通过积极主动的社会工作者沟通来提高质量,以提高姑息治疗的可及性。

IF 4.6 3区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Ellis C Dillon, Amandeep Grewal, Su-Ying Liang, Harold Luft, Martina Li, Natalia Colocci, Steve Lai, Manali I Patel
{"title":"通过积极主动的社会工作者沟通来提高质量,以提高姑息治疗的可及性。","authors":"Ellis C Dillon, Amandeep Grewal, Su-Ying Liang, Harold Luft, Martina Li, Natalia Colocci, Steve Lai, Manali I Patel","doi":"10.1200/OP-25-00077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study evaluates a quality improvement project to improve access to specialty palliative care (PC) for individuals with advanced cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A California health care organization implemented a social worker (SW)-led program to improve education about, and referrals to, PC for patients with advanced cancer at one clinic (intervention site), whereas three control sites continued usual care. We used a rigorous intention-to-treat difference-in-difference analysis to detect whether the intervention increased PC referrals (primary outcome) at the intervention versus control sites while accounting for preimplementation trends. We used multivariable logistic and Poisson regressions to compare primary and exploratory outcomes (advance care planning and end-of-life outcomes: PC visits before death, acute care use within 30 days of death, and systemic therapy within 14 days of death) in the preimplementation and postimplementation period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analytic cohort included 555 patients (177 preimplementation, 378 postimplementation): 147 (26.5%) at the intervention site and 408 at control sites, with 312 (56.2%) deceased. At the intervention site postimplementation, 52 (51.5%) of 101 patients received the SW-led intervention. At the intervention site, PC referrals increased from 30.4% to 32.7% (<i>v</i> 26.7% to 25.3% at control sites). PC visits increased from 21.7% to 28.7% (<i>v</i> 21.4% to 22%), and among decedents, any PC visits increased from 53.1% to 75% (<i>v</i> 57% to 66.9%). In adjusted multivariable analyses, the only near-significant difference-in-difference PC effect was that decedents at the intervention site had higher odds of receiving PC before death (OR, 3.09 [95% CI, 0.89 to 10.67]; <i>P</i> = .07).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This SW-led intervention was not associated with significantly increased PC referrals. When translating evidence from trials to real-world quality improvement efforts, context and changes to the intervention may affect effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":14612,"journal":{"name":"JCO oncology practice","volume":" ","pages":"OP2500077"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality Improvement Effort With Proactive Social Worker Communication to Enhance Palliative Care Access.\",\"authors\":\"Ellis C Dillon, Amandeep Grewal, Su-Ying Liang, Harold Luft, Martina Li, Natalia Colocci, Steve Lai, Manali I Patel\",\"doi\":\"10.1200/OP-25-00077\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study evaluates a quality improvement project to improve access to specialty palliative care (PC) for individuals with advanced cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A California health care organization implemented a social worker (SW)-led program to improve education about, and referrals to, PC for patients with advanced cancer at one clinic (intervention site), whereas three control sites continued usual care. We used a rigorous intention-to-treat difference-in-difference analysis to detect whether the intervention increased PC referrals (primary outcome) at the intervention versus control sites while accounting for preimplementation trends. We used multivariable logistic and Poisson regressions to compare primary and exploratory outcomes (advance care planning and end-of-life outcomes: PC visits before death, acute care use within 30 days of death, and systemic therapy within 14 days of death) in the preimplementation and postimplementation period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analytic cohort included 555 patients (177 preimplementation, 378 postimplementation): 147 (26.5%) at the intervention site and 408 at control sites, with 312 (56.2%) deceased. At the intervention site postimplementation, 52 (51.5%) of 101 patients received the SW-led intervention. At the intervention site, PC referrals increased from 30.4% to 32.7% (<i>v</i> 26.7% to 25.3% at control sites). PC visits increased from 21.7% to 28.7% (<i>v</i> 21.4% to 22%), and among decedents, any PC visits increased from 53.1% to 75% (<i>v</i> 57% to 66.9%). In adjusted multivariable analyses, the only near-significant difference-in-difference PC effect was that decedents at the intervention site had higher odds of receiving PC before death (OR, 3.09 [95% CI, 0.89 to 10.67]; <i>P</i> = .07).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This SW-led intervention was not associated with significantly increased PC referrals. When translating evidence from trials to real-world quality improvement efforts, context and changes to the intervention may affect effectiveness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14612,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JCO oncology practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"OP2500077\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JCO oncology practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1200/OP-25-00077\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO oncology practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/OP-25-00077","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究评估了一个质量改进项目,以改善晚期癌症患者获得专业姑息治疗(PC)的机会。方法:加州一家卫生保健机构实施了一项社会工作者(SW)主导的计划,以改善在一个诊所(干预点)对晚期癌症患者的PC教育和转介,而三个对照点继续进行常规护理。我们使用了严格的意向治疗差异分析来检测干预是否增加了干预点与对照点的PC转诊(主要结局),同时考虑了实施前的趋势。我们使用多变量逻辑回归和泊松回归来比较实施前和实施后的主要结果和探索性结果(预先护理计划和生命终结结果:死亡前PC就诊,死亡后30天内急性护理使用,以及死亡后14天内全身治疗)。结果:分析队列包括555例患者(实施前177例,实施后378例):干预组147例(26.5%),对照组408例(56.2%),其中312例(56.2%)死亡。在实施干预后,101例患者中有52例(51.5%)接受了sw主导的干预。在干预点,PC转诊从30.4%增加到32.7%(对照点从26.7%增加到25.3%)。PC访问从21.7%增加到28.7% (v 21.4%到22%),在死者中,PC访问从53.1%增加到75% (v 57%到66.9%)。在调整后的多变量分析中,唯一接近显著差异的PC效应是,在干预地点的死者在死亡前接受PC的几率更高(OR, 3.09 [95% CI, 0.89至10.67];P = .07)。结论:这种由sw主导的干预与显著增加的PC转诊无关。当将试验证据转化为实际质量改进工作时,环境和干预措施的变化可能会影响有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quality Improvement Effort With Proactive Social Worker Communication to Enhance Palliative Care Access.

Purpose: This study evaluates a quality improvement project to improve access to specialty palliative care (PC) for individuals with advanced cancer.

Methods: A California health care organization implemented a social worker (SW)-led program to improve education about, and referrals to, PC for patients with advanced cancer at one clinic (intervention site), whereas three control sites continued usual care. We used a rigorous intention-to-treat difference-in-difference analysis to detect whether the intervention increased PC referrals (primary outcome) at the intervention versus control sites while accounting for preimplementation trends. We used multivariable logistic and Poisson regressions to compare primary and exploratory outcomes (advance care planning and end-of-life outcomes: PC visits before death, acute care use within 30 days of death, and systemic therapy within 14 days of death) in the preimplementation and postimplementation period.

Results: The analytic cohort included 555 patients (177 preimplementation, 378 postimplementation): 147 (26.5%) at the intervention site and 408 at control sites, with 312 (56.2%) deceased. At the intervention site postimplementation, 52 (51.5%) of 101 patients received the SW-led intervention. At the intervention site, PC referrals increased from 30.4% to 32.7% (v 26.7% to 25.3% at control sites). PC visits increased from 21.7% to 28.7% (v 21.4% to 22%), and among decedents, any PC visits increased from 53.1% to 75% (v 57% to 66.9%). In adjusted multivariable analyses, the only near-significant difference-in-difference PC effect was that decedents at the intervention site had higher odds of receiving PC before death (OR, 3.09 [95% CI, 0.89 to 10.67]; P = .07).

Conclusion: This SW-led intervention was not associated with significantly increased PC referrals. When translating evidence from trials to real-world quality improvement efforts, context and changes to the intervention may affect effectiveness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
518
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信