基于交叉点的应急组织中介及其对应急网络弹性的影响——以中国两次特大灾害为例

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Risk Analysis Pub Date : 2025-07-26 DOI:10.1111/risa.70088
Xiaodong Ji, Bo Fan
{"title":"基于交叉点的应急组织中介及其对应急网络弹性的影响——以中国两次特大灾害为例","authors":"Xiaodong Ji, Bo Fan","doi":"10.1111/risa.70088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study focuses on intersection-based emergent organizational brokers (IBEOBs), which refers to the intersection of planned and emergent organization interactions. This study attempts to identify the role and composition of IBEOBs and examine their effect on the resilience of emergency response networks. We identified the information and resource networks in two disaster environments. Specifically, using the broker role classification framework, we identified the broker roles and organization types of the IBEOBs within the networks. Then, we investigated the effects of various roles and types of IBEOBs on the resilience of information and resource networks from a network perspective. Findings reveal that social groups (SGs) and foundations (Fs) comprise IBEOBs in the information network, but in addition to them, there are also social service institutions (SSIs) and private enterprises (PEs) in the resource networks. IBEOBs mainly play three broker roles: gatekeeper, representative, and liaison. The study's results on the effect of IBEOBs with different roles on resilience show that liaisons have a more significant influence on the resilience of information and resource networks than gatekeepers and representatives. Regarding the effect of different types of IBEOBs on resilience, SGs have a more significant negative influence on information and resource network resilience than Fs. Furthermore, SSIs and PEs have a redundant effect on resource network resilience. This study provides theoretical support to managers strategically use broker strategies to design resilient networks to cope with emergency operation risks.</p>","PeriodicalId":21472,"journal":{"name":"Risk Analysis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intersection-Based Emergent Organizational Brokers and Their Effect on the Resilience of Emergency Response Networks: A Case Study of Two Disasters in China.\",\"authors\":\"Xiaodong Ji, Bo Fan\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/risa.70088\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study focuses on intersection-based emergent organizational brokers (IBEOBs), which refers to the intersection of planned and emergent organization interactions. This study attempts to identify the role and composition of IBEOBs and examine their effect on the resilience of emergency response networks. We identified the information and resource networks in two disaster environments. Specifically, using the broker role classification framework, we identified the broker roles and organization types of the IBEOBs within the networks. Then, we investigated the effects of various roles and types of IBEOBs on the resilience of information and resource networks from a network perspective. Findings reveal that social groups (SGs) and foundations (Fs) comprise IBEOBs in the information network, but in addition to them, there are also social service institutions (SSIs) and private enterprises (PEs) in the resource networks. IBEOBs mainly play three broker roles: gatekeeper, representative, and liaison. The study's results on the effect of IBEOBs with different roles on resilience show that liaisons have a more significant influence on the resilience of information and resource networks than gatekeepers and representatives. Regarding the effect of different types of IBEOBs on resilience, SGs have a more significant negative influence on information and resource network resilience than Fs. Furthermore, SSIs and PEs have a redundant effect on resource network resilience. This study provides theoretical support to managers strategically use broker strategies to design resilient networks to cope with emergency operation risks.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21472,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Risk Analysis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Risk Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.70088\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.70088","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的重点是基于交叉点的紧急组织代理(IBEOBs),它是指计划和紧急组织交互的交叉点。本研究试图确定IBEOBs的作用和组成,并考察其对应急响应网络弹性的影响。我们确定了两种灾害环境中的信息和资源网络。具体地说,使用代理角色分类框架,我们确定了网络中IBEOBs的代理角色和组织类型。在此基础上,本文从网络视角考察了不同角色和类型的ibeob对信息资源网络弹性的影响。研究发现,信息网络中的ibeb主要由社会团体(SGs)和基金会(Fs)组成,资源网络中的ibeb主要由社会服务机构(ssi)和民营企业(PEs)组成。ibeob主要扮演三种代理角色:看门人、代表和联络人。研究结果显示,联络人对信息资源网络弹性的影响比守门人和代表更显著。在不同类型的ibeob对弹性的影响方面,SGs对信息和资源网络弹性的负向影响比Fs更显著。此外,ssi和pe对资源网络弹性具有冗余效应。本研究为管理者策略性地运用经纪人策略设计弹性网络以应对应急运营风险提供理论支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intersection-Based Emergent Organizational Brokers and Their Effect on the Resilience of Emergency Response Networks: A Case Study of Two Disasters in China.

This study focuses on intersection-based emergent organizational brokers (IBEOBs), which refers to the intersection of planned and emergent organization interactions. This study attempts to identify the role and composition of IBEOBs and examine their effect on the resilience of emergency response networks. We identified the information and resource networks in two disaster environments. Specifically, using the broker role classification framework, we identified the broker roles and organization types of the IBEOBs within the networks. Then, we investigated the effects of various roles and types of IBEOBs on the resilience of information and resource networks from a network perspective. Findings reveal that social groups (SGs) and foundations (Fs) comprise IBEOBs in the information network, but in addition to them, there are also social service institutions (SSIs) and private enterprises (PEs) in the resource networks. IBEOBs mainly play three broker roles: gatekeeper, representative, and liaison. The study's results on the effect of IBEOBs with different roles on resilience show that liaisons have a more significant influence on the resilience of information and resource networks than gatekeepers and representatives. Regarding the effect of different types of IBEOBs on resilience, SGs have a more significant negative influence on information and resource network resilience than Fs. Furthermore, SSIs and PEs have a redundant effect on resource network resilience. This study provides theoretical support to managers strategically use broker strategies to design resilient networks to cope with emergency operation risks.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Risk Analysis
Risk Analysis 数学-数学跨学科应用
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
10.50%
发文量
183
审稿时长
4.2 months
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the Society for Risk Analysis, Risk Analysis is ranked among the top 10 journals in the ISI Journal Citation Reports under the social sciences, mathematical methods category, and provides a focal point for new developments in the field of risk analysis. This international peer-reviewed journal is committed to publishing critical empirical research and commentaries dealing with risk issues. The topics covered include: • Human health and safety risks • Microbial risks • Engineering • Mathematical modeling • Risk characterization • Risk communication • Risk management and decision-making • Risk perception, acceptability, and ethics • Laws and regulatory policy • Ecological risks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信