{"title":"孕妇身体形象的三方影响模型检验","authors":"Cristian Di Gesto , Catherine Preston , Amanda Nerini , Camilla Matera , Caterina Grano","doi":"10.1016/j.bodyim.2025.101947","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Tripartite Influence Model provides a robust framework for understanding how sociocultural pressures, mediated by psychological processes, contribute to body dissatisfaction. The present study aimed to test this model among pregnant women, in which media, peers, family and significant others pressures were associated with body dissatisfaction via physical appearance comparison and thin-ideal internalization. We predicted that all sociocultural sources of influence would be associated with body dissatisfaction both directly and indirectly. Participants (309 pregnant women, mean-age: 32.9 years) completed a questionnaire containing the Sociocultural Attitudes Towards Appearance Questionnaire-4R, the Physical-Appearance Comparison Scale, and the Body-Shape Questionnaire-14. A path analysis was performed in which media, peers, family and significant others pressures were posited as predictors of the physical appearance comparison, thin-ideal internalization and body dissatisfaction, respectively. We found that only media and family pressures were directly related to body dissatisfaction. Moreover, the indirect effect of both media and significant others pressures on body dissatisfaction through physical appearance comparison and thin-ideal internalization was significant. Peer pressures (i.e., perceived expectations and evaluative comments) were not associated with body dissatisfaction either directly or indirectly. Overall, these findings provide information about the role that sociocultural pressures, particularly those from media, family and significant others, play in shaping body dissatisfaction among pregnant women. The study highlighted the importance for healthcare professionals to address the impact of societal beauty ideals on pregnant women’s mental health and body image. Healthcare providers might consider incorporating psychological assessments into prenatal care to identify women at risk of heightened body dissatisfaction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48312,"journal":{"name":"Body Image","volume":"54 ","pages":"Article 101947"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Testing the tripartite influence model on body image among pregnant women\",\"authors\":\"Cristian Di Gesto , Catherine Preston , Amanda Nerini , Camilla Matera , Caterina Grano\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bodyim.2025.101947\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The Tripartite Influence Model provides a robust framework for understanding how sociocultural pressures, mediated by psychological processes, contribute to body dissatisfaction. The present study aimed to test this model among pregnant women, in which media, peers, family and significant others pressures were associated with body dissatisfaction via physical appearance comparison and thin-ideal internalization. We predicted that all sociocultural sources of influence would be associated with body dissatisfaction both directly and indirectly. Participants (309 pregnant women, mean-age: 32.9 years) completed a questionnaire containing the Sociocultural Attitudes Towards Appearance Questionnaire-4R, the Physical-Appearance Comparison Scale, and the Body-Shape Questionnaire-14. A path analysis was performed in which media, peers, family and significant others pressures were posited as predictors of the physical appearance comparison, thin-ideal internalization and body dissatisfaction, respectively. We found that only media and family pressures were directly related to body dissatisfaction. Moreover, the indirect effect of both media and significant others pressures on body dissatisfaction through physical appearance comparison and thin-ideal internalization was significant. Peer pressures (i.e., perceived expectations and evaluative comments) were not associated with body dissatisfaction either directly or indirectly. Overall, these findings provide information about the role that sociocultural pressures, particularly those from media, family and significant others, play in shaping body dissatisfaction among pregnant women. The study highlighted the importance for healthcare professionals to address the impact of societal beauty ideals on pregnant women’s mental health and body image. Healthcare providers might consider incorporating psychological assessments into prenatal care to identify women at risk of heightened body dissatisfaction.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48312,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Body Image\",\"volume\":\"54 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101947\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Body Image\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1740144525000981\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Body Image","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1740144525000981","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Testing the tripartite influence model on body image among pregnant women
The Tripartite Influence Model provides a robust framework for understanding how sociocultural pressures, mediated by psychological processes, contribute to body dissatisfaction. The present study aimed to test this model among pregnant women, in which media, peers, family and significant others pressures were associated with body dissatisfaction via physical appearance comparison and thin-ideal internalization. We predicted that all sociocultural sources of influence would be associated with body dissatisfaction both directly and indirectly. Participants (309 pregnant women, mean-age: 32.9 years) completed a questionnaire containing the Sociocultural Attitudes Towards Appearance Questionnaire-4R, the Physical-Appearance Comparison Scale, and the Body-Shape Questionnaire-14. A path analysis was performed in which media, peers, family and significant others pressures were posited as predictors of the physical appearance comparison, thin-ideal internalization and body dissatisfaction, respectively. We found that only media and family pressures were directly related to body dissatisfaction. Moreover, the indirect effect of both media and significant others pressures on body dissatisfaction through physical appearance comparison and thin-ideal internalization was significant. Peer pressures (i.e., perceived expectations and evaluative comments) were not associated with body dissatisfaction either directly or indirectly. Overall, these findings provide information about the role that sociocultural pressures, particularly those from media, family and significant others, play in shaping body dissatisfaction among pregnant women. The study highlighted the importance for healthcare professionals to address the impact of societal beauty ideals on pregnant women’s mental health and body image. Healthcare providers might consider incorporating psychological assessments into prenatal care to identify women at risk of heightened body dissatisfaction.
期刊介绍:
Body Image is an international, peer-reviewed journal that publishes high-quality, scientific articles on body image and human physical appearance. Body Image is a multi-faceted concept that refers to persons perceptions and attitudes about their own body, particularly but not exclusively its appearance. The journal invites contributions from a broad range of disciplines-psychological science, other social and behavioral sciences, and medical and health sciences. The journal publishes original research articles, brief research reports, theoretical and review papers, and science-based practitioner reports of interest. Dissertation abstracts are also published online, and the journal gives an annual award for the best doctoral dissertation in this field.