Nicola Veronese, Francesco Bolzetta, Livia Gallo, Giorgia Durante, Laura Vernuccio, Carlo Saccaro, Caterina Maria Gambino, Carlo Custodero, Piero Portincasa, Andrea Morotti, Alice Galli, Chiara Trasciatti, Alessandro Padovani, Andrea Pilotto, Mario Barbagallo
{"title":"应用人工智能方法的痴呆临床预测模型。","authors":"Nicola Veronese, Francesco Bolzetta, Livia Gallo, Giorgia Durante, Laura Vernuccio, Carlo Saccaro, Caterina Maria Gambino, Carlo Custodero, Piero Portincasa, Andrea Morotti, Alice Galli, Chiara Trasciatti, Alessandro Padovani, Andrea Pilotto, Mario Barbagallo","doi":"10.1007/s40520-025-03112-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>While nearly half of all dementia cases are potentially preventable, early detection and targeted interventions are critical. Artificial intelligence (AI)-enhanced clinical prediction models offer promising tools to improve diagnostic and prognostic accuracy by leveraging machine learning (ML) to integrate diverse data sources. This systematic review evaluates the development, performance, and clinical applicability of AI-based prediction models in dementia.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>Searches of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science identified peer-reviewed studies up to October 2024, focusing on AI-based models predicting dementia onset. Included studies were assessed for model accuracy, bias, and generalizability using the PROBAST tool. Data extraction adhered to the TRIPOD and CHARMS frameworks, capturing study design, participant demographics, predictor variables, and performance metrics.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Among 2699 articles initially screened, 21 studies were included, encompassing over 1 million participants. AI models, extremely heterogenous for their nature, demonstrated good predictive accuracy, with a mean area under the curve of 0.845. While internal validation was conducted in all studies, external validation was limited. Models incorporating ML methods like random forests and support vector machines outperformed traditional approaches. The most used parameters were clinical and cognitive data, whilst data about biomarkers were the less used. Risk of bias was generally low, though calibration and generalizability remained challenges.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>AI-based prediction models show strong potential for early dementia detection and personalized care. However, their integration into clinical practice requires addressing issues of external validation, data representativeness, and model interpretability. Further research should focus on robust validation and ethical implementation to optimize their utility in dementia care.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7720,"journal":{"name":"Aging Clinical and Experimental Research","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12296797/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical prediction models using artificial intelligence approaches in dementia\",\"authors\":\"Nicola Veronese, Francesco Bolzetta, Livia Gallo, Giorgia Durante, Laura Vernuccio, Carlo Saccaro, Caterina Maria Gambino, Carlo Custodero, Piero Portincasa, Andrea Morotti, Alice Galli, Chiara Trasciatti, Alessandro Padovani, Andrea Pilotto, Mario Barbagallo\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40520-025-03112-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>While nearly half of all dementia cases are potentially preventable, early detection and targeted interventions are critical. Artificial intelligence (AI)-enhanced clinical prediction models offer promising tools to improve diagnostic and prognostic accuracy by leveraging machine learning (ML) to integrate diverse data sources. This systematic review evaluates the development, performance, and clinical applicability of AI-based prediction models in dementia.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>Searches of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science identified peer-reviewed studies up to October 2024, focusing on AI-based models predicting dementia onset. Included studies were assessed for model accuracy, bias, and generalizability using the PROBAST tool. Data extraction adhered to the TRIPOD and CHARMS frameworks, capturing study design, participant demographics, predictor variables, and performance metrics.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Among 2699 articles initially screened, 21 studies were included, encompassing over 1 million participants. AI models, extremely heterogenous for their nature, demonstrated good predictive accuracy, with a mean area under the curve of 0.845. While internal validation was conducted in all studies, external validation was limited. Models incorporating ML methods like random forests and support vector machines outperformed traditional approaches. The most used parameters were clinical and cognitive data, whilst data about biomarkers were the less used. Risk of bias was generally low, though calibration and generalizability remained challenges.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>AI-based prediction models show strong potential for early dementia detection and personalized care. However, their integration into clinical practice requires addressing issues of external validation, data representativeness, and model interpretability. Further research should focus on robust validation and ethical implementation to optimize their utility in dementia care.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7720,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aging Clinical and Experimental Research\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12296797/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aging Clinical and Experimental Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40520-025-03112-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aging Clinical and Experimental Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40520-025-03112-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:虽然近一半的痴呆症病例是可以预防的,但早期发现和有针对性的干预至关重要。人工智能(AI)增强的临床预测模型通过利用机器学习(ML)整合各种数据源,为提高诊断和预后准确性提供了有前途的工具。本系统综述评估了基于人工智能的痴呆预测模型的发展、性能和临床适用性。方法:检索PubMed、Embase和Web of Science,确定了截至2024年10月的同行评议研究,重点关注基于人工智能的痴呆发病预测模型。使用PROBAST工具评估纳入的研究的模型准确性、偏倚和普遍性。数据提取遵循TRIPOD和CHARMS框架,捕获研究设计、参与者人口统计、预测变量和性能指标。结果:在最初筛选的2699篇文章中,纳入了21项研究,涉及超过100万名参与者。人工智能模型由于其本质上的异质性,表现出良好的预测精度,曲线下的平均面积为0.845。虽然所有研究都进行了内部验证,但外部验证有限。结合随机森林和支持向量机等ML方法的模型优于传统方法。使用最多的参数是临床和认知数据,而关于生物标志物的数据使用较少。偏倚的风险一般较低,但校准和推广仍然是一个挑战。结论:基于人工智能的预测模型在早期发现痴呆和个性化护理方面具有很强的潜力。然而,将它们整合到临床实践中需要解决外部验证、数据代表性和模型可解释性等问题。进一步的研究应侧重于稳健的验证和道德实施,以优化其在痴呆症护理中的效用。
Clinical prediction models using artificial intelligence approaches in dementia
Background
While nearly half of all dementia cases are potentially preventable, early detection and targeted interventions are critical. Artificial intelligence (AI)-enhanced clinical prediction models offer promising tools to improve diagnostic and prognostic accuracy by leveraging machine learning (ML) to integrate diverse data sources. This systematic review evaluates the development, performance, and clinical applicability of AI-based prediction models in dementia.
Methods
Searches of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science identified peer-reviewed studies up to October 2024, focusing on AI-based models predicting dementia onset. Included studies were assessed for model accuracy, bias, and generalizability using the PROBAST tool. Data extraction adhered to the TRIPOD and CHARMS frameworks, capturing study design, participant demographics, predictor variables, and performance metrics.
Results
Among 2699 articles initially screened, 21 studies were included, encompassing over 1 million participants. AI models, extremely heterogenous for their nature, demonstrated good predictive accuracy, with a mean area under the curve of 0.845. While internal validation was conducted in all studies, external validation was limited. Models incorporating ML methods like random forests and support vector machines outperformed traditional approaches. The most used parameters were clinical and cognitive data, whilst data about biomarkers were the less used. Risk of bias was generally low, though calibration and generalizability remained challenges.
Conclusions
AI-based prediction models show strong potential for early dementia detection and personalized care. However, their integration into clinical practice requires addressing issues of external validation, data representativeness, and model interpretability. Further research should focus on robust validation and ethical implementation to optimize their utility in dementia care.
期刊介绍:
Aging clinical and experimental research offers a multidisciplinary forum on the progressing field of gerontology and geriatrics. The areas covered by the journal include: biogerontology, neurosciences, epidemiology, clinical gerontology and geriatric assessment, social, economical and behavioral gerontology. “Aging clinical and experimental research” appears bimonthly and publishes review articles, original papers and case reports.