Nader Mankerious , Ralph Toelg , Mohammad Abdelghani , Hector M. Garcia-Garcia , Serdar Farhan , Abdelhakim Allali , Stephan Windecker , Thierry Lefèvre , Shigeru Saito , David E. Kandzari , Ron Waksman , Gert Richardt , Rayyan Hemetsberger
{"title":"冠状动脉扭曲对新一代药物活性支架植入结果的影响:BIOFLOW随机研究分析","authors":"Nader Mankerious , Ralph Toelg , Mohammad Abdelghani , Hector M. Garcia-Garcia , Serdar Farhan , Abdelhakim Allali , Stephan Windecker , Thierry Lefèvre , Shigeru Saito , David E. Kandzari , Ron Waksman , Gert Richardt , Rayyan Hemetsberger","doi":"10.1016/j.recesp.2024.12.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction and objectives</h3><div>Patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in vessels with moderate-to-severe tortuosity are at higher risk of adverse outcomes, but data are scarce in the era of newer-generation stents. We compared outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention in vessels with moderate-to-severe tortuosity using a bioresorbable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stent (BP-SES) vs a durable-polymer everolimus-eluting stent (DP-EES).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A total of 2350 patients from the BIOFLOW II, IV, and V randomized trials were stratified into 2 groups based on target-vessel tortuosity: none-to-mild and moderate-to-severe. The primary endpoints included target lesion failure (TLF)—a composite of cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction (TV-MI), or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR)—and probable/definite stent thrombosis at 3 years.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Patients with moderate-to-severe tortuosity (n<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->903) had more comorbidities than those with none-to-mild tortuosity (n<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1447). Rates of TLF (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.354), cardiac death (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.690), TLR (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.447), and stent thrombosis (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.084) were similar between the 2 groups, whereas TV-MI occurred more frequently in the moderate-to-severe tortuosity group (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.031). However, on multivariate analysis, moderate-to-severe tortuosity was not an independent predictor of TV-MI (adjusted HR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.72-1.55; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.772). Among patients with moderate-to-severe tortuosity, the use of BP-SES was associated with significantly lower rates of TLF compared with the DP-EES (7.8% vs 13.4%; HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.37-0.87; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.009), driven by reductions in TV-MI (5.0% vs 9.2%; HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.32-0.90; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.018) and TLR (2.7% vs 6.1%; HR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.23-0.90; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.021).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This pooled analysis of the randomized BIOFLOW trials demonstrates that patients with none-to-mild and moderate-to-severe tortuosity have comparable long-term adverse event rates. However, the use of BP-SES in patients with moderate-to-severe tortuosity may help mitigate potential ischemic risks.</div><div>Clinical trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov <span><span>NCT01356888</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>, <span><span>NCT01939249</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>, <span><span>NCT02389946</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21299,"journal":{"name":"Revista espanola de cardiologia","volume":"78 8","pages":"Pages 682-691"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impacto de la tortuosidad de las arterias coronarias en los resultados del implante de stent farmacoactivo de nueva generación: un análisis de los estudios aleatorizados BIOFLOW\",\"authors\":\"Nader Mankerious , Ralph Toelg , Mohammad Abdelghani , Hector M. Garcia-Garcia , Serdar Farhan , Abdelhakim Allali , Stephan Windecker , Thierry Lefèvre , Shigeru Saito , David E. Kandzari , Ron Waksman , Gert Richardt , Rayyan Hemetsberger\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.recesp.2024.12.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction and objectives</h3><div>Patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in vessels with moderate-to-severe tortuosity are at higher risk of adverse outcomes, but data are scarce in the era of newer-generation stents. We compared outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention in vessels with moderate-to-severe tortuosity using a bioresorbable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stent (BP-SES) vs a durable-polymer everolimus-eluting stent (DP-EES).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A total of 2350 patients from the BIOFLOW II, IV, and V randomized trials were stratified into 2 groups based on target-vessel tortuosity: none-to-mild and moderate-to-severe. The primary endpoints included target lesion failure (TLF)—a composite of cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction (TV-MI), or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR)—and probable/definite stent thrombosis at 3 years.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Patients with moderate-to-severe tortuosity (n<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->903) had more comorbidities than those with none-to-mild tortuosity (n<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1447). Rates of TLF (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.354), cardiac death (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.690), TLR (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.447), and stent thrombosis (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.084) were similar between the 2 groups, whereas TV-MI occurred more frequently in the moderate-to-severe tortuosity group (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.031). However, on multivariate analysis, moderate-to-severe tortuosity was not an independent predictor of TV-MI (adjusted HR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.72-1.55; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.772). Among patients with moderate-to-severe tortuosity, the use of BP-SES was associated with significantly lower rates of TLF compared with the DP-EES (7.8% vs 13.4%; HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.37-0.87; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.009), driven by reductions in TV-MI (5.0% vs 9.2%; HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.32-0.90; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.018) and TLR (2.7% vs 6.1%; HR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.23-0.90; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.021).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This pooled analysis of the randomized BIOFLOW trials demonstrates that patients with none-to-mild and moderate-to-severe tortuosity have comparable long-term adverse event rates. However, the use of BP-SES in patients with moderate-to-severe tortuosity may help mitigate potential ischemic risks.</div><div>Clinical trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov <span><span>NCT01356888</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>, <span><span>NCT01939249</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>, <span><span>NCT02389946</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21299,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista espanola de cardiologia\",\"volume\":\"78 8\",\"pages\":\"Pages 682-691\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista espanola de cardiologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0300893224005207\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista espanola de cardiologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0300893224005207","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Impacto de la tortuosidad de las arterias coronarias en los resultados del implante de stent farmacoactivo de nueva generación: un análisis de los estudios aleatorizados BIOFLOW
Introduction and objectives
Patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in vessels with moderate-to-severe tortuosity are at higher risk of adverse outcomes, but data are scarce in the era of newer-generation stents. We compared outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention in vessels with moderate-to-severe tortuosity using a bioresorbable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stent (BP-SES) vs a durable-polymer everolimus-eluting stent (DP-EES).
Methods
A total of 2350 patients from the BIOFLOW II, IV, and V randomized trials were stratified into 2 groups based on target-vessel tortuosity: none-to-mild and moderate-to-severe. The primary endpoints included target lesion failure (TLF)—a composite of cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction (TV-MI), or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR)—and probable/definite stent thrombosis at 3 years.
Results
Patients with moderate-to-severe tortuosity (n = 903) had more comorbidities than those with none-to-mild tortuosity (n = 1447). Rates of TLF (P = .354), cardiac death (P = .690), TLR (P = .447), and stent thrombosis (P = .084) were similar between the 2 groups, whereas TV-MI occurred more frequently in the moderate-to-severe tortuosity group (P = .031). However, on multivariate analysis, moderate-to-severe tortuosity was not an independent predictor of TV-MI (adjusted HR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.72-1.55; P = .772). Among patients with moderate-to-severe tortuosity, the use of BP-SES was associated with significantly lower rates of TLF compared with the DP-EES (7.8% vs 13.4%; HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.37-0.87; P = .009), driven by reductions in TV-MI (5.0% vs 9.2%; HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.32-0.90; P = .018) and TLR (2.7% vs 6.1%; HR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.23-0.90; P = .021).
Conclusions
This pooled analysis of the randomized BIOFLOW trials demonstrates that patients with none-to-mild and moderate-to-severe tortuosity have comparable long-term adverse event rates. However, the use of BP-SES in patients with moderate-to-severe tortuosity may help mitigate potential ischemic risks.
期刊介绍:
Revista Española de Cardiología, Revista bilingüe científica internacional, dedicada a las enfermedades cardiovasculares, es la publicación oficial de la Sociedad Española de Cardiología.