提炼人工智能视角:评估人工智能课程对医学生对人工智能态度的影响。

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Li Zheng, Yu Xiao
{"title":"提炼人工智能视角:评估人工智能课程对医学生对人工智能态度的影响。","authors":"Li Zheng, Yu Xiao","doi":"10.1186/s12909-025-07669-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study explores the impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) curricula on medical students' perceptions of AI, a critical topic given AI's transformative potential in healthcare and its rapid integration into medical practice and education. Using data from a global cross-sectional survey involving 4,596 students across 48 countries, we employed Coarsened Exact Matching (CEM) to address selection bias and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to examine mediating effects. Regression models were also applied to estimate the relationships between AI curricular and students' knowledge about and attitudes towards AI. Results reveal that participation in AI curricula significantly enhances students' knowledge about AI (β = .140, p < .001), equipping them with essential skills for AI-driven healthcare systems. However, it concurrently diminishes their enthusiasm for integrating AI into medical education (β = -.108, p < .001), reflecting potential concerns about ethical and professional implications. No significant effects were observed on students' attitudes towards Artificial Intelligence application in medicine, the physician's role, or AI-related ethical and legal conflicts. Heterogeneity analysis shows stronger positive effects on knowledge for veterinary students and those from developing countries, where AI education addresses critical resource gaps. Conversely, the negative effect on enthusiasm for AI teaching is more pronounced among students from developed countries, where advanced AI applications are more prevalent. SEM results reveal that preparedness for work with AI partially mediates the relationship between AI curricula and students' knowledge (β = .062, p < .001) and attitudes (β = .023, p < .001), adding theoretical depth to the findings. These results underscore the importance of balanced AI education to enhance knowledge while addressing concerns about its integration in education. This research has significant practical and theoretical implications, emphasizing the need for tailored AI curricula that align with students' professional goals and regional educational contexts. The study offers pathways for optimizing AI literacy globally, bridging resource disparities, and preparing future healthcare professionals for AI-driven advancements.</p>","PeriodicalId":51234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Education","volume":"25 1","pages":"1115"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12291331/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Refining AI perspectives: assessing the impact of ai curricular on medical students' attitudes towards artificial intelligence.\",\"authors\":\"Li Zheng, Yu Xiao\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12909-025-07669-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study explores the impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) curricula on medical students' perceptions of AI, a critical topic given AI's transformative potential in healthcare and its rapid integration into medical practice and education. Using data from a global cross-sectional survey involving 4,596 students across 48 countries, we employed Coarsened Exact Matching (CEM) to address selection bias and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to examine mediating effects. Regression models were also applied to estimate the relationships between AI curricular and students' knowledge about and attitudes towards AI. Results reveal that participation in AI curricula significantly enhances students' knowledge about AI (β = .140, p < .001), equipping them with essential skills for AI-driven healthcare systems. However, it concurrently diminishes their enthusiasm for integrating AI into medical education (β = -.108, p < .001), reflecting potential concerns about ethical and professional implications. No significant effects were observed on students' attitudes towards Artificial Intelligence application in medicine, the physician's role, or AI-related ethical and legal conflicts. Heterogeneity analysis shows stronger positive effects on knowledge for veterinary students and those from developing countries, where AI education addresses critical resource gaps. Conversely, the negative effect on enthusiasm for AI teaching is more pronounced among students from developed countries, where advanced AI applications are more prevalent. SEM results reveal that preparedness for work with AI partially mediates the relationship between AI curricula and students' knowledge (β = .062, p < .001) and attitudes (β = .023, p < .001), adding theoretical depth to the findings. These results underscore the importance of balanced AI education to enhance knowledge while addressing concerns about its integration in education. This research has significant practical and theoretical implications, emphasizing the need for tailored AI curricula that align with students' professional goals and regional educational contexts. The study offers pathways for optimizing AI literacy globally, bridging resource disparities, and preparing future healthcare professionals for AI-driven advancements.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Medical Education\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"1115\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12291331/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Medical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07669-8\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07669-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了人工智能(AI)课程对医学生对人工智能的看法的影响,鉴于人工智能在医疗保健领域的变革潜力及其迅速融入医疗实践和教育,这是一个关键话题。利用来自48个国家的4,596名学生的全球横断面调查数据,我们采用粗化精确匹配(CEM)来解决选择偏差,并采用结构方程模型(SEM)来检验中介效应。回归模型还用于估计人工智能课程与学生对人工智能的知识和态度之间的关系。结果表明,参与人工智能课程显著提高了学生对人工智能的认识(β =)。140页
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Refining AI perspectives: assessing the impact of ai curricular on medical students' attitudes towards artificial intelligence.

This study explores the impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) curricula on medical students' perceptions of AI, a critical topic given AI's transformative potential in healthcare and its rapid integration into medical practice and education. Using data from a global cross-sectional survey involving 4,596 students across 48 countries, we employed Coarsened Exact Matching (CEM) to address selection bias and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to examine mediating effects. Regression models were also applied to estimate the relationships between AI curricular and students' knowledge about and attitudes towards AI. Results reveal that participation in AI curricula significantly enhances students' knowledge about AI (β = .140, p < .001), equipping them with essential skills for AI-driven healthcare systems. However, it concurrently diminishes their enthusiasm for integrating AI into medical education (β = -.108, p < .001), reflecting potential concerns about ethical and professional implications. No significant effects were observed on students' attitudes towards Artificial Intelligence application in medicine, the physician's role, or AI-related ethical and legal conflicts. Heterogeneity analysis shows stronger positive effects on knowledge for veterinary students and those from developing countries, where AI education addresses critical resource gaps. Conversely, the negative effect on enthusiasm for AI teaching is more pronounced among students from developed countries, where advanced AI applications are more prevalent. SEM results reveal that preparedness for work with AI partially mediates the relationship between AI curricula and students' knowledge (β = .062, p < .001) and attitudes (β = .023, p < .001), adding theoretical depth to the findings. These results underscore the importance of balanced AI education to enhance knowledge while addressing concerns about its integration in education. This research has significant practical and theoretical implications, emphasizing the need for tailored AI curricula that align with students' professional goals and regional educational contexts. The study offers pathways for optimizing AI literacy globally, bridging resource disparities, and preparing future healthcare professionals for AI-driven advancements.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medical Education
BMC Medical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
795
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Education is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the training of healthcare professionals, including undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing education. The journal has a special focus on curriculum development, evaluations of performance, assessment of training needs and evidence-based medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信