电磁器件的磁弹性矢量迟滞建模:多尺度模型与基于能量的迟滞框架的结合

IF 1.9 3区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
K. Roppert;M. Kaltenbacher;L. Domenig;L. Daniel
{"title":"电磁器件的磁弹性矢量迟滞建模:多尺度模型与基于能量的迟滞框架的结合","authors":"K. Roppert;M. Kaltenbacher;L. Domenig;L. Daniel","doi":"10.1109/TMAG.2025.3584819","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this work, the simplified multiscale model (SMSM) is incorporated into the energy-based (EB) quasi-static vector hysteresis model to represent the anhysteretic part of the material behavior. This approach enables the inclusion of effects such as mechanical stress, magnetostriction, material anisotropy, and crystallographic texture. By integrating the anhysteretic model into the EB framework, it becomes possible to account for dissipative effects (in our case, domain wall pinning) while utilizing detailed material information. To solve the EB model in conjunction with the SMSM, two approaches are pursued: a numerical optimization of a free energy functional and an explicit approximate variant, known as the vector play model (VPM). Both methods are compared in terms of computational performance, and the differences in results are demonstrated through the simulation of the cross section of an electric machine. Furthermore, the local as well as global behavior is investigated. It is shown that in an electrical machine configuration, the VPM provides a very satisfactory approximation to both local and global responses, together with a reduced computation time compared to the EB model. In the provided application case, it is shown that a shrink-fitting operation can lead to a 30% increase in the overall hysteresis losses.","PeriodicalId":13405,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Magnetics","volume":"61 8","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=11062564","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Magnetoelastic Vector Hysteresis Modeling for Electromagnetic Devices: A Combination of a Multiscale Model With the Energy-Based Hysteresis Framework\",\"authors\":\"K. Roppert;M. Kaltenbacher;L. Domenig;L. Daniel\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TMAG.2025.3584819\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this work, the simplified multiscale model (SMSM) is incorporated into the energy-based (EB) quasi-static vector hysteresis model to represent the anhysteretic part of the material behavior. This approach enables the inclusion of effects such as mechanical stress, magnetostriction, material anisotropy, and crystallographic texture. By integrating the anhysteretic model into the EB framework, it becomes possible to account for dissipative effects (in our case, domain wall pinning) while utilizing detailed material information. To solve the EB model in conjunction with the SMSM, two approaches are pursued: a numerical optimization of a free energy functional and an explicit approximate variant, known as the vector play model (VPM). Both methods are compared in terms of computational performance, and the differences in results are demonstrated through the simulation of the cross section of an electric machine. Furthermore, the local as well as global behavior is investigated. It is shown that in an electrical machine configuration, the VPM provides a very satisfactory approximation to both local and global responses, together with a reduced computation time compared to the EB model. In the provided application case, it is shown that a shrink-fitting operation can lead to a 30% increase in the overall hysteresis losses.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13405,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Transactions on Magnetics\",\"volume\":\"61 8\",\"pages\":\"1-14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=11062564\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Transactions on Magnetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11062564/\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Magnetics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11062564/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这项工作中,简化的多尺度模型(SMSM)被纳入到基于能量(EB)的准静态矢量迟滞模型中,以表示材料行为的非迟滞部分。这种方法可以包含诸如机械应力、磁致伸缩、材料各向异性和晶体织构等效应。通过将非迟滞模型集成到EB框架中,在利用详细的材料信息时,可以考虑耗散效应(在我们的情况下,域壁钉住)。为了解决与SMSM结合的EB模型,采用了两种方法:一种是自由能泛函的数值优化,另一种是显式近似变体,称为矢量发挥模型(VPM)。两种方法在计算性能方面进行了比较,并通过对电机截面的模拟来证明结果的差异。此外,还研究了局部和全局行为。结果表明,在电机配置中,VPM对局部和全局响应都提供了非常满意的近似,并且与EB模型相比减少了计算时间。在提供的应用案例中,表明收缩拟合操作可导致总滞后损失增加30%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Magnetoelastic Vector Hysteresis Modeling for Electromagnetic Devices: A Combination of a Multiscale Model With the Energy-Based Hysteresis Framework
In this work, the simplified multiscale model (SMSM) is incorporated into the energy-based (EB) quasi-static vector hysteresis model to represent the anhysteretic part of the material behavior. This approach enables the inclusion of effects such as mechanical stress, magnetostriction, material anisotropy, and crystallographic texture. By integrating the anhysteretic model into the EB framework, it becomes possible to account for dissipative effects (in our case, domain wall pinning) while utilizing detailed material information. To solve the EB model in conjunction with the SMSM, two approaches are pursued: a numerical optimization of a free energy functional and an explicit approximate variant, known as the vector play model (VPM). Both methods are compared in terms of computational performance, and the differences in results are demonstrated through the simulation of the cross section of an electric machine. Furthermore, the local as well as global behavior is investigated. It is shown that in an electrical machine configuration, the VPM provides a very satisfactory approximation to both local and global responses, together with a reduced computation time compared to the EB model. In the provided application case, it is shown that a shrink-fitting operation can lead to a 30% increase in the overall hysteresis losses.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Magnetics
IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
14.30%
发文量
565
审稿时长
4.1 months
期刊介绍: Science and technology related to the basic physics and engineering of magnetism, magnetic materials, applied magnetics, magnetic devices, and magnetic data storage. The IEEE Transactions on Magnetics publishes scholarly articles of archival value as well as tutorial expositions and critical reviews of classical subjects and topics of current interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信