生存筒仓:环境变化和核威胁的未来的划分

IF 3.8 3区 管理学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Sterre van Buuren , Thomas Fraise , Benoît Pelopidas
{"title":"生存筒仓:环境变化和核威胁的未来的划分","authors":"Sterre van Buuren ,&nbsp;Thomas Fraise ,&nbsp;Benoît Pelopidas","doi":"10.1016/j.futures.2025.103671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Nuclear weapons and environmental change are two existential threats to humanity. This article shows that current policy and academic discourse neglects their possible future interactions and proposes a research agenda to undo this compartmentalization. Based on a comprehensive review of policy documents and scholarship on nuclear and environmental security futures between 1990 and 2024, this article documents the compartmentalization of these threats. It shows that prevalent security imaginaries do not account for interactions and instead treat environmental change and nuclear weapons as different types of security threat. This creates a number of epistemic and material vulnerabilities which must be addressed by scholarship. The article lays out avenues to map out material and political interactions between the two threats. It urges policymakers and scholars to integrate imaginations of the implications of these and other existential threats for the future of humanity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48239,"journal":{"name":"Futures","volume":"173 ","pages":"Article 103671"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Existential silos: The compartmentalization of the futures of environmental change and the nuclear threat\",\"authors\":\"Sterre van Buuren ,&nbsp;Thomas Fraise ,&nbsp;Benoît Pelopidas\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.futures.2025.103671\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Nuclear weapons and environmental change are two existential threats to humanity. This article shows that current policy and academic discourse neglects their possible future interactions and proposes a research agenda to undo this compartmentalization. Based on a comprehensive review of policy documents and scholarship on nuclear and environmental security futures between 1990 and 2024, this article documents the compartmentalization of these threats. It shows that prevalent security imaginaries do not account for interactions and instead treat environmental change and nuclear weapons as different types of security threat. This creates a number of epistemic and material vulnerabilities which must be addressed by scholarship. The article lays out avenues to map out material and political interactions between the two threats. It urges policymakers and scholars to integrate imaginations of the implications of these and other existential threats for the future of humanity.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48239,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Futures\",\"volume\":\"173 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103671\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Futures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016328725001338\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Futures","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016328725001338","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

核武器和环境变化是人类面临的两大生存威胁。本文表明,当前的政策和学术话语忽视了它们未来可能的相互作用,并提出了一个研究议程来消除这种划分。本文基于对1990年至2024年间有关核与环境安全未来的政策文件和学术研究的全面回顾,记录了这些威胁的划分。它表明,普遍的安全想象没有考虑到相互作用,而是将环境变化和核武器视为不同类型的安全威胁。这就产生了许多认知和物质上的漏洞,必须由学术来解决。这篇文章列出了两种威胁之间物质和政治互动的途径。它敦促政策制定者和学者整合对这些和其他存在威胁对人类未来的影响的想象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Existential silos: The compartmentalization of the futures of environmental change and the nuclear threat
Nuclear weapons and environmental change are two existential threats to humanity. This article shows that current policy and academic discourse neglects their possible future interactions and proposes a research agenda to undo this compartmentalization. Based on a comprehensive review of policy documents and scholarship on nuclear and environmental security futures between 1990 and 2024, this article documents the compartmentalization of these threats. It shows that prevalent security imaginaries do not account for interactions and instead treat environmental change and nuclear weapons as different types of security threat. This creates a number of epistemic and material vulnerabilities which must be addressed by scholarship. The article lays out avenues to map out material and political interactions between the two threats. It urges policymakers and scholars to integrate imaginations of the implications of these and other existential threats for the future of humanity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Futures
Futures Multiple-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
124
期刊介绍: Futures is an international, refereed, multidisciplinary journal concerned with medium and long-term futures of cultures and societies, science and technology, economics and politics, environment and the planet and individuals and humanity. Covering methods and practices of futures studies, the journal seeks to examine possible and alternative futures of all human endeavours. Futures seeks to promote divergent and pluralistic visions, ideas and opinions about the future. The editors do not necessarily agree with the views expressed in the pages of Futures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信