J.M. Alsweiler PhD , F. Amitrano PhD , J.E. Harding DPhil , C.A. Crowther MD , G.T.L. Brown PhD , A. Cavadino PhD , C.J.D. McKinlay PhD
{"title":"新西兰妊娠期糖尿病与学龄认知和健康结局:一项匹配队列研究","authors":"J.M. Alsweiler PhD , F. Amitrano PhD , J.E. Harding DPhil , C.A. Crowther MD , G.T.L. Brown PhD , A. Cavadino PhD , C.J.D. McKinlay PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jpeds.2025.114756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To determine if children exposed <em>in utero</em> to gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) have poorer school-age neurocognitive and cardiometabolic function than matched children not exposed to GDM.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>In a matched, cohort study, we compared 186 children of women diagnosed with GDM from a trial cohort with 186 children born at the same hospital whose mothers did not have GDM, matched for child sex, maternal body mass index (BMI), ethnicity, socio-economic status, and gestational age. Both GDM-exposed and nonGDM-exposed children were assessed at 6-7 years’ corrected age for neurocognitive function (NIH Toolbox), numeracy (Checkout Game), body composition, and peripheral/central blood pressure. The primary outcome was the Composite Cognitive Standard Score. Analysis was by generalized linear models, adjusted for matching criteria; exposure effects were estimated as OR or mean difference (MD), with 95% confidence intervals.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Exposure groups were similar for birthweight z-score, corrected age at assessment, matching criteria, and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. There was no difference between groups in mean cognitive score (104[15] vs 104[15]; MD = 2[−2, 5]) or its components. GDM-exposed children were less likely to have motor impairment (6% vs 11%, aRD = −6[−11, −1] but more likely to have low numeracy (10% vs 4%, aRD = 6[2, 11]) and hypertension (14% vs 6%, aRD = 8[1, 14]), and had higher mean BMI z-scores (0.95[1.61] vs 0.51[1.50], MD = 0.39[0.13, 0.65]).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Children exposed to GDM are not at increased risk of poorer school-age cognitive function compared with controls matched for potential confounders. However, GDM exposure was associated with increased childhood BMI and hypertension, which may affect subsequent cardiometabolic health.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54774,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatrics","volume":"287 ","pages":"Article 114756"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and School-Age Cognitive and Health Outcomes in New Zealand: A Matched Cohort Study\",\"authors\":\"J.M. Alsweiler PhD , F. Amitrano PhD , J.E. Harding DPhil , C.A. Crowther MD , G.T.L. Brown PhD , A. Cavadino PhD , C.J.D. McKinlay PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpeds.2025.114756\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To determine if children exposed <em>in utero</em> to gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) have poorer school-age neurocognitive and cardiometabolic function than matched children not exposed to GDM.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>In a matched, cohort study, we compared 186 children of women diagnosed with GDM from a trial cohort with 186 children born at the same hospital whose mothers did not have GDM, matched for child sex, maternal body mass index (BMI), ethnicity, socio-economic status, and gestational age. Both GDM-exposed and nonGDM-exposed children were assessed at 6-7 years’ corrected age for neurocognitive function (NIH Toolbox), numeracy (Checkout Game), body composition, and peripheral/central blood pressure. The primary outcome was the Composite Cognitive Standard Score. Analysis was by generalized linear models, adjusted for matching criteria; exposure effects were estimated as OR or mean difference (MD), with 95% confidence intervals.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Exposure groups were similar for birthweight z-score, corrected age at assessment, matching criteria, and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. There was no difference between groups in mean cognitive score (104[15] vs 104[15]; MD = 2[−2, 5]) or its components. GDM-exposed children were less likely to have motor impairment (6% vs 11%, aRD = −6[−11, −1] but more likely to have low numeracy (10% vs 4%, aRD = 6[2, 11]) and hypertension (14% vs 6%, aRD = 8[1, 14]), and had higher mean BMI z-scores (0.95[1.61] vs 0.51[1.50], MD = 0.39[0.13, 0.65]).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Children exposed to GDM are not at increased risk of poorer school-age cognitive function compared with controls matched for potential confounders. However, GDM exposure was associated with increased childhood BMI and hypertension, which may affect subsequent cardiometabolic health.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54774,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pediatrics\",\"volume\":\"287 \",\"pages\":\"Article 114756\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022347625002975\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022347625002975","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and School-Age Cognitive and Health Outcomes in New Zealand: A Matched Cohort Study
Objective
To determine if children exposed in utero to gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) have poorer school-age neurocognitive and cardiometabolic function than matched children not exposed to GDM.
Study design
In a matched, cohort study, we compared 186 children of women diagnosed with GDM from a trial cohort with 186 children born at the same hospital whose mothers did not have GDM, matched for child sex, maternal body mass index (BMI), ethnicity, socio-economic status, and gestational age. Both GDM-exposed and nonGDM-exposed children were assessed at 6-7 years’ corrected age for neurocognitive function (NIH Toolbox), numeracy (Checkout Game), body composition, and peripheral/central blood pressure. The primary outcome was the Composite Cognitive Standard Score. Analysis was by generalized linear models, adjusted for matching criteria; exposure effects were estimated as OR or mean difference (MD), with 95% confidence intervals.
Results
Exposure groups were similar for birthweight z-score, corrected age at assessment, matching criteria, and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. There was no difference between groups in mean cognitive score (104[15] vs 104[15]; MD = 2[−2, 5]) or its components. GDM-exposed children were less likely to have motor impairment (6% vs 11%, aRD = −6[−11, −1] but more likely to have low numeracy (10% vs 4%, aRD = 6[2, 11]) and hypertension (14% vs 6%, aRD = 8[1, 14]), and had higher mean BMI z-scores (0.95[1.61] vs 0.51[1.50], MD = 0.39[0.13, 0.65]).
Conclusions
Children exposed to GDM are not at increased risk of poorer school-age cognitive function compared with controls matched for potential confounders. However, GDM exposure was associated with increased childhood BMI and hypertension, which may affect subsequent cardiometabolic health.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Pediatrics is an international peer-reviewed journal that advances pediatric research and serves as a practical guide for pediatricians who manage health and diagnose and treat disorders in infants, children, and adolescents. The Journal publishes original work based on standards of excellence and expert review. The Journal seeks to publish high quality original articles that are immediately applicable to practice (basic science, translational research, evidence-based medicine), brief clinical and laboratory case reports, medical progress, expert commentary, grand rounds, insightful editorials, “classic” physical examinations, and novel insights into clinical and academic pediatric medicine related to every aspect of child health. Published monthly since 1932, The Journal of Pediatrics continues to promote the latest developments in pediatric medicine, child health, policy, and advocacy.
Topics covered in The Journal of Pediatrics include, but are not limited to:
General Pediatrics
Pediatric Subspecialties
Adolescent Medicine
Allergy and Immunology
Cardiology
Critical Care Medicine
Developmental-Behavioral Medicine
Endocrinology
Gastroenterology
Hematology-Oncology
Infectious Diseases
Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine
Nephrology
Neurology
Emergency Medicine
Pulmonology
Rheumatology
Genetics
Ethics
Health Service Research
Pediatric Hospitalist Medicine.