家属对重症COVID-19患者临终讨论和复苏令的满意度:沙特阿拉伯的一项多中心研究

IF 3.1 1区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS
Mobeireek A, Al-Jahdali H, AlJohaney A, Al-Rajhi N, Al-Fadhli S, Lababidi H, Al-Firm A, AlFattani A, Ahmed L
{"title":"家属对重症COVID-19患者临终讨论和复苏令的满意度:沙特阿拉伯的一项多中心研究","authors":"Mobeireek A, Al-Jahdali H, AlJohaney A, Al-Rajhi N, Al-Fadhli S, Lababidi H, Al-Firm A, AlFattani A, Ahmed L","doi":"10.1186/s12910-025-01248-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the significant mortality, data on end-of-life (EoL) discussions during COVID-19 pandemic are scarce. Health care providers had to cope with significant challenges, particularly overcoming barriers to effective communication with patients and their families, and lack of information on therapy and prognosis. This study was undertaken to assess the satisfaction of close family members (CFMs) with EoL discussions for patients hospitalized with severe COVID-19 infection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was conducted in five major hospitals in Saudi Arabia. Medical charts of consecutive patients who died from COVID-19 complications were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic and clinical data were collected, and communication with close family members (CFMs) about clinical decisions were evaluated. A follow-up telephone interview was conducted using a validated Arabic questionnaire to evaluate satisfaction of CFMs with the EoL discussions prior death.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>EoL discussions were documented in less than half (67, 49.28%) and were often delayed (the median time 19.75 days [range 1-119] after admission. However, in the interviews of the CFMs, 109 of 136 (80.15%) acknowledged that physicians had shared with them information regarding the medical condition of the patient. Most of these discussions were conducted with the CFMs rather than the patients. Do Not Attempt Resuscitation orders were implemented in half of the patients, and most CFMs (70%) felt they were appropriate. Satisfaction levels for physicians, were as follows: 61.68% for the adequacy of information provided, 60.00% for time spent, and 61.49% for empathy from physicians. A strong correlation existed between the time spent and both the adequacy of information (rs = 0.89, p < 0.001) and empathy (rs = 0.82, p < 0.001). As for nursing performance, satisfaction was 47.83% for information, 48.06% for time, and 55.81% for empathy. Physicians' scores were significantly higher than nurses on information sharing (P = 0.022) and time spent (P = 0.05), but there was not significant difference with regards to empathy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite the challenges associated with the pandemic, there is room for improvement in EoL discussions, particularly the early introduction of personalized goal-oriented care plans. Defining roles and fostering interdisciplinary collaboration between healthcare professionals may enhance satisfaction of patients and their families.</p>","PeriodicalId":55348,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Ethics","volume":"26 1","pages":"107"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12297854/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Family satisfaction with the end-of-life discussions and resuscitation orders for patients with severe COVID-19: a multicenter study in Saudi Arabia.\",\"authors\":\"Mobeireek A, Al-Jahdali H, AlJohaney A, Al-Rajhi N, Al-Fadhli S, Lababidi H, Al-Firm A, AlFattani A, Ahmed L\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12910-025-01248-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the significant mortality, data on end-of-life (EoL) discussions during COVID-19 pandemic are scarce. Health care providers had to cope with significant challenges, particularly overcoming barriers to effective communication with patients and their families, and lack of information on therapy and prognosis. This study was undertaken to assess the satisfaction of close family members (CFMs) with EoL discussions for patients hospitalized with severe COVID-19 infection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was conducted in five major hospitals in Saudi Arabia. Medical charts of consecutive patients who died from COVID-19 complications were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic and clinical data were collected, and communication with close family members (CFMs) about clinical decisions were evaluated. A follow-up telephone interview was conducted using a validated Arabic questionnaire to evaluate satisfaction of CFMs with the EoL discussions prior death.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>EoL discussions were documented in less than half (67, 49.28%) and were often delayed (the median time 19.75 days [range 1-119] after admission. However, in the interviews of the CFMs, 109 of 136 (80.15%) acknowledged that physicians had shared with them information regarding the medical condition of the patient. Most of these discussions were conducted with the CFMs rather than the patients. Do Not Attempt Resuscitation orders were implemented in half of the patients, and most CFMs (70%) felt they were appropriate. Satisfaction levels for physicians, were as follows: 61.68% for the adequacy of information provided, 60.00% for time spent, and 61.49% for empathy from physicians. A strong correlation existed between the time spent and both the adequacy of information (rs = 0.89, p < 0.001) and empathy (rs = 0.82, p < 0.001). As for nursing performance, satisfaction was 47.83% for information, 48.06% for time, and 55.81% for empathy. Physicians' scores were significantly higher than nurses on information sharing (P = 0.022) and time spent (P = 0.05), but there was not significant difference with regards to empathy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite the challenges associated with the pandemic, there is room for improvement in EoL discussions, particularly the early introduction of personalized goal-oriented care plans. Defining roles and fostering interdisciplinary collaboration between healthcare professionals may enhance satisfaction of patients and their families.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55348,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Medical Ethics\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"107\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12297854/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Medical Ethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-025-01248-8\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-025-01248-8","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管死亡率很高,但关于COVID-19大流行期间生命末期(EoL)讨论的数据很少。卫生保健提供者必须应对重大挑战,特别是克服与病人及其家属进行有效沟通的障碍,以及缺乏关于治疗和预后的信息。本研究旨在评估重症COVID-19感染住院患者近亲属对EoL讨论的满意度。方法:本研究在沙特阿拉伯的五家主要医院进行。回顾性分析连续死于COVID-19并发症患者的病历。收集人口统计学和临床数据,并评估与亲密家庭成员(CFMs)关于临床决策的沟通。使用经过验证的阿拉伯语问卷进行随访电话访谈,以评估cfm对死亡前EoL讨论的满意度。结果:不到一半(67.49.28%)的患者记录了EoL讨论,并且通常延迟(入院后中位时间19.75天[范围1-119])。然而,在对136名cfm的访谈中,109名(80.15%)承认医生与他们分享了有关患者医疗状况的信息。这些讨论大多是与cfm而不是患者进行的。半数患者实施了“不要尝试复苏”命令,大多数cfm(70%)认为这是适当的。医生的满意度水平如下:提供信息的充分性为61.68%,花费的时间为60.00%,医生的同理心为61.49%。所花费的时间与信息的充足性之间存在很强的相关性(rs = 0.89, p)。结论:尽管与大流行相关的挑战,但EoL讨论仍有改进的空间,特别是早期引入个性化的目标导向的护理计划。定义角色和促进医疗保健专业人员之间的跨学科合作可以提高患者及其家属的满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Family satisfaction with the end-of-life discussions and resuscitation orders for patients with severe COVID-19: a multicenter study in Saudi Arabia.

Family satisfaction with the end-of-life discussions and resuscitation orders for patients with severe COVID-19: a multicenter study in Saudi Arabia.

Background: Despite the significant mortality, data on end-of-life (EoL) discussions during COVID-19 pandemic are scarce. Health care providers had to cope with significant challenges, particularly overcoming barriers to effective communication with patients and their families, and lack of information on therapy and prognosis. This study was undertaken to assess the satisfaction of close family members (CFMs) with EoL discussions for patients hospitalized with severe COVID-19 infection.

Methods: The study was conducted in five major hospitals in Saudi Arabia. Medical charts of consecutive patients who died from COVID-19 complications were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic and clinical data were collected, and communication with close family members (CFMs) about clinical decisions were evaluated. A follow-up telephone interview was conducted using a validated Arabic questionnaire to evaluate satisfaction of CFMs with the EoL discussions prior death.

Results: EoL discussions were documented in less than half (67, 49.28%) and were often delayed (the median time 19.75 days [range 1-119] after admission. However, in the interviews of the CFMs, 109 of 136 (80.15%) acknowledged that physicians had shared with them information regarding the medical condition of the patient. Most of these discussions were conducted with the CFMs rather than the patients. Do Not Attempt Resuscitation orders were implemented in half of the patients, and most CFMs (70%) felt they were appropriate. Satisfaction levels for physicians, were as follows: 61.68% for the adequacy of information provided, 60.00% for time spent, and 61.49% for empathy from physicians. A strong correlation existed between the time spent and both the adequacy of information (rs = 0.89, p < 0.001) and empathy (rs = 0.82, p < 0.001). As for nursing performance, satisfaction was 47.83% for information, 48.06% for time, and 55.81% for empathy. Physicians' scores were significantly higher than nurses on information sharing (P = 0.022) and time spent (P = 0.05), but there was not significant difference with regards to empathy.

Conclusion: Despite the challenges associated with the pandemic, there is room for improvement in EoL discussions, particularly the early introduction of personalized goal-oriented care plans. Defining roles and fostering interdisciplinary collaboration between healthcare professionals may enhance satisfaction of patients and their families.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medical Ethics
BMC Medical Ethics MEDICAL ETHICS-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
7.40%
发文量
108
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Ethics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the ethical aspects of biomedical research and clinical practice, including professional choices and conduct, medical technologies, healthcare systems and health policies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信