预测糖尿病视网膜病变视力威胁并发症的进展

IF 4.6 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
C. Quentin Davis PhD , Nadia K. Waheed MD , Mitchell Brigell PhD
{"title":"预测糖尿病视网膜病变视力威胁并发症的进展","authors":"C. Quentin Davis PhD ,&nbsp;Nadia K. Waheed MD ,&nbsp;Mitchell Brigell PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.xops.2025.100859","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To characterize the performance of 56 parameters from electroretinography (ERG)/pupillometry, color fundus photography (FP), OCT angiography (OCTA), and ultra-widefield fluorescein angiography (UWF-FA) for predicting which subjects with nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) will progress to vision-threating complications (VTCs) within 48 weeks.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A longitudinal prospective study from 44 trial sites in the United States.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Subjects had moderate-to-severe NPDR and no center-involved diabetic macular edema. Among the 162 subjects, the mean age was 57 years and 58% were male.</div></div><div><h3>Intervention</h3><div>Although this study tested an experimental drug, there was no indication of a treatment effect. Results are analyzed over all subjects regardless of study treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>Specialized reading centers measured 56 parameters from 4 testing modalities (ERG/pupillometry, FP, OCTA, and UWF-FA) to evaluate diabetic retinopathy (DR) status. Kaplan–Meier analysis and a Cox proportional hazards model were applied to each parameter to identify significant predictors of progression to VTC, defined as progression to proliferative DR, diabetic macular edema, or treatment thereof.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 56 parameters, the strongest predictor of progression in the following 48 weeks was the RETeval DR score, which combines ERG and pupil response. A DR score ≥26.9 had a relative risk (RR) of 5.6 (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001). The most predictive parameter from the other modalities were UWF-FA's total ischemia index ≥0.125 with an RR of 5.3 (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001), OCTA's foveal avascular zone area ≥0.295 mm<sup>2</sup> with an RR of 3.6 (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05), and FP's diabetic retinopathy severity scale ≥47 (moderate NPDR) with an RR of 2.1 (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Both functional (ERG, pupil response) and structural (FP, OCTA, UWF-FA) testing can predict progression to VTC from DR, with the DR score having the best predictive capability. These results suggest it is possible to improve the DR staging system which in turn may enable better allocation of health care resources.</div></div><div><h3>Financial Disclosure(s)</h3><div>Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74363,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmology science","volume":"5 6","pages":"Article 100859"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting Progression to Vision-Threatening Complications in Diabetic Retinopathy\",\"authors\":\"C. Quentin Davis PhD ,&nbsp;Nadia K. Waheed MD ,&nbsp;Mitchell Brigell PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.xops.2025.100859\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To characterize the performance of 56 parameters from electroretinography (ERG)/pupillometry, color fundus photography (FP), OCT angiography (OCTA), and ultra-widefield fluorescein angiography (UWF-FA) for predicting which subjects with nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) will progress to vision-threating complications (VTCs) within 48 weeks.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A longitudinal prospective study from 44 trial sites in the United States.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Subjects had moderate-to-severe NPDR and no center-involved diabetic macular edema. Among the 162 subjects, the mean age was 57 years and 58% were male.</div></div><div><h3>Intervention</h3><div>Although this study tested an experimental drug, there was no indication of a treatment effect. Results are analyzed over all subjects regardless of study treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>Specialized reading centers measured 56 parameters from 4 testing modalities (ERG/pupillometry, FP, OCTA, and UWF-FA) to evaluate diabetic retinopathy (DR) status. Kaplan–Meier analysis and a Cox proportional hazards model were applied to each parameter to identify significant predictors of progression to VTC, defined as progression to proliferative DR, diabetic macular edema, or treatment thereof.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 56 parameters, the strongest predictor of progression in the following 48 weeks was the RETeval DR score, which combines ERG and pupil response. A DR score ≥26.9 had a relative risk (RR) of 5.6 (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001). The most predictive parameter from the other modalities were UWF-FA's total ischemia index ≥0.125 with an RR of 5.3 (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001), OCTA's foveal avascular zone area ≥0.295 mm<sup>2</sup> with an RR of 3.6 (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05), and FP's diabetic retinopathy severity scale ≥47 (moderate NPDR) with an RR of 2.1 (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Both functional (ERG, pupil response) and structural (FP, OCTA, UWF-FA) testing can predict progression to VTC from DR, with the DR score having the best predictive capability. These results suggest it is possible to improve the DR staging system which in turn may enable better allocation of health care resources.</div></div><div><h3>Financial Disclosure(s)</h3><div>Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74363,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ophthalmology science\",\"volume\":\"5 6\",\"pages\":\"Article 100859\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ophthalmology science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666914525001575\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmology science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666914525001575","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评价视网膜电图(ERG)/瞳孔测量、彩色眼底摄影(FP)、OCT血管造影(OCTA)和超宽视场荧光素血管造影(UWF-FA) 56项参数的性能,以预测非增生性糖尿病视网膜病变(NPDR)患者在48周内进展为视力威胁并发症(VTCs)。设计一项来自美国44个试验点的纵向前瞻性研究。受试者有中度至重度NPDR,无中心累及性糖尿病黄斑水肿。162名受试者的平均年龄为57岁,其中58%为男性。干预:虽然这项研究测试了一种实验性药物,但没有迹象表明有治疗效果。对所有受试者的结果进行分析,而不考虑研究治疗方法。主要结果测量:专业阅读中心测量了4种测试方式(ERG/瞳孔测量、FP、OCTA和UWF-FA)中的56个参数来评估糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)状态。对每个参数应用Kaplan-Meier分析和Cox比例风险模型,以确定VTC进展的重要预测因素,VTC的定义为进展为增殖性DR、糖尿病性黄斑水肿或其治疗。结果在56个参数中,在接下来的48周内,RETeval DR评分是最能预测病情进展的指标,它结合了ERG和瞳孔反应。DR评分≥26.9的相对危险度(RR)为5.6 (P <;0.0001)。其他方式最具预测性的参数是UWF-FA的总缺血指数≥0.125,RR为5.3 (P <;0.0001), OCTA中央凹无血管区面积≥0.295 mm2, RR为3.6 (P <;0.05), FP的糖尿病视网膜病变严重程度量表≥47(中度NPDR), RR为2.1 (P <;0.05)。结论功能测试(ERG、瞳孔反应)和结构测试(FP、OCTA、UWF-FA)均可预测DR发展为VTC,其中DR评分预测能力最强。这些结果表明,改进DR分期系统是可能的,从而可以更好地分配卫生保健资源。财务披露专有或商业披露可在本文末尾的脚注和披露中找到。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predicting Progression to Vision-Threatening Complications in Diabetic Retinopathy

Objective

To characterize the performance of 56 parameters from electroretinography (ERG)/pupillometry, color fundus photography (FP), OCT angiography (OCTA), and ultra-widefield fluorescein angiography (UWF-FA) for predicting which subjects with nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) will progress to vision-threating complications (VTCs) within 48 weeks.

Design

A longitudinal prospective study from 44 trial sites in the United States.

Participants

Subjects had moderate-to-severe NPDR and no center-involved diabetic macular edema. Among the 162 subjects, the mean age was 57 years and 58% were male.

Intervention

Although this study tested an experimental drug, there was no indication of a treatment effect. Results are analyzed over all subjects regardless of study treatment.

Main Outcome Measures

Specialized reading centers measured 56 parameters from 4 testing modalities (ERG/pupillometry, FP, OCTA, and UWF-FA) to evaluate diabetic retinopathy (DR) status. Kaplan–Meier analysis and a Cox proportional hazards model were applied to each parameter to identify significant predictors of progression to VTC, defined as progression to proliferative DR, diabetic macular edema, or treatment thereof.

Results

Of the 56 parameters, the strongest predictor of progression in the following 48 weeks was the RETeval DR score, which combines ERG and pupil response. A DR score ≥26.9 had a relative risk (RR) of 5.6 (P < 0.0001). The most predictive parameter from the other modalities were UWF-FA's total ischemia index ≥0.125 with an RR of 5.3 (P < 0.0001), OCTA's foveal avascular zone area ≥0.295 mm2 with an RR of 3.6 (P < 0.05), and FP's diabetic retinopathy severity scale ≥47 (moderate NPDR) with an RR of 2.1 (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

Both functional (ERG, pupil response) and structural (FP, OCTA, UWF-FA) testing can predict progression to VTC from DR, with the DR score having the best predictive capability. These results suggest it is possible to improve the DR staging system which in turn may enable better allocation of health care resources.

Financial Disclosure(s)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ophthalmology science
Ophthalmology science Ophthalmology
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
89 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信