Dured Dardari, Louis Potier, Ariane Sultan, Maud Francois, Jocelyne M'Bemba, Benjamin Bouillet, Lucy Chaillous, Laurence Kessler, Aurélie Carlier, Abdulkader Jalek, Ayoub Sbaa, Hilmar Kjartansson, Baldur Tumi Baldursson, Guillaume Charpentier, John C Lantis
{"title":"完整鱼皮移植治疗糖尿病足溃疡:KEREFISH随机对照试验的结果。","authors":"Dured Dardari, Louis Potier, Ariane Sultan, Maud Francois, Jocelyne M'Bemba, Benjamin Bouillet, Lucy Chaillous, Laurence Kessler, Aurélie Carlier, Abdulkader Jalek, Ayoub Sbaa, Hilmar Kjartansson, Baldur Tumi Baldursson, Guillaume Charpentier, John C Lantis","doi":"10.1016/j.diabet.2025.101691","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The main objective : To assess the efficacy of Intact fish skin graft (IFSG) for the closure of University of Texas (UT) Grade 2 and 3 Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) versus local standard of care (SOC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the French subgroup of a multinational randomized trial, 180 (179 in primary endpoint analysis) patients with UT grade 2 and 3 DFUs (8 centers) were randomized to receive IFSG or SOC, that adhered to the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF) guidelines. Primary endpoint was complete epithelialization at 16 weeks. Secondary endpoints were healing curve, percentage of wounds healed to 80 % or more in an average of 16 weeks, percentage healed at 20 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The primary endpoint was 41.6 % closure rate in IFSG group versus 22.2 % in SOC group (P = 0.0053). In the intent to treat analysis (ITT), there was a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) in mean relative wound area between the IFSG and SOC arms at weeks 6.The proportion of patients with complete epithelialization at 20 weeks was 2.11 times higher in the IFSG group than in the SOC group. For those patients that healed a median of 7 graft applications was required.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In France, the addition of IFSG to the care plan of patients with deep diabetic foot wounds improved the closure rate by 41.6 % in IFSG group versus 22.2 % in SOC.</p>","PeriodicalId":101305,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes & metabolism","volume":" ","pages":"101691"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intact fish skin graft for deep diabetic foot ulcers: results from the KEREFISH randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Dured Dardari, Louis Potier, Ariane Sultan, Maud Francois, Jocelyne M'Bemba, Benjamin Bouillet, Lucy Chaillous, Laurence Kessler, Aurélie Carlier, Abdulkader Jalek, Ayoub Sbaa, Hilmar Kjartansson, Baldur Tumi Baldursson, Guillaume Charpentier, John C Lantis\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.diabet.2025.101691\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The main objective : To assess the efficacy of Intact fish skin graft (IFSG) for the closure of University of Texas (UT) Grade 2 and 3 Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) versus local standard of care (SOC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the French subgroup of a multinational randomized trial, 180 (179 in primary endpoint analysis) patients with UT grade 2 and 3 DFUs (8 centers) were randomized to receive IFSG or SOC, that adhered to the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF) guidelines. Primary endpoint was complete epithelialization at 16 weeks. Secondary endpoints were healing curve, percentage of wounds healed to 80 % or more in an average of 16 weeks, percentage healed at 20 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The primary endpoint was 41.6 % closure rate in IFSG group versus 22.2 % in SOC group (P = 0.0053). In the intent to treat analysis (ITT), there was a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) in mean relative wound area between the IFSG and SOC arms at weeks 6.The proportion of patients with complete epithelialization at 20 weeks was 2.11 times higher in the IFSG group than in the SOC group. For those patients that healed a median of 7 graft applications was required.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In France, the addition of IFSG to the care plan of patients with deep diabetic foot wounds improved the closure rate by 41.6 % in IFSG group versus 22.2 % in SOC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101305,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetes & metabolism\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"101691\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetes & metabolism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabet.2025.101691\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes & metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabet.2025.101691","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Intact fish skin graft for deep diabetic foot ulcers: results from the KEREFISH randomized controlled trial.
Introduction: The main objective : To assess the efficacy of Intact fish skin graft (IFSG) for the closure of University of Texas (UT) Grade 2 and 3 Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) versus local standard of care (SOC).
Methods: In the French subgroup of a multinational randomized trial, 180 (179 in primary endpoint analysis) patients with UT grade 2 and 3 DFUs (8 centers) were randomized to receive IFSG or SOC, that adhered to the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF) guidelines. Primary endpoint was complete epithelialization at 16 weeks. Secondary endpoints were healing curve, percentage of wounds healed to 80 % or more in an average of 16 weeks, percentage healed at 20 weeks.
Results: The primary endpoint was 41.6 % closure rate in IFSG group versus 22.2 % in SOC group (P = 0.0053). In the intent to treat analysis (ITT), there was a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) in mean relative wound area between the IFSG and SOC arms at weeks 6.The proportion of patients with complete epithelialization at 20 weeks was 2.11 times higher in the IFSG group than in the SOC group. For those patients that healed a median of 7 graft applications was required.
Conclusions: In France, the addition of IFSG to the care plan of patients with deep diabetic foot wounds improved the closure rate by 41.6 % in IFSG group versus 22.2 % in SOC.