桥梁早期医学教育和卫生系统的改善:一个多方面的教师发展计划,以提高参与和影响。

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Catherine Y Lau, Edgar Pierluissi, Kristin Casey Callaghan, Anna Chang, Lei Choi
{"title":"桥梁早期医学教育和卫生系统的改善:一个多方面的教师发展计划,以提高参与和影响。","authors":"Catherine Y Lau, Edgar Pierluissi, Kristin Casey Callaghan, Anna Chang, Lei Choi","doi":"10.1186/s12909-025-07579-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite calls to further incorporate health systems science in undergraduate medical education, the ability for early medical learners to participate in authentic, project-based learning in health systems science and improvement has been limited by the knowledge, skills, and competency of teaching faculty. This study explores the impact and outcomes of a comprehensive, longitudinal faculty development program for physician educators in health systems improvement (HSI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The University of California, San Francisco HSI faculty development program began with a medical school curricular redesign to include a 14-month weekly course that integrates HSI experiential learning with clinical skills training for early medical students in small groups led by physician coaches. Most physician educators began the role with no formal training in HSI - a gap this program addresses through a multi-faceted approach with standardized and individualized components. We studied the efficacy of the HSI faculty development program and report outcomes using the Kirkpatrick Model, focusing on impact on physicians, students, and health systems.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 2016 to 2023, the HSI faculty development program reached 119 faculty across 15 departments and three health systems. For Kirkpatrick level one (satisfaction), faculty participated in at least three workshops per year, with an average rating of 4.7 (scale 1-5). Faculty satisfaction in the teaching role is 4.5 and student rating of faculty is 4.8. Each year, faculty demonstrated Kirkpatrick level two (knowledge) by designing up to 60 HSI projects for the class of incoming first year medical students (n = 165). Faculty assessed other students' projects with high concordance with curricular leader grading (> 90%). All students met expectations by course conclusion. For level three (behavior), faculty independently led 35 three-hour small group sessions yearly for a total of 1,281 early medical students over 8 years, and all student project teams completed at least one full Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle. For level four (impact), faculty and students have completed 242 HSI projects to date, each aligned with health system priority areas.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study demonstrates that a longitudinal, multi-component HSI faculty development program provides physician faculty sufficient competence to effectively engage medical student-led teams in systems improvement in the clinical learning environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":51234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Education","volume":"25 1","pages":"1112"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12291519/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bridging early medical education and health systems improvement: a multi-faceted faculty development program to enhance engagement and impact.\",\"authors\":\"Catherine Y Lau, Edgar Pierluissi, Kristin Casey Callaghan, Anna Chang, Lei Choi\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12909-025-07579-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite calls to further incorporate health systems science in undergraduate medical education, the ability for early medical learners to participate in authentic, project-based learning in health systems science and improvement has been limited by the knowledge, skills, and competency of teaching faculty. This study explores the impact and outcomes of a comprehensive, longitudinal faculty development program for physician educators in health systems improvement (HSI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The University of California, San Francisco HSI faculty development program began with a medical school curricular redesign to include a 14-month weekly course that integrates HSI experiential learning with clinical skills training for early medical students in small groups led by physician coaches. Most physician educators began the role with no formal training in HSI - a gap this program addresses through a multi-faceted approach with standardized and individualized components. We studied the efficacy of the HSI faculty development program and report outcomes using the Kirkpatrick Model, focusing on impact on physicians, students, and health systems.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 2016 to 2023, the HSI faculty development program reached 119 faculty across 15 departments and three health systems. For Kirkpatrick level one (satisfaction), faculty participated in at least three workshops per year, with an average rating of 4.7 (scale 1-5). Faculty satisfaction in the teaching role is 4.5 and student rating of faculty is 4.8. Each year, faculty demonstrated Kirkpatrick level two (knowledge) by designing up to 60 HSI projects for the class of incoming first year medical students (n = 165). Faculty assessed other students' projects with high concordance with curricular leader grading (> 90%). All students met expectations by course conclusion. For level three (behavior), faculty independently led 35 three-hour small group sessions yearly for a total of 1,281 early medical students over 8 years, and all student project teams completed at least one full Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle. For level four (impact), faculty and students have completed 242 HSI projects to date, each aligned with health system priority areas.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study demonstrates that a longitudinal, multi-component HSI faculty development program provides physician faculty sufficient competence to effectively engage medical student-led teams in systems improvement in the clinical learning environment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Medical Education\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"1112\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12291519/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Medical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07579-9\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07579-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管呼吁进一步将卫生系统科学纳入本科医学教育,但早期医学学习者参与真实的、基于项目的卫生系统科学学习和改进的能力受到教师知识、技能和能力的限制。本研究探讨了在卫生系统改进(HSI)的医师教育工作者的全面,纵向教师发展计划的影响和结果。方法:加州大学旧金山分校HSI教师发展计划开始于医学院课程重新设计,包括14个月的每周课程,将HSI体验式学习与临床技能培训结合起来,由医生教练领导的早期医学学生小组。大多数医师教育工作者在开始这个角色时没有接受过正规的HSI培训——这个项目通过标准化和个性化的多方面方法来解决这一差距。我们研究了HSI教师发展计划的有效性,并使用Kirkpatrick模型报告了结果,重点关注对医生、学生和卫生系统的影响。结果:从2016年到2023年,HSI教师发展计划覆盖了15个系和3个卫生系统的119名教师。对于Kirkpatrick一级(满意度),教师每年至少参加三次研讨会,平均评分为4.7(量表1-5)。教师对教学角色的满意度为4.5分,学生对教师的满意度为4.8分。每年,教师通过为即将入学的一年级医学院学生(n = 165)设计多达60个HSI项目来展示柯克帕特里克二级(知识)。教师对其他学生项目的评估与课程领导评分的一致性很高(bb0 - 90%)。所有学生在课程结束时都达到了预期。对于第三级(行为),在8年的时间里,教师每年独立领导35个3小时的小组会议,共有1,281名早期医学学生,所有学生项目团队至少完成了一个完整的计划-执行-研究-行动周期。对于第四级(影响),教师和学生迄今为止已经完成了242个HSI项目,每个项目都与卫生系统的优先领域保持一致。结论:我们的研究表明,纵向的、多成分的HSI教师发展计划为医生教师提供了足够的能力,有效地参与医学生领导的团队在临床学习环境中的系统改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bridging early medical education and health systems improvement: a multi-faceted faculty development program to enhance engagement and impact.

Background: Despite calls to further incorporate health systems science in undergraduate medical education, the ability for early medical learners to participate in authentic, project-based learning in health systems science and improvement has been limited by the knowledge, skills, and competency of teaching faculty. This study explores the impact and outcomes of a comprehensive, longitudinal faculty development program for physician educators in health systems improvement (HSI).

Methods: The University of California, San Francisco HSI faculty development program began with a medical school curricular redesign to include a 14-month weekly course that integrates HSI experiential learning with clinical skills training for early medical students in small groups led by physician coaches. Most physician educators began the role with no formal training in HSI - a gap this program addresses through a multi-faceted approach with standardized and individualized components. We studied the efficacy of the HSI faculty development program and report outcomes using the Kirkpatrick Model, focusing on impact on physicians, students, and health systems.

Results: From 2016 to 2023, the HSI faculty development program reached 119 faculty across 15 departments and three health systems. For Kirkpatrick level one (satisfaction), faculty participated in at least three workshops per year, with an average rating of 4.7 (scale 1-5). Faculty satisfaction in the teaching role is 4.5 and student rating of faculty is 4.8. Each year, faculty demonstrated Kirkpatrick level two (knowledge) by designing up to 60 HSI projects for the class of incoming first year medical students (n = 165). Faculty assessed other students' projects with high concordance with curricular leader grading (> 90%). All students met expectations by course conclusion. For level three (behavior), faculty independently led 35 three-hour small group sessions yearly for a total of 1,281 early medical students over 8 years, and all student project teams completed at least one full Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle. For level four (impact), faculty and students have completed 242 HSI projects to date, each aligned with health system priority areas.

Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that a longitudinal, multi-component HSI faculty development program provides physician faculty sufficient competence to effectively engage medical student-led teams in systems improvement in the clinical learning environment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medical Education
BMC Medical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
795
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Education is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the training of healthcare professionals, including undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing education. The journal has a special focus on curriculum development, evaluations of performance, assessment of training needs and evidence-based medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信