水库流域土壤侵蚀危险区优先排序的多标准地理空间分析

IF 1.5 4区 地球科学 Q3 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Vinicius Soares Campos, Tárcio Rocha Lopes , Mateus de Oliveira Macedo, Fernando Simões Santos, Joyce Alchapar Silva, João Paulo Francisco, Fabricio Leite
{"title":"水库流域土壤侵蚀危险区优先排序的多标准地理空间分析","authors":"Vinicius Soares Campos,&nbsp;Tárcio Rocha Lopes ,&nbsp;Mateus de Oliveira Macedo,&nbsp;Fernando Simões Santos,&nbsp;Joyce Alchapar Silva,&nbsp;João Paulo Francisco,&nbsp;Fabricio Leite","doi":"10.1016/j.jsames.2025.105714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Soil erosion is a serious threat to sustainable land use management, making the identification of erosion-prone areas increasingly important. This study aimed to identify areas with riska to soil erosion in the Piquiri River basin, a significant tributary of the Paraná River and a key contributor to the Itaipu Hydroelectric Plant reservoir. A Multi-Criteria Analysis (MCA) integrated with geospatial techniques was used to map areas most susceptible to erosion. Several factors were considered: topography, land use and cover, soil erodibility, landslide susceptibility, proximity to rivers, time of concentration, and pasture quality. The criteria were analyzed using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), which allowed for weighting the relative importance of each factor based on expert consultation. The factors were combined using two multi-criteria methods: Weighted Linear Combination (WLC) and Ordered Weighted Averaging (OWA). The maps indicated that the highest erosion risk areas are mainly concentrated in the upper and middle parts of the basin, associated with steep slopes and degraded pastures. Furthermore, it was found that regions close to rivers also presented high priority for intervention. The OWA method, by varying the level of risk and compensation, made it possible to simulate different decision-making scenarios. The methods were compared with MUSLE and similarity was verified between the priority areas estimated by multicriteria analysis and soil loss. The study concludes that multicriteria techniques, integrated with geospatial tools, are effective in identifying priority areas for intervention, supporting soil conservation and erosion mitigation actions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50047,"journal":{"name":"Journal of South American Earth Sciences","volume":"165 ","pages":"Article 105714"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multicriteria geospatial analysis for prioritizing soil erosion risk areas in a reservoir-contributing watershed\",\"authors\":\"Vinicius Soares Campos,&nbsp;Tárcio Rocha Lopes ,&nbsp;Mateus de Oliveira Macedo,&nbsp;Fernando Simões Santos,&nbsp;Joyce Alchapar Silva,&nbsp;João Paulo Francisco,&nbsp;Fabricio Leite\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jsames.2025.105714\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Soil erosion is a serious threat to sustainable land use management, making the identification of erosion-prone areas increasingly important. This study aimed to identify areas with riska to soil erosion in the Piquiri River basin, a significant tributary of the Paraná River and a key contributor to the Itaipu Hydroelectric Plant reservoir. A Multi-Criteria Analysis (MCA) integrated with geospatial techniques was used to map areas most susceptible to erosion. Several factors were considered: topography, land use and cover, soil erodibility, landslide susceptibility, proximity to rivers, time of concentration, and pasture quality. The criteria were analyzed using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), which allowed for weighting the relative importance of each factor based on expert consultation. The factors were combined using two multi-criteria methods: Weighted Linear Combination (WLC) and Ordered Weighted Averaging (OWA). The maps indicated that the highest erosion risk areas are mainly concentrated in the upper and middle parts of the basin, associated with steep slopes and degraded pastures. Furthermore, it was found that regions close to rivers also presented high priority for intervention. The OWA method, by varying the level of risk and compensation, made it possible to simulate different decision-making scenarios. The methods were compared with MUSLE and similarity was verified between the priority areas estimated by multicriteria analysis and soil loss. The study concludes that multicriteria techniques, integrated with geospatial tools, are effective in identifying priority areas for intervention, supporting soil conservation and erosion mitigation actions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50047,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of South American Earth Sciences\",\"volume\":\"165 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105714\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of South American Earth Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0895981125003761\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of South American Earth Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0895981125003761","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

土壤侵蚀是对可持续土地利用管理的严重威胁,因此确定易受侵蚀地区变得越来越重要。本研究旨在确定皮奎里河流域存在土壤侵蚀风险的地区,皮奎里河是帕拉纳河的重要支流,也是伊泰普水电站水库的主要贡献者。多标准分析(MCA)与地理空间技术相结合,用于绘制最易受侵蚀的地区。考虑了几个因素:地形、土地利用和覆盖、土壤可蚀性、滑坡易感性、靠近河流、集中时间和牧场质量。使用层次分析法(AHP)对标准进行分析,该方法允许在专家咨询的基础上对每个因素的相对重要性进行加权。采用加权线性组合(WLC)和有序加权平均(OWA)两种多准则方法对各因子进行组合。土壤侵蚀风险最高的地区主要集中在流域中上游,伴有陡坡和退化草场。此外,靠近河流的区域也具有较高的干预优先级。OWA方法通过改变风险和补偿水平,使模拟不同的决策情景成为可能。将这些方法与MUSLE方法进行比较,验证了多准则分析估算的优先区域与土壤流失量之间的相似性。该研究的结论是,多标准技术与地理空间工具相结合,在确定优先干预领域、支持水土保持和减缓侵蚀行动方面是有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multicriteria geospatial analysis for prioritizing soil erosion risk areas in a reservoir-contributing watershed
Soil erosion is a serious threat to sustainable land use management, making the identification of erosion-prone areas increasingly important. This study aimed to identify areas with riska to soil erosion in the Piquiri River basin, a significant tributary of the Paraná River and a key contributor to the Itaipu Hydroelectric Plant reservoir. A Multi-Criteria Analysis (MCA) integrated with geospatial techniques was used to map areas most susceptible to erosion. Several factors were considered: topography, land use and cover, soil erodibility, landslide susceptibility, proximity to rivers, time of concentration, and pasture quality. The criteria were analyzed using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), which allowed for weighting the relative importance of each factor based on expert consultation. The factors were combined using two multi-criteria methods: Weighted Linear Combination (WLC) and Ordered Weighted Averaging (OWA). The maps indicated that the highest erosion risk areas are mainly concentrated in the upper and middle parts of the basin, associated with steep slopes and degraded pastures. Furthermore, it was found that regions close to rivers also presented high priority for intervention. The OWA method, by varying the level of risk and compensation, made it possible to simulate different decision-making scenarios. The methods were compared with MUSLE and similarity was verified between the priority areas estimated by multicriteria analysis and soil loss. The study concludes that multicriteria techniques, integrated with geospatial tools, are effective in identifying priority areas for intervention, supporting soil conservation and erosion mitigation actions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of South American Earth Sciences
Journal of South American Earth Sciences 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
22.20%
发文量
364
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Papers must have a regional appeal and should present work of more than local significance. Research papers dealing with the regional geology of South American cratons and mobile belts, within the following research fields: -Economic geology, metallogenesis and hydrocarbon genesis and reservoirs. -Geophysics, geochemistry, volcanology, igneous and metamorphic petrology. -Tectonics, neo- and seismotectonics and geodynamic modeling. -Geomorphology, geological hazards, environmental geology, climate change in America and Antarctica, and soil research. -Stratigraphy, sedimentology, structure and basin evolution. -Paleontology, paleoecology, paleoclimatology and Quaternary geology. New developments in already established regional projects and new initiatives dealing with the geology of the continent will be summarized and presented on a regular basis. Short notes, discussions, book reviews and conference and workshop reports will also be included when relevant.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信