物埋藏对海草Posidonia sinuosa的生长有负面影响

IF 4.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Chanelle Webster , Nicole Said , Natasha Dunham , Simone Strydom , Kathryn McMahon
{"title":"沉积物埋藏对海草Posidonia sinuosa的生长有负面影响","authors":"Chanelle Webster ,&nbsp;Nicole Said ,&nbsp;Natasha Dunham ,&nbsp;Simone Strydom ,&nbsp;Kathryn McMahon","doi":"10.1016/j.marpolbul.2025.118505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Burial disturbances affect foundation plant species in marine ecosystems. Deposition of dredge spoil can bury seagrass meadows yet we have limited threshold information to predict the trajectory of impact from burial or possible recovery. To investigate the response to burial by dredge spoil, established seagrass ramets of <em>Posidonia sinuosa</em> were collected from a population in Western Australia and exposed to cutter suction dredge spoil sediment. Plant responses were measured during a burial phase after 2, 4 and 8 weeks to assess the influence of duration to burial depths (0, 1, 4, 8 and 16 cm). Sediments were then removed, and recovery was monitored after 5 and 8 weeks. <em>P. sinuosa</em> was unaffected by burial of 1 and 4 cm whereas greater depths of burial led to negative impacts on ramet photophysiology and growth. In the 8 and 16 cm treatments, declines in seagrass growth were significant and sediment redox damaged seagrass health, reflecting conditions consistent with impaired plant physiology and anoxic sediment in the root zone. After burial was removed, seagrass growth rates in 8 and 16 cm treatments showed no recovery after 8 weeks. Although shoots were not lost, reduced growth and no shoot recovery in the short-term, 8 cm or more of dredge-deposition sediment could be used as a threshold for dredging management. Plant response under 16 cm of sediment suggests that the greater the seagrass burial depth the greater the adverse effect on the seagrass community including an impeded ability to recover and reduced population resilience.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18215,"journal":{"name":"Marine pollution bulletin","volume":"221 ","pages":"Article 118505"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sediment burial negatively impacts the growth of seagrass Posidonia sinuosa\",\"authors\":\"Chanelle Webster ,&nbsp;Nicole Said ,&nbsp;Natasha Dunham ,&nbsp;Simone Strydom ,&nbsp;Kathryn McMahon\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.marpolbul.2025.118505\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Burial disturbances affect foundation plant species in marine ecosystems. Deposition of dredge spoil can bury seagrass meadows yet we have limited threshold information to predict the trajectory of impact from burial or possible recovery. To investigate the response to burial by dredge spoil, established seagrass ramets of <em>Posidonia sinuosa</em> were collected from a population in Western Australia and exposed to cutter suction dredge spoil sediment. Plant responses were measured during a burial phase after 2, 4 and 8 weeks to assess the influence of duration to burial depths (0, 1, 4, 8 and 16 cm). Sediments were then removed, and recovery was monitored after 5 and 8 weeks. <em>P. sinuosa</em> was unaffected by burial of 1 and 4 cm whereas greater depths of burial led to negative impacts on ramet photophysiology and growth. In the 8 and 16 cm treatments, declines in seagrass growth were significant and sediment redox damaged seagrass health, reflecting conditions consistent with impaired plant physiology and anoxic sediment in the root zone. After burial was removed, seagrass growth rates in 8 and 16 cm treatments showed no recovery after 8 weeks. Although shoots were not lost, reduced growth and no shoot recovery in the short-term, 8 cm or more of dredge-deposition sediment could be used as a threshold for dredging management. Plant response under 16 cm of sediment suggests that the greater the seagrass burial depth the greater the adverse effect on the seagrass community including an impeded ability to recover and reduced population resilience.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18215,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Marine pollution bulletin\",\"volume\":\"221 \",\"pages\":\"Article 118505\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Marine pollution bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025326X25009804\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marine pollution bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025326X25009804","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

埋藏扰动对海洋生态系统中基础植物物种的影响。疏浚废物的沉积会掩埋海草草甸,但我们有限的阈值信息来预测掩埋或可能恢复的影响轨迹。为了调查疏浚垃圾掩埋对海草的反应,从西澳大利亚的一个种群中收集了已建立的波西多尼亚sinuosa海草种群,并将其暴露于绞吸式疏浚垃圾沉积物中。在2、4和8周后的掩埋阶段测量植物的反应,以评估持续时间对掩埋深度(0、1、4、8和16厘米)的影响。然后清除沉积物,并在5周和8周后监测恢复情况。埋深1 cm和4 cm对紫杉树的光合生理和生长没有影响,而埋深越深对紫杉树的光合生理和生长有负面影响。在8 cm和16 cm处理下,海草生长显著下降,沉积物氧化还原损害了海草的健康,反映了植物生理受损和根区缺氧沉积物的情况。除去掩埋物后,8周后8 cm和16 cm处理的海草生长速率没有恢复。虽然短期内不会造成新芽损失、生长减少和新芽恢复,但8厘米或以上的疏浚沉积物可以作为疏浚管理的阈值。16 cm沉积物下的植物响应表明,海草埋深越大,对海草群落的不利影响越大,包括恢复能力受到阻碍和种群恢复力降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sediment burial negatively impacts the growth of seagrass Posidonia sinuosa
Burial disturbances affect foundation plant species in marine ecosystems. Deposition of dredge spoil can bury seagrass meadows yet we have limited threshold information to predict the trajectory of impact from burial or possible recovery. To investigate the response to burial by dredge spoil, established seagrass ramets of Posidonia sinuosa were collected from a population in Western Australia and exposed to cutter suction dredge spoil sediment. Plant responses were measured during a burial phase after 2, 4 and 8 weeks to assess the influence of duration to burial depths (0, 1, 4, 8 and 16 cm). Sediments were then removed, and recovery was monitored after 5 and 8 weeks. P. sinuosa was unaffected by burial of 1 and 4 cm whereas greater depths of burial led to negative impacts on ramet photophysiology and growth. In the 8 and 16 cm treatments, declines in seagrass growth were significant and sediment redox damaged seagrass health, reflecting conditions consistent with impaired plant physiology and anoxic sediment in the root zone. After burial was removed, seagrass growth rates in 8 and 16 cm treatments showed no recovery after 8 weeks. Although shoots were not lost, reduced growth and no shoot recovery in the short-term, 8 cm or more of dredge-deposition sediment could be used as a threshold for dredging management. Plant response under 16 cm of sediment suggests that the greater the seagrass burial depth the greater the adverse effect on the seagrass community including an impeded ability to recover and reduced population resilience.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Marine pollution bulletin
Marine pollution bulletin 环境科学-海洋与淡水生物学
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
15.50%
发文量
1077
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: Marine Pollution Bulletin is concerned with the rational use of maritime and marine resources in estuaries, the seas and oceans, as well as with documenting marine pollution and introducing new forms of measurement and analysis. A wide range of topics are discussed as news, comment, reviews and research reports, not only on effluent disposal and pollution control, but also on the management, economic aspects and protection of the marine environment in general.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信