Igor Sulzbacher Schardong , Dominic D. Reisig , Rachel Vann , Anders Huseth
{"title":"人工落叶对大豆全季和双季产量的影响","authors":"Igor Sulzbacher Schardong , Dominic D. Reisig , Rachel Vann , Anders Huseth","doi":"10.1016/j.cropro.2025.107347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Double-cropping soybean behind winter wheat harvested in June or July is a common production practice in the Southeast USA. This contrasts full-season soybean production where soybean are planted earlier in April and May. Usually, double-cropped soybean does not yield as high as full-season soybean due to a shorter period of vegetative growth. Hence, photosynthetic tissue loss by defoliating insects might have a great negative impact on yield loss in double-cropped relative to full-season soybean, but this has not been extensively explored. We hypothesized that defoliation during R5 (seed filling) would cause more yield loss in doubled-cropped compared to full-season soybean. To explore this, we planted soybean either in May or July, simulating full-season and double-cropped cropping systems, and manually defoliated plants by removing leaflets at R5. We compared 0, 16.7, 33.3, 66.6 and 100 % defoliation levels in a factorial design. We evaluated yield, yield components (number of pods per plant, number of seeds per pod, and weight of 200 seeds) and canopy coverage. Full-season soybean had a higher overall yield compared to double-cropped soybean. Across both cropping systems, yield decreased as defoliation levels increased. Across defoliation levels, some yield components were reduced, but only at high defoliation levels (100 % defoliation). Across cropping systems, seeds were heavier in full-season compared to double-cropped soybean. Overall, the impacts of defoliation did not change between these two cropping systems. These findings need to be supported by further research to refine thresholds for defoliating insects in southeastern US soybean.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10785,"journal":{"name":"Crop Protection","volume":"197 ","pages":"Article 107347"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial defoliation effects on full season and double crop soybean yields\",\"authors\":\"Igor Sulzbacher Schardong , Dominic D. Reisig , Rachel Vann , Anders Huseth\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cropro.2025.107347\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Double-cropping soybean behind winter wheat harvested in June or July is a common production practice in the Southeast USA. This contrasts full-season soybean production where soybean are planted earlier in April and May. Usually, double-cropped soybean does not yield as high as full-season soybean due to a shorter period of vegetative growth. Hence, photosynthetic tissue loss by defoliating insects might have a great negative impact on yield loss in double-cropped relative to full-season soybean, but this has not been extensively explored. We hypothesized that defoliation during R5 (seed filling) would cause more yield loss in doubled-cropped compared to full-season soybean. To explore this, we planted soybean either in May or July, simulating full-season and double-cropped cropping systems, and manually defoliated plants by removing leaflets at R5. We compared 0, 16.7, 33.3, 66.6 and 100 % defoliation levels in a factorial design. We evaluated yield, yield components (number of pods per plant, number of seeds per pod, and weight of 200 seeds) and canopy coverage. Full-season soybean had a higher overall yield compared to double-cropped soybean. Across both cropping systems, yield decreased as defoliation levels increased. Across defoliation levels, some yield components were reduced, but only at high defoliation levels (100 % defoliation). Across cropping systems, seeds were heavier in full-season compared to double-cropped soybean. Overall, the impacts of defoliation did not change between these two cropping systems. These findings need to be supported by further research to refine thresholds for defoliating insects in southeastern US soybean.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10785,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Crop Protection\",\"volume\":\"197 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107347\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Crop Protection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026121942500239X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crop Protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026121942500239X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Artificial defoliation effects on full season and double crop soybean yields
Double-cropping soybean behind winter wheat harvested in June or July is a common production practice in the Southeast USA. This contrasts full-season soybean production where soybean are planted earlier in April and May. Usually, double-cropped soybean does not yield as high as full-season soybean due to a shorter period of vegetative growth. Hence, photosynthetic tissue loss by defoliating insects might have a great negative impact on yield loss in double-cropped relative to full-season soybean, but this has not been extensively explored. We hypothesized that defoliation during R5 (seed filling) would cause more yield loss in doubled-cropped compared to full-season soybean. To explore this, we planted soybean either in May or July, simulating full-season and double-cropped cropping systems, and manually defoliated plants by removing leaflets at R5. We compared 0, 16.7, 33.3, 66.6 and 100 % defoliation levels in a factorial design. We evaluated yield, yield components (number of pods per plant, number of seeds per pod, and weight of 200 seeds) and canopy coverage. Full-season soybean had a higher overall yield compared to double-cropped soybean. Across both cropping systems, yield decreased as defoliation levels increased. Across defoliation levels, some yield components were reduced, but only at high defoliation levels (100 % defoliation). Across cropping systems, seeds were heavier in full-season compared to double-cropped soybean. Overall, the impacts of defoliation did not change between these two cropping systems. These findings need to be supported by further research to refine thresholds for defoliating insects in southeastern US soybean.
期刊介绍:
The Editors of Crop Protection especially welcome papers describing an interdisciplinary approach showing how different control strategies can be integrated into practical pest management programs, covering high and low input agricultural systems worldwide. Crop Protection particularly emphasizes the practical aspects of control in the field and for protected crops, and includes work which may lead in the near future to more effective control. The journal does not duplicate the many existing excellent biological science journals, which deal mainly with the more fundamental aspects of plant pathology, applied zoology and weed science. Crop Protection covers all practical aspects of pest, disease and weed control, including the following topics:
-Abiotic damage-
Agronomic control methods-
Assessment of pest and disease damage-
Molecular methods for the detection and assessment of pests and diseases-
Biological control-
Biorational pesticides-
Control of animal pests of world crops-
Control of diseases of crop plants caused by microorganisms-
Control of weeds and integrated management-
Economic considerations-
Effects of plant growth regulators-
Environmental benefits of reduced pesticide use-
Environmental effects of pesticides-
Epidemiology of pests and diseases in relation to control-
GM Crops, and genetic engineering applications-
Importance and control of postharvest crop losses-
Integrated control-
Interrelationships and compatibility among different control strategies-
Invasive species as they relate to implications for crop protection-
Pesticide application methods-
Pest management-
Phytobiomes for pest and disease control-
Resistance management-
Sampling and monitoring schemes for diseases, nematodes, pests and weeds.