利用通量塔数据评价湿润森林蒸散发的博文比法

IF 2.1 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Ecohydrology Pub Date : 2025-07-29 DOI:10.1002/eco.70083
Wenjie Yan, Lanwu He, Jiawei Jiang, Xiaohong Chen, Yong Luo, Yujiu Xiong
{"title":"利用通量塔数据评价湿润森林蒸散发的博文比法","authors":"Wenjie Yan,&nbsp;Lanwu He,&nbsp;Jiawei Jiang,&nbsp;Xiaohong Chen,&nbsp;Yong Luo,&nbsp;Yujiu Xiong","doi":"10.1002/eco.70083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Evapotranspiration (ET) is a critical component of the hydrological cycle and surface energy budget, and its accurate measurement is essential for elucidating land-atmosphere interactions and the dynamics of water and energy exchange. The Bowen ratio energy balance (BREB) method is a widely utilized approach for observing ET, offering a more economical and less labour-intensive alternative to the eddy covariance (EC) technique, yet its accuracy in humid forested regions remains insufficiently studied. This study evaluates the performance of the BREB method in measuring ET in two subtropical humid forest sites in China (Dinghushan [DHS] and Qianyanzhou [QYZ]), using concurrent EC measurements at intraday and daily scales. The validity of the Bowen ratio (β) was analysed first, with over 90% of days meeting a data validity rate of &gt; 90%. Results show strong correlations between BREB- and EC-derived daily ET (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> &gt; 0.74), yet systematic BREB overestimation persists (MAE: 0.76–0.79 mm/day), particularly during summer high-radiation periods. XGBoost-SHAP analysis reveals that net radiation (Rn) dominates ET discrepancies (feature importance: 0.33–0.37). High Rn values cause the eddy diffusivity ratio (K<sub>h</sub>/K<sub>w</sub>) to exceed unity or become negative when β<sub>EC</sub> &gt; 0, thereby overestimating BREB measurements. Conversely, precipitation (P) usually induces β anomalies, resulting in underestimation of ET, especially in autumn–winter precipitation periods. During midday (11:00 AM–1:00 PM), the BREB method systematically overestimates 30-min mean ET by 0.05 mm (representing 33% overestimation) relative to flux tower measurements, whereas in evening periods (after 5:00 PM), it underestimates ET by ~0.025 mm (42% underestimation). These findings highlight the potential and limitations of the BREB method in humid forested regions, providing insights into its performance for measuring ET under varying climatic conditions.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55169,"journal":{"name":"Ecohydrology","volume":"18 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Bowen Ratio Method for Evapotranspiration in Humid Forests Using Flux Tower Data\",\"authors\":\"Wenjie Yan,&nbsp;Lanwu He,&nbsp;Jiawei Jiang,&nbsp;Xiaohong Chen,&nbsp;Yong Luo,&nbsp;Yujiu Xiong\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/eco.70083\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Evapotranspiration (ET) is a critical component of the hydrological cycle and surface energy budget, and its accurate measurement is essential for elucidating land-atmosphere interactions and the dynamics of water and energy exchange. The Bowen ratio energy balance (BREB) method is a widely utilized approach for observing ET, offering a more economical and less labour-intensive alternative to the eddy covariance (EC) technique, yet its accuracy in humid forested regions remains insufficiently studied. This study evaluates the performance of the BREB method in measuring ET in two subtropical humid forest sites in China (Dinghushan [DHS] and Qianyanzhou [QYZ]), using concurrent EC measurements at intraday and daily scales. The validity of the Bowen ratio (β) was analysed first, with over 90% of days meeting a data validity rate of &gt; 90%. Results show strong correlations between BREB- and EC-derived daily ET (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> &gt; 0.74), yet systematic BREB overestimation persists (MAE: 0.76–0.79 mm/day), particularly during summer high-radiation periods. XGBoost-SHAP analysis reveals that net radiation (Rn) dominates ET discrepancies (feature importance: 0.33–0.37). High Rn values cause the eddy diffusivity ratio (K<sub>h</sub>/K<sub>w</sub>) to exceed unity or become negative when β<sub>EC</sub> &gt; 0, thereby overestimating BREB measurements. Conversely, precipitation (P) usually induces β anomalies, resulting in underestimation of ET, especially in autumn–winter precipitation periods. During midday (11:00 AM–1:00 PM), the BREB method systematically overestimates 30-min mean ET by 0.05 mm (representing 33% overestimation) relative to flux tower measurements, whereas in evening periods (after 5:00 PM), it underestimates ET by ~0.025 mm (42% underestimation). These findings highlight the potential and limitations of the BREB method in humid forested regions, providing insights into its performance for measuring ET under varying climatic conditions.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55169,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecohydrology\",\"volume\":\"18 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecohydrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eco.70083\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecohydrology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eco.70083","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

蒸散发(ET)是水循环和地表能量收支的重要组成部分,其精确测量对于阐明陆地-大气相互作用和水能量交换动力学至关重要。鲍文比能量平衡(BREB)方法是一种广泛使用的观测ET的方法,它提供了一种比涡动相关(EC)技术更经济、更少劳动密集型的替代方法,但其在潮湿森林地区的准确性研究还不够。本研究在中国两个亚热带湿润森林样地(定湖山[DHS]和千烟州[QYZ])使用日内和日尺度的同步EC测量,评估了BREB方法测量ET的性能。首先分析鲍文比(β)的效度,超过90%的天数满足数据效度为90%。结果显示,BREB和ec衍生的日ET之间存在很强的相关性(R2 > 0.74),但系统性的BREB高估仍然存在(MAE: 0.76-0.79 mm/day),特别是在夏季高辐射期。XGBoost-SHAP分析显示净辐射(Rn)主导ET差异(特征重要性:0.33-0.37)。当βEC >; 0时,高Rn值导致涡流扩散率(Kh/Kw)超过1或变为负值,从而高估了BREB测量值。相反,降水(P)通常引起β异常,导致ET低估,特别是在秋冬降水期。在中午(11:00 AM-1:00 PM),相对于通量塔测量值,BREB方法系统地高估了30分钟平均ET 0.05 mm(代表高估33%),而在晚上时段(下午5点之后),它低估了ET ~0.025 mm(低估42%)。这些发现突出了BREB方法在潮湿森林地区的潜力和局限性,为其在不同气候条件下测量ET的性能提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of Bowen Ratio Method for Evapotranspiration in Humid Forests Using Flux Tower Data

Evapotranspiration (ET) is a critical component of the hydrological cycle and surface energy budget, and its accurate measurement is essential for elucidating land-atmosphere interactions and the dynamics of water and energy exchange. The Bowen ratio energy balance (BREB) method is a widely utilized approach for observing ET, offering a more economical and less labour-intensive alternative to the eddy covariance (EC) technique, yet its accuracy in humid forested regions remains insufficiently studied. This study evaluates the performance of the BREB method in measuring ET in two subtropical humid forest sites in China (Dinghushan [DHS] and Qianyanzhou [QYZ]), using concurrent EC measurements at intraday and daily scales. The validity of the Bowen ratio (β) was analysed first, with over 90% of days meeting a data validity rate of > 90%. Results show strong correlations between BREB- and EC-derived daily ET (R2 > 0.74), yet systematic BREB overestimation persists (MAE: 0.76–0.79 mm/day), particularly during summer high-radiation periods. XGBoost-SHAP analysis reveals that net radiation (Rn) dominates ET discrepancies (feature importance: 0.33–0.37). High Rn values cause the eddy diffusivity ratio (Kh/Kw) to exceed unity or become negative when βEC > 0, thereby overestimating BREB measurements. Conversely, precipitation (P) usually induces β anomalies, resulting in underestimation of ET, especially in autumn–winter precipitation periods. During midday (11:00 AM–1:00 PM), the BREB method systematically overestimates 30-min mean ET by 0.05 mm (representing 33% overestimation) relative to flux tower measurements, whereas in evening periods (after 5:00 PM), it underestimates ET by ~0.025 mm (42% underestimation). These findings highlight the potential and limitations of the BREB method in humid forested regions, providing insights into its performance for measuring ET under varying climatic conditions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecohydrology
Ecohydrology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
116
审稿时长
24 months
期刊介绍: Ecohydrology is an international journal publishing original scientific and review papers that aim to improve understanding of processes at the interface between ecology and hydrology and associated applications related to environmental management. Ecohydrology seeks to increase interdisciplinary insights by placing particular emphasis on interactions and associated feedbacks in both space and time between ecological systems and the hydrological cycle. Research contributions are solicited from disciplines focusing on the physical, ecological, biological, biogeochemical, geomorphological, drainage basin, mathematical and methodological aspects of ecohydrology. Research in both terrestrial and aquatic systems is of interest provided it explicitly links ecological systems and the hydrologic cycle; research such as aquatic ecological, channel engineering, or ecological or hydrological modelling is less appropriate for the journal unless it specifically addresses the criteria above. Manuscripts describing individual case studies are of interest in cases where broader insights are discussed beyond site- and species-specific results.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信