Michael Noetel, Taren Sanders, Danielle Tracey, David R Lubans, Viviene A Temple, Andrew Bennie, James Conigrave, Mark Babic, Bridget Booker, Rebecca Pagano, James Boyer, Chris Lonsdale
{"title":"以学校为基础的体育活动干预对智力残疾儿童的影响:一项聚类随机试验。","authors":"Michael Noetel, Taren Sanders, Danielle Tracey, David R Lubans, Viviene A Temple, Andrew Bennie, James Conigrave, Mark Babic, Bridget Booker, Rebecca Pagano, James Boyer, Chris Lonsdale","doi":"10.1186/s12966-025-01798-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Children living with disability have poorer health outcomes than their typically developing peers. They are less physically active and at increased risk of chronic disease. Teacher-led, whole-of-school physical activity interventions are promising levers for population-level change, but are seldom tested among children with disability. We aimed to evaluate the effect of a blended teacher-professional learning program (online and in-person) on fundamental movement skills (FMS) and physical activity among children with intellectual disability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cluster randomized clinical trial, we randomized 20 government-funded primary schools, including 238 consenting students (Grades 2-5; aged 8-11 years at baseline). Ten schools received the blended teacher-professional learning intervention and 10 were assigned as waitlist controls. The professional learning was designed to support teachers as they implemented a whole-of-school intervention designed to enhance FMS and increase physical activity levels. The school-based intervention was mostly online learning, followed by lesson observations and site visits from project staff. Blinded assessors measured FMS competency using the Test of Gross Motor Development-3. Secondary outcomes were self-concept, enjoyment, wellbeing, 300-yard run time, and accelerometer-measured physical activity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found no significant group-by-time effects for the primary outcome (FMS competency: b = 1.07 [95% CI -3.70, 5.84], p =.658) or any secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A school-based intervention did not improve FMS competency or physical activity in children with intellectual disability. Results may be attenuated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Alternatively, low intensity teacher-professional learning interventions may not be enough to improve FMS or physical activity among children with intellectual disability.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry registration number: ACTRN12620000405910, registered: 25/03/2020.</p>","PeriodicalId":50336,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity","volume":"22 1","pages":"103"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12291417/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of a school-based physical activity intervention on children with intellectual disability: a cluster randomized trial.\",\"authors\":\"Michael Noetel, Taren Sanders, Danielle Tracey, David R Lubans, Viviene A Temple, Andrew Bennie, James Conigrave, Mark Babic, Bridget Booker, Rebecca Pagano, James Boyer, Chris Lonsdale\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12966-025-01798-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Children living with disability have poorer health outcomes than their typically developing peers. They are less physically active and at increased risk of chronic disease. Teacher-led, whole-of-school physical activity interventions are promising levers for population-level change, but are seldom tested among children with disability. We aimed to evaluate the effect of a blended teacher-professional learning program (online and in-person) on fundamental movement skills (FMS) and physical activity among children with intellectual disability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cluster randomized clinical trial, we randomized 20 government-funded primary schools, including 238 consenting students (Grades 2-5; aged 8-11 years at baseline). Ten schools received the blended teacher-professional learning intervention and 10 were assigned as waitlist controls. The professional learning was designed to support teachers as they implemented a whole-of-school intervention designed to enhance FMS and increase physical activity levels. The school-based intervention was mostly online learning, followed by lesson observations and site visits from project staff. Blinded assessors measured FMS competency using the Test of Gross Motor Development-3. Secondary outcomes were self-concept, enjoyment, wellbeing, 300-yard run time, and accelerometer-measured physical activity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found no significant group-by-time effects for the primary outcome (FMS competency: b = 1.07 [95% CI -3.70, 5.84], p =.658) or any secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A school-based intervention did not improve FMS competency or physical activity in children with intellectual disability. Results may be attenuated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Alternatively, low intensity teacher-professional learning interventions may not be enough to improve FMS or physical activity among children with intellectual disability.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry registration number: ACTRN12620000405910, registered: 25/03/2020.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50336,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"103\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12291417/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-025-01798-5\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-025-01798-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:残疾儿童的健康状况比正常发育的同龄人差。他们身体活动较少,患慢性疾病的风险增加。教师主导的全校体育活动干预是促进人口水平变化的有希望的手段,但很少在残疾儿童中进行试验。我们的目的是评估混合教师-专业学习计划(在线和面对面)对智力残疾儿童基本运动技能(FMS)和身体活动的影响。方法:采用整群随机临床试验,随机选取20所政府资助小学,238名自愿就读的学生(2-5年级;年龄8-11岁(基线)。10所学校接受了教师-专业混合学习干预,10所学校被分配为候补名单对照。专业学习旨在支持教师实施旨在提高FMS和增加体育活动水平的全校干预。以学校为基础的干预主要是在线学习,其次是课程观察和项目工作人员的实地考察。盲法评估者使用大肌肉运动发展测试-3来测量FMS能力。次要结果是自我概念、享受、幸福感、300码跑步时间和加速度计测量的身体活动。结果:我们发现主要结局(FMS胜任力:b = 1.07 [95% CI -3.70, 5.84], p =.658)或任何次要结局没有显著的分组时间效应。结论:以学校为基础的干预并没有改善智力残疾儿童的FMS能力或身体活动。结果可能因COVID-19大流行而减弱。另外,低强度的教师专业学习干预可能不足以改善智力残疾儿童的FMS或身体活动。试验注册:澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册编号:ACTRN12620000405910,注册日期:25/03/2020。
Effects of a school-based physical activity intervention on children with intellectual disability: a cluster randomized trial.
Background: Children living with disability have poorer health outcomes than their typically developing peers. They are less physically active and at increased risk of chronic disease. Teacher-led, whole-of-school physical activity interventions are promising levers for population-level change, but are seldom tested among children with disability. We aimed to evaluate the effect of a blended teacher-professional learning program (online and in-person) on fundamental movement skills (FMS) and physical activity among children with intellectual disability.
Methods: In this cluster randomized clinical trial, we randomized 20 government-funded primary schools, including 238 consenting students (Grades 2-5; aged 8-11 years at baseline). Ten schools received the blended teacher-professional learning intervention and 10 were assigned as waitlist controls. The professional learning was designed to support teachers as they implemented a whole-of-school intervention designed to enhance FMS and increase physical activity levels. The school-based intervention was mostly online learning, followed by lesson observations and site visits from project staff. Blinded assessors measured FMS competency using the Test of Gross Motor Development-3. Secondary outcomes were self-concept, enjoyment, wellbeing, 300-yard run time, and accelerometer-measured physical activity.
Results: We found no significant group-by-time effects for the primary outcome (FMS competency: b = 1.07 [95% CI -3.70, 5.84], p =.658) or any secondary outcomes.
Conclusions: A school-based intervention did not improve FMS competency or physical activity in children with intellectual disability. Results may be attenuated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Alternatively, low intensity teacher-professional learning interventions may not be enough to improve FMS or physical activity among children with intellectual disability.
Trial registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry registration number: ACTRN12620000405910, registered: 25/03/2020.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity (IJBNPA) is an open access, peer-reviewed journal offering high quality articles, rapid publication and wide diffusion in the public domain.
IJBNPA is devoted to furthering the understanding of the behavioral aspects of diet and physical activity and is unique in its inclusion of multiple levels of analysis, including populations, groups and individuals and its inclusion of epidemiology, and behavioral, theoretical and measurement research areas.