{"title":"与阿米替林相比,度洛西汀对女性慢性盆腔疼痛综合征的耐受性和疗效:来自一项临床试验的发现","authors":"Maede Mohseni, Rojan Ghaderzadeh, Kimia Bakhtiari, Maryam Zamanirafe, Mona Doostizadeh, Aliasghar Tabatabaeii Mohammadi, Kiumarth Amini, Maryam Mehrpooya","doi":"10.1111/luts.70023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Duloxetine has demonstrated efficacy in treating various types of chronic pain conditions. A double-blind clinical trial was conducted to assess the effectiveness and tolerability of duloxetine compared to amitriptyline in women suffering from chronic pelvic pain (CPP) syndrome.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Sixty-nine eligible women diagnosed with CPP syndrome were randomly assigned to receive either duloxetine or amitriptyline. Duloxetine was initiated at 30 mg/day and amitriptyline at 25 mg/day, with dosages increased to 60 mg/day for duloxetine and 50 mg/day for amitriptyline after the first week and maintained throughout weeks 2 to 8 of the treatment phase. The effectiveness of the treatment was assessed using the National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI) and its domain scores at weeks 4 and 8 after treatment. The safety and tolerability of the study medications were assessed using an antidepressant side effect checklist and spontaneous participant reports of adverse effects. All analyses were conducted on an Intention-to-Treat (ITT) analysis data set.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Patients undergoing both medications experienced similar improvements in their total NIH-CPSI scores at weeks 4 and 8. The proportions of patients achieving a response, defined as at least a 6-point reduction in the total NIH-CPSI score at both weeks 4 and 8, were also comparable between the duloxetine and amitriptyline treatments. Further, at the end of the study period, a similar proportion of subjects reported marked or moderate overall symptom improvements with both treatments. However, in the analysis of NIH-CPSI domain scores, duloxetine-treated patients exhibited lower pain domain scores at both study endpoints, while amitriptyline-treated patients achieved better scores in the urinary symptoms domain. Regarding quality of life domain scores, no significant differences were observed between the groups. In terms of safety and tolerability, duloxetine demonstrated more favorable outcomes, with fewer patients experiencing adverse effects and a lower withdrawal rate due to adverse effects compared to amitriptyline.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>These findings suggest that duloxetine is as effective as amitriptyline for managing CPP syndrome in women, with the added advantage of a more favorable safety profile.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Trial Registration</h3>\n \n <p>The trial was registered at the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (identifier code: IRCT20120215009014N457). Registration date: 2023-01-10</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18028,"journal":{"name":"LUTS: Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms","volume":"17 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tolerability and Efficacy of Duloxetine Compared to Amitriptyline in Women With Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome: Findings From a Clinical Trial\",\"authors\":\"Maede Mohseni, Rojan Ghaderzadeh, Kimia Bakhtiari, Maryam Zamanirafe, Mona Doostizadeh, Aliasghar Tabatabaeii Mohammadi, Kiumarth Amini, Maryam Mehrpooya\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/luts.70023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>Duloxetine has demonstrated efficacy in treating various types of chronic pain conditions. A double-blind clinical trial was conducted to assess the effectiveness and tolerability of duloxetine compared to amitriptyline in women suffering from chronic pelvic pain (CPP) syndrome.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Sixty-nine eligible women diagnosed with CPP syndrome were randomly assigned to receive either duloxetine or amitriptyline. Duloxetine was initiated at 30 mg/day and amitriptyline at 25 mg/day, with dosages increased to 60 mg/day for duloxetine and 50 mg/day for amitriptyline after the first week and maintained throughout weeks 2 to 8 of the treatment phase. The effectiveness of the treatment was assessed using the National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI) and its domain scores at weeks 4 and 8 after treatment. The safety and tolerability of the study medications were assessed using an antidepressant side effect checklist and spontaneous participant reports of adverse effects. All analyses were conducted on an Intention-to-Treat (ITT) analysis data set.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Patients undergoing both medications experienced similar improvements in their total NIH-CPSI scores at weeks 4 and 8. The proportions of patients achieving a response, defined as at least a 6-point reduction in the total NIH-CPSI score at both weeks 4 and 8, were also comparable between the duloxetine and amitriptyline treatments. Further, at the end of the study period, a similar proportion of subjects reported marked or moderate overall symptom improvements with both treatments. However, in the analysis of NIH-CPSI domain scores, duloxetine-treated patients exhibited lower pain domain scores at both study endpoints, while amitriptyline-treated patients achieved better scores in the urinary symptoms domain. Regarding quality of life domain scores, no significant differences were observed between the groups. In terms of safety and tolerability, duloxetine demonstrated more favorable outcomes, with fewer patients experiencing adverse effects and a lower withdrawal rate due to adverse effects compared to amitriptyline.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>These findings suggest that duloxetine is as effective as amitriptyline for managing CPP syndrome in women, with the added advantage of a more favorable safety profile.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Trial Registration</h3>\\n \\n <p>The trial was registered at the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (identifier code: IRCT20120215009014N457). Registration date: 2023-01-10</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18028,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LUTS: Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms\",\"volume\":\"17 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LUTS: Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/luts.70023\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LUTS: Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/luts.70023","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Tolerability and Efficacy of Duloxetine Compared to Amitriptyline in Women With Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome: Findings From a Clinical Trial
Objectives
Duloxetine has demonstrated efficacy in treating various types of chronic pain conditions. A double-blind clinical trial was conducted to assess the effectiveness and tolerability of duloxetine compared to amitriptyline in women suffering from chronic pelvic pain (CPP) syndrome.
Methods
Sixty-nine eligible women diagnosed with CPP syndrome were randomly assigned to receive either duloxetine or amitriptyline. Duloxetine was initiated at 30 mg/day and amitriptyline at 25 mg/day, with dosages increased to 60 mg/day for duloxetine and 50 mg/day for amitriptyline after the first week and maintained throughout weeks 2 to 8 of the treatment phase. The effectiveness of the treatment was assessed using the National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI) and its domain scores at weeks 4 and 8 after treatment. The safety and tolerability of the study medications were assessed using an antidepressant side effect checklist and spontaneous participant reports of adverse effects. All analyses were conducted on an Intention-to-Treat (ITT) analysis data set.
Results
Patients undergoing both medications experienced similar improvements in their total NIH-CPSI scores at weeks 4 and 8. The proportions of patients achieving a response, defined as at least a 6-point reduction in the total NIH-CPSI score at both weeks 4 and 8, were also comparable between the duloxetine and amitriptyline treatments. Further, at the end of the study period, a similar proportion of subjects reported marked or moderate overall symptom improvements with both treatments. However, in the analysis of NIH-CPSI domain scores, duloxetine-treated patients exhibited lower pain domain scores at both study endpoints, while amitriptyline-treated patients achieved better scores in the urinary symptoms domain. Regarding quality of life domain scores, no significant differences were observed between the groups. In terms of safety and tolerability, duloxetine demonstrated more favorable outcomes, with fewer patients experiencing adverse effects and a lower withdrawal rate due to adverse effects compared to amitriptyline.
Conclusions
These findings suggest that duloxetine is as effective as amitriptyline for managing CPP syndrome in women, with the added advantage of a more favorable safety profile.
Trial Registration
The trial was registered at the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (identifier code: IRCT20120215009014N457). Registration date: 2023-01-10
期刊介绍:
LUTS is designed for the timely communication of peer-reviewed studies which provides new clinical and basic science information to physicians and researchers in the field of neurourology, urodynamics and urogynecology. Contributions are reviewed and selected by a group of distinguished referees from around the world, some of whom constitute the journal''s Editorial Board. The journal covers both basic and clinical research on lower urinary tract dysfunctions (LUTD), such as overactive bladder (OAB), detrusor underactivity, benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), bladder outlet obstruction (BOO), urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse (POP), painful bladder syndrome (PBS), as well as on other relevant conditions. Case reports are published only if new findings are provided.
LUTS is an official journal of the Japanese Continence Society, the Korean Continence Society, and the Taiwanese Continence Society. Submission of papers from all countries are welcome. LUTS has been accepted into Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) with a 2011 Impact Factor.