{"title":"改善静脉高压和下肢溃疡患者长期压迫治疗的一致性:一项德尔福研究-患者队列","authors":"Chloe Jansz , William McGuiness , Sonja Cleary","doi":"10.1016/j.jtv.2025.100947","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Concordance rates for compression therapy (CT) among patients with venous leg ulcers (VLU) have consistently been suboptimal, despite efforts to understand influencing factors [2–4]. VLUs arise as a complication of chronic venous insufficiency (CVI), where venous incompetence or stenosis causes increased capillary permeability, fluid retention, and eventual ulceration [1].</div><div>CT is the established gold standard for managing CVI and preventing VLUs. CT works by enhancing venous return, reducing venous pressure, and minimising stasis. However, ensuring patient concordance to CT remains a challenge.</div><div>A Delphi study explored factors affecting CT concordance among VLU patients. The study identified 16 facilitators and 18 barriers, offering insights into the complexities of patient concordance. The study's analysis using the Kendall W Coefficient showed moderate consensus among participants regarding these influencing factors [9].</div><div>Efforts to improve CT concordance may benefit from addressing the identified barriers while leveraging facilitators, with a focus on personalised care approaches to enhance outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17392,"journal":{"name":"Journal of tissue viability","volume":"34 4","pages":"Article 100947"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving concordance with long-term compression therapy amongst people with venous hypertension and lower leg ulceration: A Delphi study- patient cohort\",\"authors\":\"Chloe Jansz , William McGuiness , Sonja Cleary\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jtv.2025.100947\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Concordance rates for compression therapy (CT) among patients with venous leg ulcers (VLU) have consistently been suboptimal, despite efforts to understand influencing factors [2–4]. VLUs arise as a complication of chronic venous insufficiency (CVI), where venous incompetence or stenosis causes increased capillary permeability, fluid retention, and eventual ulceration [1].</div><div>CT is the established gold standard for managing CVI and preventing VLUs. CT works by enhancing venous return, reducing venous pressure, and minimising stasis. However, ensuring patient concordance to CT remains a challenge.</div><div>A Delphi study explored factors affecting CT concordance among VLU patients. The study identified 16 facilitators and 18 barriers, offering insights into the complexities of patient concordance. The study's analysis using the Kendall W Coefficient showed moderate consensus among participants regarding these influencing factors [9].</div><div>Efforts to improve CT concordance may benefit from addressing the identified barriers while leveraging facilitators, with a focus on personalised care approaches to enhance outcomes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17392,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of tissue viability\",\"volume\":\"34 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 100947\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of tissue viability\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965206X25000956\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of tissue viability","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965206X25000956","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Improving concordance with long-term compression therapy amongst people with venous hypertension and lower leg ulceration: A Delphi study- patient cohort
Concordance rates for compression therapy (CT) among patients with venous leg ulcers (VLU) have consistently been suboptimal, despite efforts to understand influencing factors [2–4]. VLUs arise as a complication of chronic venous insufficiency (CVI), where venous incompetence or stenosis causes increased capillary permeability, fluid retention, and eventual ulceration [1].
CT is the established gold standard for managing CVI and preventing VLUs. CT works by enhancing venous return, reducing venous pressure, and minimising stasis. However, ensuring patient concordance to CT remains a challenge.
A Delphi study explored factors affecting CT concordance among VLU patients. The study identified 16 facilitators and 18 barriers, offering insights into the complexities of patient concordance. The study's analysis using the Kendall W Coefficient showed moderate consensus among participants regarding these influencing factors [9].
Efforts to improve CT concordance may benefit from addressing the identified barriers while leveraging facilitators, with a focus on personalised care approaches to enhance outcomes.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Tissue Viability is the official publication of the Tissue Viability Society and is a quarterly journal concerned with all aspects of the occurrence and treatment of wounds, ulcers and pressure sores including patient care, pain, nutrition, wound healing, research, prevention, mobility, social problems and management.
The Journal particularly encourages papers covering skin and skin wounds but will consider articles that discuss injury in any tissue. Articles that stress the multi-professional nature of tissue viability are especially welcome. We seek to encourage new authors as well as well-established contributors to the field - one aim of the journal is to enable all participants in tissue viability to share information with colleagues.