躁动和精神病的简要操作化心理社会干预:在临床试验和临床护理中的应用。

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Clive Ballard, Kathryn Mills, Maria Soto, Jeffery Cummings, Jacobo Mintzer, George Grossberg, Manabu Ikeda, Sanjeev Pathak, Corinne Fischer, Joanne McDermid
{"title":"躁动和精神病的简要操作化心理社会干预:在临床试验和临床护理中的应用。","authors":"Clive Ballard, Kathryn Mills, Maria Soto, Jeffery Cummings, Jacobo Mintzer, George Grossberg, Manabu Ikeda, Sanjeev Pathak, Corinne Fischer, Joanne McDermid","doi":"10.1016/j.inpsyc.2025.100118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neuropsychiatric symptoms such as agitation and/or psychosis impact most individuals with dementia during their illness, leading to reduced quality of life, distress, more rapid clinical decline, and an increased risk of institutionalization. Widely used pharmacological approaches have modest benefits and are associated with significant adverse events.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A narrative review was conducted to examine the evidence for the benefits of non-pharmacological treatments for agitation and psychosis in people with dementia, with a focus on operationalized approaches that could readily be introduced into clinical practice. In the absence of substantial evidence pertaining to non-pharmacological treatments of psychosis, the review was supplemented with a secondary analysis of an existing WHELD/BPST dataset.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There is substantial evidence that simple non-pharmacological treatment approaches, such as personalized activities with social interaction, are effective in the treatment of agitation or enabling the reduction of psychotropic medication without worsening of agitation. Examples are presented of several operationalized approaches suitable for clinical implementation. In contrast, the treatment response of psychotic symptoms in people with dementia to non-pharmacological approaches is less clear cut. There is emerging evidence that although currently used non-pharmacological approaches do not directly improve psychosis in people with dementia, they do improve quality of life and concurrent neuropsychiatric symptoms such as apathy and agitation.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Although best practice guidelines universally recommend non-pharmacological interventions as the first-line treatment for neuropsychiatric symptoms, implementation has been limited. Several tools, such as Brief Psychosocial Therapy, are described which may help bridge this gap into clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":14368,"journal":{"name":"International psychogeriatrics","volume":" ","pages":"100118"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Brief operationalized psychosocial interventions for agitation and psychosis: Use in clinical trials and clinical care.\",\"authors\":\"Clive Ballard, Kathryn Mills, Maria Soto, Jeffery Cummings, Jacobo Mintzer, George Grossberg, Manabu Ikeda, Sanjeev Pathak, Corinne Fischer, Joanne McDermid\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.inpsyc.2025.100118\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neuropsychiatric symptoms such as agitation and/or psychosis impact most individuals with dementia during their illness, leading to reduced quality of life, distress, more rapid clinical decline, and an increased risk of institutionalization. Widely used pharmacological approaches have modest benefits and are associated with significant adverse events.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A narrative review was conducted to examine the evidence for the benefits of non-pharmacological treatments for agitation and psychosis in people with dementia, with a focus on operationalized approaches that could readily be introduced into clinical practice. In the absence of substantial evidence pertaining to non-pharmacological treatments of psychosis, the review was supplemented with a secondary analysis of an existing WHELD/BPST dataset.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There is substantial evidence that simple non-pharmacological treatment approaches, such as personalized activities with social interaction, are effective in the treatment of agitation or enabling the reduction of psychotropic medication without worsening of agitation. Examples are presented of several operationalized approaches suitable for clinical implementation. In contrast, the treatment response of psychotic symptoms in people with dementia to non-pharmacological approaches is less clear cut. There is emerging evidence that although currently used non-pharmacological approaches do not directly improve psychosis in people with dementia, they do improve quality of life and concurrent neuropsychiatric symptoms such as apathy and agitation.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Although best practice guidelines universally recommend non-pharmacological interventions as the first-line treatment for neuropsychiatric symptoms, implementation has been limited. Several tools, such as Brief Psychosocial Therapy, are described which may help bridge this gap into clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14368,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International psychogeriatrics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"100118\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International psychogeriatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inpsyc.2025.100118\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International psychogeriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inpsyc.2025.100118","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:神经精神症状,如躁动和/或精神病影响大多数痴呆症患者,导致生活质量下降,痛苦,临床衰退更快,住院风险增加。广泛使用的药理学方法有适度的益处,并与显著的不良事件相关。方法:对非药物治疗痴呆患者躁动和精神病的益处的证据进行了叙述性回顾,重点是可操作的方法,可以很容易地引入临床实践。由于缺乏有关精神病非药物治疗的实质性证据,本综述补充了对现有WHELD/BPST数据集的二次分析。结果:有大量证据表明,简单的非药物治疗方法,如个性化的社会互动活动,对躁动的治疗是有效的,或者可以减少精神药物的使用而不会使躁动恶化。举例介绍了几种适用于临床实施的可操作方法。相比之下,痴呆症患者的精神病症状对非药物治疗的反应不太明确。有新的证据表明,尽管目前使用的非药物方法不能直接改善痴呆症患者的精神病,但它们确实能改善生活质量,并改善并发的神经精神症状,如冷漠和躁动。讨论:尽管最佳实践指南普遍推荐非药物干预作为神经精神症状的一线治疗方法,但实施受到限制。一些工具,如简短的社会心理治疗,描述可能有助于弥合这一差距进入临床实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Brief operationalized psychosocial interventions for agitation and psychosis: Use in clinical trials and clinical care.

Background: Neuropsychiatric symptoms such as agitation and/or psychosis impact most individuals with dementia during their illness, leading to reduced quality of life, distress, more rapid clinical decline, and an increased risk of institutionalization. Widely used pharmacological approaches have modest benefits and are associated with significant adverse events.

Methods: A narrative review was conducted to examine the evidence for the benefits of non-pharmacological treatments for agitation and psychosis in people with dementia, with a focus on operationalized approaches that could readily be introduced into clinical practice. In the absence of substantial evidence pertaining to non-pharmacological treatments of psychosis, the review was supplemented with a secondary analysis of an existing WHELD/BPST dataset.

Results: There is substantial evidence that simple non-pharmacological treatment approaches, such as personalized activities with social interaction, are effective in the treatment of agitation or enabling the reduction of psychotropic medication without worsening of agitation. Examples are presented of several operationalized approaches suitable for clinical implementation. In contrast, the treatment response of psychotic symptoms in people with dementia to non-pharmacological approaches is less clear cut. There is emerging evidence that although currently used non-pharmacological approaches do not directly improve psychosis in people with dementia, they do improve quality of life and concurrent neuropsychiatric symptoms such as apathy and agitation.

Discussion: Although best practice guidelines universally recommend non-pharmacological interventions as the first-line treatment for neuropsychiatric symptoms, implementation has been limited. Several tools, such as Brief Psychosocial Therapy, are described which may help bridge this gap into clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International psychogeriatrics
International psychogeriatrics 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
8.60%
发文量
217
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: A highly respected, multidisciplinary journal, International Psychogeriatrics publishes high quality original research papers in the field of psychogeriatrics. The journal aims to be the leading peer reviewed journal dealing with all aspects of the mental health of older people throughout the world. Circulated to over 1,000 members of the International Psychogeriatric Association, International Psychogeriatrics also features important editorials, provocative debates, literature reviews, book reviews and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信