人工落叶对大豆全季和双季产量的影响

IF 2.5 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Igor Sulzbacher Schardong , Dominic D. Reisig , Rachel Vann , Anders Huseth
{"title":"人工落叶对大豆全季和双季产量的影响","authors":"Igor Sulzbacher Schardong ,&nbsp;Dominic D. Reisig ,&nbsp;Rachel Vann ,&nbsp;Anders Huseth","doi":"10.1016/j.cropro.2025.107347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Double-cropping soybean behind winter wheat harvested in June or July is a common production practice in the Southeast USA. This contrasts full-season soybean production where soybean are planted earlier in April and May. Usually, double-cropped soybean does not yield as high as full-season soybean due to a shorter period of vegetative growth. Hence, photosynthetic tissue loss by defoliating insects might have a great negative impact on yield loss in double-cropped relative to full-season soybean, but this has not been extensively explored. We hypothesized that defoliation during R5 (seed filling) would cause more yield loss in doubled-cropped compared to full-season soybean. To explore this, we planted soybean either in May or July, simulating full-season and double-cropped cropping systems, and manually defoliated plants by removing leaflets at R5. We compared 0, 16.7, 33.3, 66.6 and 100 % defoliation levels in a factorial design. We evaluated yield, yield components (number of pods per plant, number of seeds per pod, and weight of 200 seeds) and canopy coverage. Full-season soybean had a higher overall yield compared to double-cropped soybean. Across both cropping systems, yield decreased as defoliation levels increased. Across defoliation levels, some yield components were reduced, but only at high defoliation levels (100 % defoliation). Across cropping systems, seeds were heavier in full-season compared to double-cropped soybean. Overall, the impacts of defoliation did not change between these two cropping systems. These findings need to be supported by further research to refine thresholds for defoliating insects in southeastern US soybean.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10785,"journal":{"name":"Crop Protection","volume":"197 ","pages":"Article 107347"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial defoliation effects on full season and double crop soybean yields\",\"authors\":\"Igor Sulzbacher Schardong ,&nbsp;Dominic D. Reisig ,&nbsp;Rachel Vann ,&nbsp;Anders Huseth\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cropro.2025.107347\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Double-cropping soybean behind winter wheat harvested in June or July is a common production practice in the Southeast USA. This contrasts full-season soybean production where soybean are planted earlier in April and May. Usually, double-cropped soybean does not yield as high as full-season soybean due to a shorter period of vegetative growth. Hence, photosynthetic tissue loss by defoliating insects might have a great negative impact on yield loss in double-cropped relative to full-season soybean, but this has not been extensively explored. We hypothesized that defoliation during R5 (seed filling) would cause more yield loss in doubled-cropped compared to full-season soybean. To explore this, we planted soybean either in May or July, simulating full-season and double-cropped cropping systems, and manually defoliated plants by removing leaflets at R5. We compared 0, 16.7, 33.3, 66.6 and 100 % defoliation levels in a factorial design. We evaluated yield, yield components (number of pods per plant, number of seeds per pod, and weight of 200 seeds) and canopy coverage. Full-season soybean had a higher overall yield compared to double-cropped soybean. Across both cropping systems, yield decreased as defoliation levels increased. Across defoliation levels, some yield components were reduced, but only at high defoliation levels (100 % defoliation). Across cropping systems, seeds were heavier in full-season compared to double-cropped soybean. Overall, the impacts of defoliation did not change between these two cropping systems. These findings need to be supported by further research to refine thresholds for defoliating insects in southeastern US soybean.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10785,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Crop Protection\",\"volume\":\"197 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107347\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Crop Protection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026121942500239X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crop Protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026121942500239X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在6月或7月收获的冬小麦之后,两季大豆是美国东南部常见的生产做法。这与大豆全季生产形成对比,大豆在4月和5月种植得更早。通常,由于营养生长期较短,双季大豆的产量不如全季大豆高。因此,相对于全季大豆,双季大豆的光合组织损失可能对产量损失有很大的负面影响,但这一点尚未得到广泛的研究。我们假设,与全季大豆相比,双季大豆在种子灌浆期间的落叶会造成更大的产量损失。为了探索这一点,我们在5月或7月种植大豆,模拟全季和双季种植系统,并在R5时人工去除小叶。我们在析因设计中比较了0、16.7、33.3、66.6%和100%的落叶水平。我们评估了产量、产量成分(每株荚果数、每荚果数和200粒种子重)和冠层盖度。与双季大豆相比,全季大豆的总产量更高。在两种种植制度中,产量随着落叶水平的增加而下降。在不同的落叶水平,一些产量成分降低,但仅在高落叶水平(100%落叶)。在整个种植制度中,与双季大豆相比,全季大豆的种子较重。总体而言,两种种植制度对落叶的影响没有变化。这些发现需要进一步的研究来支持,以完善美国东南部大豆中落叶昆虫的阈值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Artificial defoliation effects on full season and double crop soybean yields
Double-cropping soybean behind winter wheat harvested in June or July is a common production practice in the Southeast USA. This contrasts full-season soybean production where soybean are planted earlier in April and May. Usually, double-cropped soybean does not yield as high as full-season soybean due to a shorter period of vegetative growth. Hence, photosynthetic tissue loss by defoliating insects might have a great negative impact on yield loss in double-cropped relative to full-season soybean, but this has not been extensively explored. We hypothesized that defoliation during R5 (seed filling) would cause more yield loss in doubled-cropped compared to full-season soybean. To explore this, we planted soybean either in May or July, simulating full-season and double-cropped cropping systems, and manually defoliated plants by removing leaflets at R5. We compared 0, 16.7, 33.3, 66.6 and 100 % defoliation levels in a factorial design. We evaluated yield, yield components (number of pods per plant, number of seeds per pod, and weight of 200 seeds) and canopy coverage. Full-season soybean had a higher overall yield compared to double-cropped soybean. Across both cropping systems, yield decreased as defoliation levels increased. Across defoliation levels, some yield components were reduced, but only at high defoliation levels (100 % defoliation). Across cropping systems, seeds were heavier in full-season compared to double-cropped soybean. Overall, the impacts of defoliation did not change between these two cropping systems. These findings need to be supported by further research to refine thresholds for defoliating insects in southeastern US soybean.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Crop Protection
Crop Protection 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
200
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: The Editors of Crop Protection especially welcome papers describing an interdisciplinary approach showing how different control strategies can be integrated into practical pest management programs, covering high and low input agricultural systems worldwide. Crop Protection particularly emphasizes the practical aspects of control in the field and for protected crops, and includes work which may lead in the near future to more effective control. The journal does not duplicate the many existing excellent biological science journals, which deal mainly with the more fundamental aspects of plant pathology, applied zoology and weed science. Crop Protection covers all practical aspects of pest, disease and weed control, including the following topics: -Abiotic damage- Agronomic control methods- Assessment of pest and disease damage- Molecular methods for the detection and assessment of pests and diseases- Biological control- Biorational pesticides- Control of animal pests of world crops- Control of diseases of crop plants caused by microorganisms- Control of weeds and integrated management- Economic considerations- Effects of plant growth regulators- Environmental benefits of reduced pesticide use- Environmental effects of pesticides- Epidemiology of pests and diseases in relation to control- GM Crops, and genetic engineering applications- Importance and control of postharvest crop losses- Integrated control- Interrelationships and compatibility among different control strategies- Invasive species as they relate to implications for crop protection- Pesticide application methods- Pest management- Phytobiomes for pest and disease control- Resistance management- Sampling and monitoring schemes for diseases, nematodes, pests and weeds.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信