美国老年人的社会关系和临终质量:婚姻、亲属关系和网络关系的影响。

Kafayat Mahmoud, Deborah Carr
{"title":"美国老年人的社会关系和临终质量:婚姻、亲属关系和网络关系的影响。","authors":"Kafayat Mahmoud, Deborah Carr","doi":"10.1093/geronb/gbaf135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We examine marital status differences in recent decedents' end-of-life care and gender differences therein, and the role of other social ties (children, siblings, network members) in influencing the quality of end-of-life care.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Data are from 12 waves (2011-2022) of the National Health and Aging Trends Study. We use binomial and multinomial logistic regression to evaluate the effects of marital status and other social ties on ten distinct dimensions of care in the last month of life, reported by proxies of deceased study participants. Outcomes were overall quality of care; adequately treated breathing problems, pain, and sadness/anxiety; care coordination; decisions made with patient input; care concordant with patient wishes; informed about care; personal care needs met; and respectful treatment. Models were adjusted for sociodemographic, health, and proxy characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Divorced decedents fared poorly on multiple outcomes, being less likely than married or widowed persons to receive excellent care and to have personal care needs met. Divorced and widowed decedents were less likely to receive respectful treatment relative to married decedents. We found no significant gender differences in these patterns. Persons with more siblings and network members had superior pain management.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>. Our results offer modest support for marital control and compensatory frameworks; no particular social tie is uniformly protective at the end of life. Health care providers should help dying patients identify significant others who can best participate in end-of-life preparations and care. Hospital patient advocates could also aid those who lack close kin at the end of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":520811,"journal":{"name":"The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social Relationships and End-of-Life Quality among Older Adults in the United States: The Impacts of Marital, Kinship, and Network Ties.\",\"authors\":\"Kafayat Mahmoud, Deborah Carr\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/geronb/gbaf135\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We examine marital status differences in recent decedents' end-of-life care and gender differences therein, and the role of other social ties (children, siblings, network members) in influencing the quality of end-of-life care.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Data are from 12 waves (2011-2022) of the National Health and Aging Trends Study. We use binomial and multinomial logistic regression to evaluate the effects of marital status and other social ties on ten distinct dimensions of care in the last month of life, reported by proxies of deceased study participants. Outcomes were overall quality of care; adequately treated breathing problems, pain, and sadness/anxiety; care coordination; decisions made with patient input; care concordant with patient wishes; informed about care; personal care needs met; and respectful treatment. Models were adjusted for sociodemographic, health, and proxy characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Divorced decedents fared poorly on multiple outcomes, being less likely than married or widowed persons to receive excellent care and to have personal care needs met. Divorced and widowed decedents were less likely to receive respectful treatment relative to married decedents. We found no significant gender differences in these patterns. Persons with more siblings and network members had superior pain management.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>. Our results offer modest support for marital control and compensatory frameworks; no particular social tie is uniformly protective at the end of life. Health care providers should help dying patients identify significant others who can best participate in end-of-life preparations and care. Hospital patient advocates could also aid those who lack close kin at the end of life.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbaf135\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbaf135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们研究婚姻状况的差异和性别差异,以及其他社会关系(子女、兄弟姐妹、网络成员)在影响临终关怀质量中的作用。方法:数据来源于2011-2022年全国健康与老龄化趋势研究的12个阶段。我们使用二项和多项逻辑回归来评估婚姻状况和其他社会关系对生命最后一个月的十个不同维度的护理的影响,由已故研究参与者的代理报告。结果是总体护理质量;适当治疗呼吸问题、疼痛和悲伤/焦虑;护理协调;根据病人的意见作出决定;符合病人意愿的护理;了解护理情况;个人护理需求得到满足;尊重他人。根据社会人口统计学、健康和代理特征对模型进行了调整。结果:离婚的死者在多个结果上表现不佳,比已婚或丧偶的人更不可能得到良好的照顾和满足个人护理需求。与已婚的死者相比,离婚和丧偶的死者受到尊重的可能性更小。我们发现在这些模式中没有显著的性别差异。有更多兄弟姐妹和网络成员的人有更好的疼痛管理。讨论:。我们的研究结果为婚姻控制和补偿框架提供了适度的支持;在生命的尽头,没有特定的社会关系是一成不变的保护。卫生保健提供者应该帮助临终病人确定最能参与临终准备和护理的重要他人。医院病人的倡导者也可以帮助那些在生命结束时没有近亲的人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Social Relationships and End-of-Life Quality among Older Adults in the United States: The Impacts of Marital, Kinship, and Network Ties.

Objectives: We examine marital status differences in recent decedents' end-of-life care and gender differences therein, and the role of other social ties (children, siblings, network members) in influencing the quality of end-of-life care.

Method: Data are from 12 waves (2011-2022) of the National Health and Aging Trends Study. We use binomial and multinomial logistic regression to evaluate the effects of marital status and other social ties on ten distinct dimensions of care in the last month of life, reported by proxies of deceased study participants. Outcomes were overall quality of care; adequately treated breathing problems, pain, and sadness/anxiety; care coordination; decisions made with patient input; care concordant with patient wishes; informed about care; personal care needs met; and respectful treatment. Models were adjusted for sociodemographic, health, and proxy characteristics.

Results: Divorced decedents fared poorly on multiple outcomes, being less likely than married or widowed persons to receive excellent care and to have personal care needs met. Divorced and widowed decedents were less likely to receive respectful treatment relative to married decedents. We found no significant gender differences in these patterns. Persons with more siblings and network members had superior pain management.

Discussion: . Our results offer modest support for marital control and compensatory frameworks; no particular social tie is uniformly protective at the end of life. Health care providers should help dying patients identify significant others who can best participate in end-of-life preparations and care. Hospital patient advocates could also aid those who lack close kin at the end of life.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信