Xian Wang, Junfeng Liu, Huihuang Wu, Xiurong Hu, Yuqing Wang, Ying Liu, Jianmin Ma, Shu Tao
{"title":"中国货运业脱碳:CGE框架下碳税对贸易模式和生产配置的空间影响","authors":"Xian Wang, Junfeng Liu, Huihuang Wu, Xiurong Hu, Yuqing Wang, Ying Liu, Jianmin Ma, Shu Tao","doi":"10.1029/2025EF006300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Reducing emissions in the freight sector is a key focus in China's pursuit of sustainability. Previous studies have not adequately addressed the complex interplay between freight activity, commodity movements, and geographical distances in evaluating mitigation policies. Here, we developed a new distance-based computable general equilibrium (CGE) model to address the freight costs between regions, enabling a detailed analysis of the spatial trade patterns, production relocation, and environmental impacts of different carbon tax scenarios on the freight sector. We found that a substantial carbon tax collection (700 CNY/ton CO<sub>2</sub> by 2025) could reduce China's total freight turnover by 1.60% and cut industry-wide CO<sub>2</sub> emission by approximately 200 million tons (accounting for 1.8% of total CO<sub>2</sub> emissions in China). The response to freight carbon tax varies with distance: longer bilateral trade distances experience a sharper decline in freight volume, while shorter intra-provincial and neighboring interprovincial trade becomes more prosperous. Production activity tends to relocate to regions closer to customers and suppliers under the carbon tax, and each additional 1,000 km trade distance is associated with 0.3–1.2% reduction in provincial production. By integrating a spatial dimension into a CGE framework, our study elucidates how freight cost redistributes policy costs and benefits across regions, offering a more nuanced foundation for the design of targeted, regionally balanced carbon tax policies in China's freight decarbonization strategy.</p>","PeriodicalId":48748,"journal":{"name":"Earths Future","volume":"13 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2025EF006300","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decarbonizing China's Freight Sector: Spatial Impacts of Carbon Taxation on Trade Patterns and Production Allocation in a CGE Framework\",\"authors\":\"Xian Wang, Junfeng Liu, Huihuang Wu, Xiurong Hu, Yuqing Wang, Ying Liu, Jianmin Ma, Shu Tao\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2025EF006300\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Reducing emissions in the freight sector is a key focus in China's pursuit of sustainability. Previous studies have not adequately addressed the complex interplay between freight activity, commodity movements, and geographical distances in evaluating mitigation policies. Here, we developed a new distance-based computable general equilibrium (CGE) model to address the freight costs between regions, enabling a detailed analysis of the spatial trade patterns, production relocation, and environmental impacts of different carbon tax scenarios on the freight sector. We found that a substantial carbon tax collection (700 CNY/ton CO<sub>2</sub> by 2025) could reduce China's total freight turnover by 1.60% and cut industry-wide CO<sub>2</sub> emission by approximately 200 million tons (accounting for 1.8% of total CO<sub>2</sub> emissions in China). The response to freight carbon tax varies with distance: longer bilateral trade distances experience a sharper decline in freight volume, while shorter intra-provincial and neighboring interprovincial trade becomes more prosperous. Production activity tends to relocate to regions closer to customers and suppliers under the carbon tax, and each additional 1,000 km trade distance is associated with 0.3–1.2% reduction in provincial production. By integrating a spatial dimension into a CGE framework, our study elucidates how freight cost redistributes policy costs and benefits across regions, offering a more nuanced foundation for the design of targeted, regionally balanced carbon tax policies in China's freight decarbonization strategy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48748,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Earths Future\",\"volume\":\"13 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2025EF006300\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Earths Future\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2025EF006300\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earths Future","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2025EF006300","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Decarbonizing China's Freight Sector: Spatial Impacts of Carbon Taxation on Trade Patterns and Production Allocation in a CGE Framework
Reducing emissions in the freight sector is a key focus in China's pursuit of sustainability. Previous studies have not adequately addressed the complex interplay between freight activity, commodity movements, and geographical distances in evaluating mitigation policies. Here, we developed a new distance-based computable general equilibrium (CGE) model to address the freight costs between regions, enabling a detailed analysis of the spatial trade patterns, production relocation, and environmental impacts of different carbon tax scenarios on the freight sector. We found that a substantial carbon tax collection (700 CNY/ton CO2 by 2025) could reduce China's total freight turnover by 1.60% and cut industry-wide CO2 emission by approximately 200 million tons (accounting for 1.8% of total CO2 emissions in China). The response to freight carbon tax varies with distance: longer bilateral trade distances experience a sharper decline in freight volume, while shorter intra-provincial and neighboring interprovincial trade becomes more prosperous. Production activity tends to relocate to regions closer to customers and suppliers under the carbon tax, and each additional 1,000 km trade distance is associated with 0.3–1.2% reduction in provincial production. By integrating a spatial dimension into a CGE framework, our study elucidates how freight cost redistributes policy costs and benefits across regions, offering a more nuanced foundation for the design of targeted, regionally balanced carbon tax policies in China's freight decarbonization strategy.
期刊介绍:
Earth’s Future: A transdisciplinary open access journal, Earth’s Future focuses on the state of the Earth and the prediction of the planet’s future. By publishing peer-reviewed articles as well as editorials, essays, reviews, and commentaries, this journal will be the preeminent scholarly resource on the Anthropocene. It will also help assess the risks and opportunities associated with environmental changes and challenges.