{"title":"不同的斜坡适合不同的人:不同的社会人口群体的步行能力-步行关联的变化","authors":"Lindsay M. Braun","doi":"10.1016/j.trd.2025.104914","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Past research suggests that walkability may be a weaker predictor of walking behavior for marginalized groups. While some studies have discussed potential reasons for this difference, few have tested them empirically. I address this gap using the 2017 National Household Travel Survey (n = 148,480), asking: (1) Do associations between walkability and walking differ across sociodemographic groups? (2) If so, what are the potential explanations? Using logistic regression models with interaction terms, I assess how associations between an objective walkability index (exposure) and utilitarian walking (outcome) vary by race/ethnicity and income, then examine how these differences are moderated by financial constraints and environmental barriers. The results show (1) weaker associations between walkability and walking for Black, Hispanic, and lower-income individuals and (2) differences in potential explanations for these results by race (infrastructure/safety disparities) vs. income (low vehicle access). These findings highlight the importance of differentiated strategies to promote walking across sociodemographic contexts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23277,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment","volume":"147 ","pages":"Article 104914"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Different slopes for different folks: Variations in walkability-walking associations across sociodemographic groups\",\"authors\":\"Lindsay M. Braun\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.trd.2025.104914\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Past research suggests that walkability may be a weaker predictor of walking behavior for marginalized groups. While some studies have discussed potential reasons for this difference, few have tested them empirically. I address this gap using the 2017 National Household Travel Survey (n = 148,480), asking: (1) Do associations between walkability and walking differ across sociodemographic groups? (2) If so, what are the potential explanations? Using logistic regression models with interaction terms, I assess how associations between an objective walkability index (exposure) and utilitarian walking (outcome) vary by race/ethnicity and income, then examine how these differences are moderated by financial constraints and environmental barriers. The results show (1) weaker associations between walkability and walking for Black, Hispanic, and lower-income individuals and (2) differences in potential explanations for these results by race (infrastructure/safety disparities) vs. income (low vehicle access). These findings highlight the importance of differentiated strategies to promote walking across sociodemographic contexts.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23277,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment\",\"volume\":\"147 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104914\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1361920925003244\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1361920925003244","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Different slopes for different folks: Variations in walkability-walking associations across sociodemographic groups
Past research suggests that walkability may be a weaker predictor of walking behavior for marginalized groups. While some studies have discussed potential reasons for this difference, few have tested them empirically. I address this gap using the 2017 National Household Travel Survey (n = 148,480), asking: (1) Do associations between walkability and walking differ across sociodemographic groups? (2) If so, what are the potential explanations? Using logistic regression models with interaction terms, I assess how associations between an objective walkability index (exposure) and utilitarian walking (outcome) vary by race/ethnicity and income, then examine how these differences are moderated by financial constraints and environmental barriers. The results show (1) weaker associations between walkability and walking for Black, Hispanic, and lower-income individuals and (2) differences in potential explanations for these results by race (infrastructure/safety disparities) vs. income (low vehicle access). These findings highlight the importance of differentiated strategies to promote walking across sociodemographic contexts.
期刊介绍:
Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment focuses on original research exploring the environmental impacts of transportation, policy responses to these impacts, and their implications for transportation system design, planning, and management. The journal comprehensively covers the interaction between transportation and the environment, ranging from local effects on specific geographical areas to global implications such as natural resource depletion and atmospheric pollution.
We welcome research papers across all transportation modes, including maritime, air, and land transportation, assessing their environmental impacts broadly. Papers addressing both mobile aspects and transportation infrastructure are considered. The journal prioritizes empirical findings and policy responses of regulatory, planning, technical, or fiscal nature. Articles are policy-driven, accessible, and applicable to readers from diverse disciplines, emphasizing relevance and practicality. We encourage interdisciplinary submissions and welcome contributions from economically developing and advanced countries alike, reflecting our international orientation.