{"title":"级联社会风险:中国非典型电力系统故障的跨空间脆弱性分析","authors":"Mingyu Wu, Xuesong Guo, Yu Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.jup.2025.102011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Atypical large-scale power failure (ALPF) has become more frequent within a risk society, highlighting the need to mitigate cross-spatial cascading risks in order to reduce losses and ensure public safety. This study develops a Cross-Spatial Vulnerability Model (CSVM) to analyse ALPF risks. It combines cascading risk and vulnerability theory with the bow-tie model, forming the basis of a Bayesian network for three ALPF cases in the China scenario, including summer heat and drought, winter cold waves, and coal price fluctuations. The analysis models complete Bayesian networks from official news, policy texts, and expert opinion sources, with three key findings. First, ALPFs can disproportionately impact economic stability, social stability, public health, and safety, with the probability of severe consequences being non-linearly related to the likelihood of ALPF events. Second, effective risk response to ALPFs requires focused attention on several key scenarios, such as delays in emergency response, outdated grid technologies, and restrictions on residential electricity consumption. Third, engineering and non-engineering measures should be integrated, with priority given to ensuring the proper functioning of social and livelihood systems. Unlike previous studies, we focus on the specificity of ALPF events, with a greater emphasis on a case-driven approach, shifting from the engineering and technical tendencies of previous studies to a comprehensive dimension. More consideration is given to the dynamic nature of risk.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23554,"journal":{"name":"Utilities Policy","volume":"96 ","pages":"Article 102011"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cascading social risks: A cross-spatial vulnerability analysis of atypical power system failures in China\",\"authors\":\"Mingyu Wu, Xuesong Guo, Yu Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jup.2025.102011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Atypical large-scale power failure (ALPF) has become more frequent within a risk society, highlighting the need to mitigate cross-spatial cascading risks in order to reduce losses and ensure public safety. This study develops a Cross-Spatial Vulnerability Model (CSVM) to analyse ALPF risks. It combines cascading risk and vulnerability theory with the bow-tie model, forming the basis of a Bayesian network for three ALPF cases in the China scenario, including summer heat and drought, winter cold waves, and coal price fluctuations. The analysis models complete Bayesian networks from official news, policy texts, and expert opinion sources, with three key findings. First, ALPFs can disproportionately impact economic stability, social stability, public health, and safety, with the probability of severe consequences being non-linearly related to the likelihood of ALPF events. Second, effective risk response to ALPFs requires focused attention on several key scenarios, such as delays in emergency response, outdated grid technologies, and restrictions on residential electricity consumption. Third, engineering and non-engineering measures should be integrated, with priority given to ensuring the proper functioning of social and livelihood systems. Unlike previous studies, we focus on the specificity of ALPF events, with a greater emphasis on a case-driven approach, shifting from the engineering and technical tendencies of previous studies to a comprehensive dimension. More consideration is given to the dynamic nature of risk.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23554,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Utilities Policy\",\"volume\":\"96 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102011\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Utilities Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957178725001262\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Utilities Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957178725001262","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Cascading social risks: A cross-spatial vulnerability analysis of atypical power system failures in China
Atypical large-scale power failure (ALPF) has become more frequent within a risk society, highlighting the need to mitigate cross-spatial cascading risks in order to reduce losses and ensure public safety. This study develops a Cross-Spatial Vulnerability Model (CSVM) to analyse ALPF risks. It combines cascading risk and vulnerability theory with the bow-tie model, forming the basis of a Bayesian network for three ALPF cases in the China scenario, including summer heat and drought, winter cold waves, and coal price fluctuations. The analysis models complete Bayesian networks from official news, policy texts, and expert opinion sources, with three key findings. First, ALPFs can disproportionately impact economic stability, social stability, public health, and safety, with the probability of severe consequences being non-linearly related to the likelihood of ALPF events. Second, effective risk response to ALPFs requires focused attention on several key scenarios, such as delays in emergency response, outdated grid technologies, and restrictions on residential electricity consumption. Third, engineering and non-engineering measures should be integrated, with priority given to ensuring the proper functioning of social and livelihood systems. Unlike previous studies, we focus on the specificity of ALPF events, with a greater emphasis on a case-driven approach, shifting from the engineering and technical tendencies of previous studies to a comprehensive dimension. More consideration is given to the dynamic nature of risk.
期刊介绍:
Utilities Policy is deliberately international, interdisciplinary, and intersectoral. Articles address utility trends and issues in both developed and developing economies. Authors and reviewers come from various disciplines, including economics, political science, sociology, law, finance, accounting, management, and engineering. Areas of focus include the utility and network industries providing essential electricity, natural gas, water and wastewater, solid waste, communications, broadband, postal, and public transportation services.
Utilities Policy invites submissions that apply various quantitative and qualitative methods. Contributions are welcome from both established and emerging scholars as well as accomplished practitioners. Interdisciplinary, comparative, and applied works are encouraged. Submissions to the journal should have a clear focus on governance, performance, and/or analysis of public utilities with an aim toward informing the policymaking process and providing recommendations as appropriate. Relevant topics and issues include but are not limited to industry structures and ownership, market design and dynamics, economic development, resource planning, system modeling, accounting and finance, infrastructure investment, supply and demand efficiency, strategic management and productivity, network operations and integration, supply chains, adaptation and flexibility, service-quality standards, benchmarking and metrics, benefit-cost analysis, behavior and incentives, pricing and demand response, economic and environmental regulation, regulatory performance and impact, restructuring and deregulation, and policy institutions.