通过外科重症监护病房入院的非危重老年人早期活动预防肌肉损失。

IF 3.9 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Onuma Chaiwat, Thanadol Wachiramatee, Benjaporn Sathitkarnmanee, Suchera Rattanamung, Piyapat Dajpratham, Napat Thikom, Chayanan Thanakiattiwibun
{"title":"通过外科重症监护病房入院的非危重老年人早期活动预防肌肉损失。","authors":"Onuma Chaiwat, Thanadol Wachiramatee, Benjaporn Sathitkarnmanee, Suchera Rattanamung, Piyapat Dajpratham, Napat Thikom, Chayanan Thanakiattiwibun","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-12699-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Intensive care unit-acquired weakness impairs recovery among older adults. We evaluated whether an early mobilization protocol reduces loss of muscle strength and mass compared with usual care in postoperative surgical intensive care unit (SICU) patients. In a before-and-after cohort at Siriraj Hospital, Thailand, 90 patients aged ≥ 65 years received usual care (June 2018-October 2019) and 90 subsequent patients followed a protocol-driven early-mobilization program (October 2019-November 2021). Daily assessments included muscle strength, Medical Research Council sum score (MRC-SS) and handgrip dynamometry, muscle mass (bioelectrical impedance vector analysis), and SICU optimal mobilization score (SOMS). Functional status 1 week post-discharge was measured by telephone using the Barthel Index for activities of daily living (ADL). Groups were comparable in age, sex, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II, and sequential organ failure assessment scores. The median change in the MRC-SS was + 1 point in both groups (P = 0.149), and the median muscle-mass change was + 0.2 kg versus + 0.5 kg (P = 0.713). The intervention arm achieved a higher median SOMS (2.0 vs. 1.0; P < 0.001) and fewer nosocomial infections (11.1% vs. 35.6%; P < 0.001). Barthel ADL scores improved in proportion to rehabilitation intensity, and no serious mobilization-related adverse events occurred. Early mobilization did not significantly alter muscle strength or mass but safely increased mobilization intensity, reduced infections, and improved short-term functional outcomes in older SICU patients.Trial registration: Thai Clinical Trials Registry. Trial no. TCTR20210203006. Retrospectively registered on January 31, 2021.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"27198"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preventing muscle loss through early mobilization in non-critically ill older adults admitted to surgical intensive care units.\",\"authors\":\"Onuma Chaiwat, Thanadol Wachiramatee, Benjaporn Sathitkarnmanee, Suchera Rattanamung, Piyapat Dajpratham, Napat Thikom, Chayanan Thanakiattiwibun\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-12699-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Intensive care unit-acquired weakness impairs recovery among older adults. We evaluated whether an early mobilization protocol reduces loss of muscle strength and mass compared with usual care in postoperative surgical intensive care unit (SICU) patients. In a before-and-after cohort at Siriraj Hospital, Thailand, 90 patients aged ≥ 65 years received usual care (June 2018-October 2019) and 90 subsequent patients followed a protocol-driven early-mobilization program (October 2019-November 2021). Daily assessments included muscle strength, Medical Research Council sum score (MRC-SS) and handgrip dynamometry, muscle mass (bioelectrical impedance vector analysis), and SICU optimal mobilization score (SOMS). Functional status 1 week post-discharge was measured by telephone using the Barthel Index for activities of daily living (ADL). Groups were comparable in age, sex, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II, and sequential organ failure assessment scores. The median change in the MRC-SS was + 1 point in both groups (P = 0.149), and the median muscle-mass change was + 0.2 kg versus + 0.5 kg (P = 0.713). The intervention arm achieved a higher median SOMS (2.0 vs. 1.0; P < 0.001) and fewer nosocomial infections (11.1% vs. 35.6%; P < 0.001). Barthel ADL scores improved in proportion to rehabilitation intensity, and no serious mobilization-related adverse events occurred. Early mobilization did not significantly alter muscle strength or mass but safely increased mobilization intensity, reduced infections, and improved short-term functional outcomes in older SICU patients.Trial registration: Thai Clinical Trials Registry. Trial no. TCTR20210203006. Retrospectively registered on January 31, 2021.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"27198\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-12699-9\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-12699-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重症监护病房获得性虚弱损害老年人的康复。我们评估了与常规护理相比,早期活动方案是否能减少术后外科重症监护病房(SICU)患者的肌肉力量和质量损失。在泰国Siriraj医院的一项前后队列研究中,90名年龄≥65岁的患者接受了常规护理(2018年6月至2019年10月),随后的90名患者接受了由协议驱动的早期动员计划(2019年10月至2021年11月)。日常评估包括肌力、医学研究委员会总评分(MRC-SS)和握力测量、肌肉质量(生物电阻抗矢量分析)和SICU最佳活动评分(SOMS)。出院后1周的功能状态通过电话测量,采用Barthel日常生活活动指数(ADL)。各组在年龄、性别、急性生理和慢性健康评估II以及序贯器官衰竭评估评分方面具有可比性。两组MRC-SS的中位变化均为+ 1点(P = 0.149),肌肉质量的中位变化分别为+ 0.2 kg和+ 0.5 kg (P = 0.713)。干预组获得了更高的中位SOMS (2.0 vs 1.0;P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Preventing muscle loss through early mobilization in non-critically ill older adults admitted to surgical intensive care units.

Intensive care unit-acquired weakness impairs recovery among older adults. We evaluated whether an early mobilization protocol reduces loss of muscle strength and mass compared with usual care in postoperative surgical intensive care unit (SICU) patients. In a before-and-after cohort at Siriraj Hospital, Thailand, 90 patients aged ≥ 65 years received usual care (June 2018-October 2019) and 90 subsequent patients followed a protocol-driven early-mobilization program (October 2019-November 2021). Daily assessments included muscle strength, Medical Research Council sum score (MRC-SS) and handgrip dynamometry, muscle mass (bioelectrical impedance vector analysis), and SICU optimal mobilization score (SOMS). Functional status 1 week post-discharge was measured by telephone using the Barthel Index for activities of daily living (ADL). Groups were comparable in age, sex, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II, and sequential organ failure assessment scores. The median change in the MRC-SS was + 1 point in both groups (P = 0.149), and the median muscle-mass change was + 0.2 kg versus + 0.5 kg (P = 0.713). The intervention arm achieved a higher median SOMS (2.0 vs. 1.0; P < 0.001) and fewer nosocomial infections (11.1% vs. 35.6%; P < 0.001). Barthel ADL scores improved in proportion to rehabilitation intensity, and no serious mobilization-related adverse events occurred. Early mobilization did not significantly alter muscle strength or mass but safely increased mobilization intensity, reduced infections, and improved short-term functional outcomes in older SICU patients.Trial registration: Thai Clinical Trials Registry. Trial no. TCTR20210203006. Retrospectively registered on January 31, 2021.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports Natural Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19567
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections. Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021). •Engineering Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live. •Physical sciences Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics. •Earth and environmental sciences Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems. •Biological sciences Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants. •Health sciences The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信