{"title":"3d打印临时修复体的透明度、颜色和硬度。","authors":"Hayriye Yasemin Yay Kuscu, Zuhal Gorus","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-13020-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This in vitro study investigates effects of different thicknesses (1 mm, 2 mm, 3 mm) and post-curing durations (20 and 25 min) on the translucency parameters (TP), color differences, and microhardness (HV) of NextDent 3D-printed provisional restorations. Fifty-four disk specimens (10 mm diameter) in three thicknesses (1 mm, 2 mm, 3 mm) were post-cured for 20-25 min, forming six groups (n = 9 per group). Color measurements were taken against white and black backgrounds to calculate TP and color differences. Microhardness was measured using a Vickers hardness tester (100 g load, 10 s). Data were analyzed with two-way ANOVA and pairwise comparisons were performed with LSD post-hoc tests (significance level: 0.05). Thickness significantly influenced TP, with 1 mm specimens showing the highest values (P < .05). Post-curing duration did not significantly affect TP or HV (P > .05). Vickers hardness was higher in 1 mm specimens than thicker samples (P < .05). No significant interaction was found between thickness and post-curing time. Thickness affects translucency and hardness in 3D-printed restorations, while post-curing times of 20 and 25 min had minimal impact. Clinicians should consider thickness based on esthetic and functional needs. Future studies should explore broader post-curing times and additional material properties.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"27227"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12297516/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Translucency, color, and hardness of 3D-printed provisional restorations.\",\"authors\":\"Hayriye Yasemin Yay Kuscu, Zuhal Gorus\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-13020-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This in vitro study investigates effects of different thicknesses (1 mm, 2 mm, 3 mm) and post-curing durations (20 and 25 min) on the translucency parameters (TP), color differences, and microhardness (HV) of NextDent 3D-printed provisional restorations. Fifty-four disk specimens (10 mm diameter) in three thicknesses (1 mm, 2 mm, 3 mm) were post-cured for 20-25 min, forming six groups (n = 9 per group). Color measurements were taken against white and black backgrounds to calculate TP and color differences. Microhardness was measured using a Vickers hardness tester (100 g load, 10 s). Data were analyzed with two-way ANOVA and pairwise comparisons were performed with LSD post-hoc tests (significance level: 0.05). Thickness significantly influenced TP, with 1 mm specimens showing the highest values (P < .05). Post-curing duration did not significantly affect TP or HV (P > .05). Vickers hardness was higher in 1 mm specimens than thicker samples (P < .05). No significant interaction was found between thickness and post-curing time. Thickness affects translucency and hardness in 3D-printed restorations, while post-curing times of 20 and 25 min had minimal impact. Clinicians should consider thickness based on esthetic and functional needs. Future studies should explore broader post-curing times and additional material properties.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"27227\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12297516/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-13020-4\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-13020-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Translucency, color, and hardness of 3D-printed provisional restorations.
This in vitro study investigates effects of different thicknesses (1 mm, 2 mm, 3 mm) and post-curing durations (20 and 25 min) on the translucency parameters (TP), color differences, and microhardness (HV) of NextDent 3D-printed provisional restorations. Fifty-four disk specimens (10 mm diameter) in three thicknesses (1 mm, 2 mm, 3 mm) were post-cured for 20-25 min, forming six groups (n = 9 per group). Color measurements were taken against white and black backgrounds to calculate TP and color differences. Microhardness was measured using a Vickers hardness tester (100 g load, 10 s). Data were analyzed with two-way ANOVA and pairwise comparisons were performed with LSD post-hoc tests (significance level: 0.05). Thickness significantly influenced TP, with 1 mm specimens showing the highest values (P < .05). Post-curing duration did not significantly affect TP or HV (P > .05). Vickers hardness was higher in 1 mm specimens than thicker samples (P < .05). No significant interaction was found between thickness and post-curing time. Thickness affects translucency and hardness in 3D-printed restorations, while post-curing times of 20 and 25 min had minimal impact. Clinicians should consider thickness based on esthetic and functional needs. Future studies should explore broader post-curing times and additional material properties.
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.