抗病性不同大豆品种杀菌剂使用的经济效益

IF 1.1 4区 农林科学 Q3 PLANT SCIENCES
Ricardo Gomes Tomáz, Cláudia Vieira Godoy, Emerson Medeiros Del Ponte
{"title":"抗病性不同大豆品种杀菌剂使用的经济效益","authors":"Ricardo Gomes Tomáz,&nbsp;Cláudia Vieira Godoy,&nbsp;Emerson Medeiros Del Ponte","doi":"10.1111/jph.70138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study investigated the economic viability of fungicide use in managing target spot disease, across soybean cultivars with varying tolerance levels. An extensive dataset was collected over 11 growing seasons (2012/2013 to 2022/2023) from 173 trials in six Brazilian states. A total of 56 soybean cultivars were classified into high, medium, and low tolerance categories based on the estimated relative damage coefficients (<i>α</i>) derived from linear regression models between yield and disease severity. Stochastic simulations, incorporating factors such as attainable yield, fungicide cost, and efficacy, were performed to estimate the probability of break-even on fungicide costs, the economic returns, and the economic damage thresholds (EDT) under scenarios of attainable yield and disease pressure scenarios. The results showed that low-tolerance cultivars (<i>α</i> = 1.0%/p.p [percentage point]) consistently achieved higher yield benefits (up to 2510 kg/ha) and profitability with fungicide applications, especially under scenarios of high disease pressure and high attainable yield. Conversely, high-tolerance cultivars (<i>α</i> = 0.2%/p.p) exhibited lower economic returns, greater resilience to declining fungicide efficacy over multiple seasons, and the highest EDT (10.1%). Medium-tolerance cultivars (<i>α</i> = 0.6%/p.p) showed intermediate outcomes in terms of profitability and yield difference. While low-tolerance cultivars benefit most from chemical interventions, high-tolerance cultivars offer a sustainable alternative by reducing reliance on fungicides. These findings provide valuable insights for decision-making in soybean disease management, emphasising the integration of cultivar selection and economic thresholds into targeted fungicide programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":16843,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Phytopathology","volume":"173 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jph.70138","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Economic Returns on Fungicide Use Across Soybean Cultivars With Varying Tolerance to Target Spot Caused by Corynespora cassiicola\",\"authors\":\"Ricardo Gomes Tomáz,&nbsp;Cláudia Vieira Godoy,&nbsp;Emerson Medeiros Del Ponte\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jph.70138\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study investigated the economic viability of fungicide use in managing target spot disease, across soybean cultivars with varying tolerance levels. An extensive dataset was collected over 11 growing seasons (2012/2013 to 2022/2023) from 173 trials in six Brazilian states. A total of 56 soybean cultivars were classified into high, medium, and low tolerance categories based on the estimated relative damage coefficients (<i>α</i>) derived from linear regression models between yield and disease severity. Stochastic simulations, incorporating factors such as attainable yield, fungicide cost, and efficacy, were performed to estimate the probability of break-even on fungicide costs, the economic returns, and the economic damage thresholds (EDT) under scenarios of attainable yield and disease pressure scenarios. The results showed that low-tolerance cultivars (<i>α</i> = 1.0%/p.p [percentage point]) consistently achieved higher yield benefits (up to 2510 kg/ha) and profitability with fungicide applications, especially under scenarios of high disease pressure and high attainable yield. Conversely, high-tolerance cultivars (<i>α</i> = 0.2%/p.p) exhibited lower economic returns, greater resilience to declining fungicide efficacy over multiple seasons, and the highest EDT (10.1%). Medium-tolerance cultivars (<i>α</i> = 0.6%/p.p) showed intermediate outcomes in terms of profitability and yield difference. While low-tolerance cultivars benefit most from chemical interventions, high-tolerance cultivars offer a sustainable alternative by reducing reliance on fungicides. These findings provide valuable insights for decision-making in soybean disease management, emphasising the integration of cultivar selection and economic thresholds into targeted fungicide programs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16843,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Phytopathology\",\"volume\":\"173 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jph.70138\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Phytopathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jph.70138\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PLANT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Phytopathology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jph.70138","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究在不同耐受性的大豆品种间调查了杀菌剂用于防治目标斑病的经济可行性。从巴西六个州的173个试验中收集了11个生长季节(2012/2013年至2022/2023年)的广泛数据集。根据产量与病害严重程度之间的线性回归模型估计的相对危害系数(α),将56个大豆品种分为高、中、低耐受性三类。采用随机模拟,结合可获得产量、杀菌剂成本和有效性等因素,估计可获得产量和疾病压力情景下杀菌剂成本盈亏平衡的概率、经济回报和经济损害阈值(EDT)。结果表明:低耐受性品种(α = 1.0%/p;(P[百分点])通过使用杀菌剂持续获得更高的产量效益(高达2510公斤/公顷)和盈利能力,特别是在高病害压力和高可达产量的情况下。相反,高耐受性品种(α = 0.2%/p.p)表现出较低的经济回报,对多季杀菌剂效果下降的抵御能力更强,EDT最高(10.1%)。中耐受性品种(α = 0.6%/p.p)在盈利能力和产量差异方面表现为中等结果。虽然低耐受性品种从化学干预中获益最多,但高耐受性品种通过减少对杀菌剂的依赖提供了可持续的替代方案。这些发现为大豆病害管理决策提供了有价值的见解,强调将品种选择和经济阈值整合到有针对性的杀菌剂计划中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Economic Returns on Fungicide Use Across Soybean Cultivars With Varying Tolerance to Target Spot Caused by Corynespora cassiicola

Economic Returns on Fungicide Use Across Soybean Cultivars With Varying Tolerance to Target Spot Caused by Corynespora cassiicola

This study investigated the economic viability of fungicide use in managing target spot disease, across soybean cultivars with varying tolerance levels. An extensive dataset was collected over 11 growing seasons (2012/2013 to 2022/2023) from 173 trials in six Brazilian states. A total of 56 soybean cultivars were classified into high, medium, and low tolerance categories based on the estimated relative damage coefficients (α) derived from linear regression models between yield and disease severity. Stochastic simulations, incorporating factors such as attainable yield, fungicide cost, and efficacy, were performed to estimate the probability of break-even on fungicide costs, the economic returns, and the economic damage thresholds (EDT) under scenarios of attainable yield and disease pressure scenarios. The results showed that low-tolerance cultivars (α = 1.0%/p.p [percentage point]) consistently achieved higher yield benefits (up to 2510 kg/ha) and profitability with fungicide applications, especially under scenarios of high disease pressure and high attainable yield. Conversely, high-tolerance cultivars (α = 0.2%/p.p) exhibited lower economic returns, greater resilience to declining fungicide efficacy over multiple seasons, and the highest EDT (10.1%). Medium-tolerance cultivars (α = 0.6%/p.p) showed intermediate outcomes in terms of profitability and yield difference. While low-tolerance cultivars benefit most from chemical interventions, high-tolerance cultivars offer a sustainable alternative by reducing reliance on fungicides. These findings provide valuable insights for decision-making in soybean disease management, emphasising the integration of cultivar selection and economic thresholds into targeted fungicide programs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Phytopathology
Journal of Phytopathology 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
88
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Phytopathology publishes original and review articles on all scientific aspects of applied phytopathology in agricultural and horticultural crops. Preference is given to contributions improving our understanding of the biotic and abiotic determinants of plant diseases, including epidemics and damage potential, as a basis for innovative disease management, modelling and forecasting. This includes practical aspects and the development of methods for disease diagnosis as well as infection bioassays. Studies at the population, organism, physiological, biochemical and molecular genetic level are welcome. The journal scope comprises the pathology and epidemiology of plant diseases caused by microbial pathogens, viruses and nematodes. Accepted papers should advance our conceptual knowledge of plant diseases, rather than presenting descriptive or screening data unrelated to phytopathological mechanisms or functions. Results from unrepeated experimental conditions or data with no or inappropriate statistical processing will not be considered. Authors are encouraged to look at past issues to ensure adherence to the standards of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信