{"title":"耳部手术中的机器人和计算机辅助技术。","authors":"Takeshi Fujita , Taku Ito , Masaya Uchida , Hajime Koyama , Masahiro Takahashi , Takara Nakazawa , Takashi Fujiwara , Nozomu Matsumoto , Tadao Yoshida , Naohiro Yoshida , Seiji Kakehata , Manabu Komori , Naohito Hato","doi":"10.1016/j.anl.2025.06.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Robotic and computer-assisted systems for ear surgery are receiving growing attention as tools to overcome the challenges intrinsic to the delicate, restricted operative field of the middle and inner ear. This review highlights recent advances in robotic platforms, clinical outcomes, and emerging technologies such as augmented reality (AR), virtual reality (VR), and artificial intelligence (AI). Multiple groups worldwide have introduced robotic devices that aid or automate tasks like mastoid drilling, stapes footplate fenestration, and cochlear implant (CI) electrode insertion. Seminal studies involving systems such as HEARO, iotaSoft, and RobOtol reveal sub-millimeter accuracy and minimized trauma during CI, suggesting the potential to reduce postoperative complications and improve hearing preservation.</div><div>Although these technologies have progressed from proof-of-concept prototypes to early clinical usage, significant barriers remain before they become routine. Cost is a key concern, given the relatively small patient population for otologic procedures compared to other surgical fields. Regulatory pathways also require strict safety validations, particularly for semi-autonomous or fully autonomous functions. Nevertheless, FDA and European CE approvals for certain robotic systems illustrate their growing feasibility. Meanwhile, AR- and VR-based navigation is improving intraoperative visualization by overlaying critical structures such as the facial nerve onto the surgeon’s field, while AI-driven algorithms for instrument tracking and real-time monitoring offer further enhancements in safety and precision. In addition, simulation-based training in VR environments can accelerate surgical expertise and reduce learning curves.</div><div>Larger-scale clinical trials that directly compare robotic and conventional approaches are still needed to quantify benefits related to complication rates, operative times, and long-term auditory outcomes. Ongoing innovations in software integration and miniaturized hardware are likely to broaden the range of feasible robotic tasks within the ear’s narrow anatomical boundaries.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55627,"journal":{"name":"Auris Nasus Larynx","volume":"52 4","pages":"Pages 496-501"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Robotic and computer-assisted techniques in ear surgery\",\"authors\":\"Takeshi Fujita , Taku Ito , Masaya Uchida , Hajime Koyama , Masahiro Takahashi , Takara Nakazawa , Takashi Fujiwara , Nozomu Matsumoto , Tadao Yoshida , Naohiro Yoshida , Seiji Kakehata , Manabu Komori , Naohito Hato\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.anl.2025.06.013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Robotic and computer-assisted systems for ear surgery are receiving growing attention as tools to overcome the challenges intrinsic to the delicate, restricted operative field of the middle and inner ear. This review highlights recent advances in robotic platforms, clinical outcomes, and emerging technologies such as augmented reality (AR), virtual reality (VR), and artificial intelligence (AI). Multiple groups worldwide have introduced robotic devices that aid or automate tasks like mastoid drilling, stapes footplate fenestration, and cochlear implant (CI) electrode insertion. Seminal studies involving systems such as HEARO, iotaSoft, and RobOtol reveal sub-millimeter accuracy and minimized trauma during CI, suggesting the potential to reduce postoperative complications and improve hearing preservation.</div><div>Although these technologies have progressed from proof-of-concept prototypes to early clinical usage, significant barriers remain before they become routine. Cost is a key concern, given the relatively small patient population for otologic procedures compared to other surgical fields. Regulatory pathways also require strict safety validations, particularly for semi-autonomous or fully autonomous functions. Nevertheless, FDA and European CE approvals for certain robotic systems illustrate their growing feasibility. Meanwhile, AR- and VR-based navigation is improving intraoperative visualization by overlaying critical structures such as the facial nerve onto the surgeon’s field, while AI-driven algorithms for instrument tracking and real-time monitoring offer further enhancements in safety and precision. In addition, simulation-based training in VR environments can accelerate surgical expertise and reduce learning curves.</div><div>Larger-scale clinical trials that directly compare robotic and conventional approaches are still needed to quantify benefits related to complication rates, operative times, and long-term auditory outcomes. Ongoing innovations in software integration and miniaturized hardware are likely to broaden the range of feasible robotic tasks within the ear’s narrow anatomical boundaries.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55627,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Auris Nasus Larynx\",\"volume\":\"52 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 496-501\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Auris Nasus Larynx\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0385814625001014\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Auris Nasus Larynx","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0385814625001014","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Robotic and computer-assisted techniques in ear surgery
Robotic and computer-assisted systems for ear surgery are receiving growing attention as tools to overcome the challenges intrinsic to the delicate, restricted operative field of the middle and inner ear. This review highlights recent advances in robotic platforms, clinical outcomes, and emerging technologies such as augmented reality (AR), virtual reality (VR), and artificial intelligence (AI). Multiple groups worldwide have introduced robotic devices that aid or automate tasks like mastoid drilling, stapes footplate fenestration, and cochlear implant (CI) electrode insertion. Seminal studies involving systems such as HEARO, iotaSoft, and RobOtol reveal sub-millimeter accuracy and minimized trauma during CI, suggesting the potential to reduce postoperative complications and improve hearing preservation.
Although these technologies have progressed from proof-of-concept prototypes to early clinical usage, significant barriers remain before they become routine. Cost is a key concern, given the relatively small patient population for otologic procedures compared to other surgical fields. Regulatory pathways also require strict safety validations, particularly for semi-autonomous or fully autonomous functions. Nevertheless, FDA and European CE approvals for certain robotic systems illustrate their growing feasibility. Meanwhile, AR- and VR-based navigation is improving intraoperative visualization by overlaying critical structures such as the facial nerve onto the surgeon’s field, while AI-driven algorithms for instrument tracking and real-time monitoring offer further enhancements in safety and precision. In addition, simulation-based training in VR environments can accelerate surgical expertise and reduce learning curves.
Larger-scale clinical trials that directly compare robotic and conventional approaches are still needed to quantify benefits related to complication rates, operative times, and long-term auditory outcomes. Ongoing innovations in software integration and miniaturized hardware are likely to broaden the range of feasible robotic tasks within the ear’s narrow anatomical boundaries.
期刊介绍:
The international journal Auris Nasus Larynx provides the opportunity for rapid, carefully reviewed publications concerning the fundamental and clinical aspects of otorhinolaryngology and related fields. This includes otology, neurotology, bronchoesophagology, laryngology, rhinology, allergology, head and neck medicine and oncologic surgery, maxillofacial and plastic surgery, audiology, speech science.
Original papers, short communications and original case reports can be submitted. Reviews on recent developments are invited regularly and Letters to the Editor commenting on papers or any aspect of Auris Nasus Larynx are welcomed.
Founded in 1973 and previously published by the Society for Promotion of International Otorhinolaryngology, the journal is now the official English-language journal of the Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Society of Japan, Inc. The aim of its new international Editorial Board is to make Auris Nasus Larynx an international forum for high quality research and clinical sciences.