C. Duret , S. Chevalier , S. Martin , R. Kosi Tuavuwa , O. Chanay
{"title":"监测妇科超声的卫生习惯:一种新方法。","authors":"C. Duret , S. Chevalier , S. Martin , R. Kosi Tuavuwa , O. Chanay","doi":"10.1016/j.jhin.2025.07.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Ultrasound is essential in gynaecology and obstetrics, but inadequate hygiene practices can pose infection risks. Though infections directly linked to ultrasound are rare, poor disinfection facilitates microbial transmission. This study evaluates hygiene practices and contamination during ultrasound consultations to improve infection control using a new audit methodology.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To assess hygiene practices during gynaecology ultrasound consultations using a new audit approach; to evaluate microbial contamination post-consultation; and to correlate practices with contamination levels to optimize protocols.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Hygiene-related consumables used during consultations were recorded and compared to targets based on current guidelines. Microbiological samples were taken from probes and surfaces after consultations. A survey assessed healthcare professionals' knowledge and perceptions. Personalized training was conducted after initial audits, followed by a control audit.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Initial audits showed major gaps in hygiene, especially regarding hand hygiene and probe disinfection. Indicators of usage were <100%. After targeted training, they exceeded 120% of objectives. Initial contamination was high (median cfu: 15 on probes, 29 on surfaces), especially on abdominal probes. Post training, contamination significantly decreased (Kruskal–Wallis, <em>P</em> < 0.05). Detected flora included Gram-positive cocci and pathogens such as <em>Enterobacter hormaechei</em>, <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em>, and <em>Pseudomonas spp.</em></div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This innovative audit tool effectively assesses hygiene without observer bias and serves as a reliable indicator of good practice. Combined with the survey, it provides objective data. Targeted training improved compliance. Rigorous disinfection of all ultrasound components (including unused probes) between patients remains essential to minimize infection risks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54806,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hospital Infection","volume":"164 ","pages":"Pages 72-80"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Monitoring hygiene practices in gynaecological ultrasound: a new approach\",\"authors\":\"C. Duret , S. Chevalier , S. Martin , R. Kosi Tuavuwa , O. Chanay\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhin.2025.07.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Ultrasound is essential in gynaecology and obstetrics, but inadequate hygiene practices can pose infection risks. Though infections directly linked to ultrasound are rare, poor disinfection facilitates microbial transmission. This study evaluates hygiene practices and contamination during ultrasound consultations to improve infection control using a new audit methodology.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To assess hygiene practices during gynaecology ultrasound consultations using a new audit approach; to evaluate microbial contamination post-consultation; and to correlate practices with contamination levels to optimize protocols.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Hygiene-related consumables used during consultations were recorded and compared to targets based on current guidelines. Microbiological samples were taken from probes and surfaces after consultations. A survey assessed healthcare professionals' knowledge and perceptions. Personalized training was conducted after initial audits, followed by a control audit.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Initial audits showed major gaps in hygiene, especially regarding hand hygiene and probe disinfection. Indicators of usage were <100%. After targeted training, they exceeded 120% of objectives. Initial contamination was high (median cfu: 15 on probes, 29 on surfaces), especially on abdominal probes. Post training, contamination significantly decreased (Kruskal–Wallis, <em>P</em> < 0.05). Detected flora included Gram-positive cocci and pathogens such as <em>Enterobacter hormaechei</em>, <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em>, and <em>Pseudomonas spp.</em></div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This innovative audit tool effectively assesses hygiene without observer bias and serves as a reliable indicator of good practice. Combined with the survey, it provides objective data. Targeted training improved compliance. Rigorous disinfection of all ultrasound components (including unused probes) between patients remains essential to minimize infection risks.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54806,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hospital Infection\",\"volume\":\"164 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 72-80\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hospital Infection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195670125002105\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hospital Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195670125002105","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Monitoring hygiene practices in gynaecological ultrasound: a new approach
Background
Ultrasound is essential in gynaecology and obstetrics, but inadequate hygiene practices can pose infection risks. Though infections directly linked to ultrasound are rare, poor disinfection facilitates microbial transmission. This study evaluates hygiene practices and contamination during ultrasound consultations to improve infection control using a new audit methodology.
Aim
To assess hygiene practices during gynaecology ultrasound consultations using a new audit approach; to evaluate microbial contamination post-consultation; and to correlate practices with contamination levels to optimize protocols.
Methods
Hygiene-related consumables used during consultations were recorded and compared to targets based on current guidelines. Microbiological samples were taken from probes and surfaces after consultations. A survey assessed healthcare professionals' knowledge and perceptions. Personalized training was conducted after initial audits, followed by a control audit.
Findings
Initial audits showed major gaps in hygiene, especially regarding hand hygiene and probe disinfection. Indicators of usage were <100%. After targeted training, they exceeded 120% of objectives. Initial contamination was high (median cfu: 15 on probes, 29 on surfaces), especially on abdominal probes. Post training, contamination significantly decreased (Kruskal–Wallis, P < 0.05). Detected flora included Gram-positive cocci and pathogens such as Enterobacter hormaechei, Staphylococcus aureus, and Pseudomonas spp.
Conclusion
This innovative audit tool effectively assesses hygiene without observer bias and serves as a reliable indicator of good practice. Combined with the survey, it provides objective data. Targeted training improved compliance. Rigorous disinfection of all ultrasound components (including unused probes) between patients remains essential to minimize infection risks.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Hospital Infection is the editorially independent scientific publication of the Healthcare Infection Society. The aim of the Journal is to publish high quality research and information relating to infection prevention and control that is relevant to an international audience.
The Journal welcomes submissions that relate to all aspects of infection prevention and control in healthcare settings. This includes submissions that:
provide new insight into the epidemiology, surveillance, or prevention and control of healthcare-associated infections and antimicrobial resistance in healthcare settings;
provide new insight into cleaning, disinfection and decontamination;
provide new insight into the design of healthcare premises;
describe novel aspects of outbreaks of infection;
throw light on techniques for effective antimicrobial stewardship;
describe novel techniques (laboratory-based or point of care) for the detection of infection or antimicrobial resistance in the healthcare setting, particularly if these can be used to facilitate infection prevention and control;
improve understanding of the motivations of safe healthcare behaviour, or describe techniques for achieving behavioural and cultural change;
improve understanding of the use of IT systems in infection surveillance and prevention and control.