Yuzhu Liu, Maomin Chen, Ya Li, Liqi Wang, Aoyun Du, Yujia Lin, Shaohua Yi, Chao Xiao, Daixin Huang
{"title":"一个健壮的跨组织DNA甲基化模型,用于口腔样本的法医年龄估计","authors":"Yuzhu Liu, Maomin Chen, Ya Li, Liqi Wang, Aoyun Du, Yujia Lin, Shaohua Yi, Chao Xiao, Daixin Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.fsigen.2025.103331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>DNA methylation-based chronological age estimation is a powerful forensic tool, but its application to commonly encountered oral-derived samples (e.g., buccal swabs, saliva) is hampered by tissue specificity and inherent cellular heterogeneity, often leading to inaccurate predictions with existing models. This study aimed to overcome these limitations by developing and validating a robust cross-tissue DNA methylation model for forensic age estimation from such samples. We quantified DNA methylation at 18 CpG sites in 216 paired buccal swab and saliva samples (Han Chinese, 2–83 years) and systematically evaluated 32 model configurations—varying CpG marker panels, age transformation, and tissue variable inclusion—to identify markers with high cross-tissue stability and optimize predictive accuracy. An optimized 10-CpG quantile regression model achieved mean absolute errors (MAEs) of 3.19 years (buccal swabs), 3.44 years (saliva), and 3.45 years (combined dataset) in 10-fold cross-validation. Crucially, this model demonstrated excellent performance on an independent validation set of forensically relevant chewed gum samples (<em>n</em> = 25, aged 19–70 years; MAE = 3.29 years). The model also maintained reliable performance with bisulfite-converted DNA inputs as low as 5 ng and remained stable after 31 days of uncontrolled environmental storage. Our findings establish a methodologically sound and practically validated cross-tissue approach for forensic age estimation from diverse oral samples, offering a reliable solution to the challenges of tissue variability and cellular heterogeneity in real-world casework.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50435,"journal":{"name":"Forensic Science International-Genetics","volume":"80 ","pages":"Article 103331"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A robust cross-tissue DNA methylation model for forensic age estimation from oral samples\",\"authors\":\"Yuzhu Liu, Maomin Chen, Ya Li, Liqi Wang, Aoyun Du, Yujia Lin, Shaohua Yi, Chao Xiao, Daixin Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fsigen.2025.103331\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>DNA methylation-based chronological age estimation is a powerful forensic tool, but its application to commonly encountered oral-derived samples (e.g., buccal swabs, saliva) is hampered by tissue specificity and inherent cellular heterogeneity, often leading to inaccurate predictions with existing models. This study aimed to overcome these limitations by developing and validating a robust cross-tissue DNA methylation model for forensic age estimation from such samples. We quantified DNA methylation at 18 CpG sites in 216 paired buccal swab and saliva samples (Han Chinese, 2–83 years) and systematically evaluated 32 model configurations—varying CpG marker panels, age transformation, and tissue variable inclusion—to identify markers with high cross-tissue stability and optimize predictive accuracy. An optimized 10-CpG quantile regression model achieved mean absolute errors (MAEs) of 3.19 years (buccal swabs), 3.44 years (saliva), and 3.45 years (combined dataset) in 10-fold cross-validation. Crucially, this model demonstrated excellent performance on an independent validation set of forensically relevant chewed gum samples (<em>n</em> = 25, aged 19–70 years; MAE = 3.29 years). The model also maintained reliable performance with bisulfite-converted DNA inputs as low as 5 ng and remained stable after 31 days of uncontrolled environmental storage. Our findings establish a methodologically sound and practically validated cross-tissue approach for forensic age estimation from diverse oral samples, offering a reliable solution to the challenges of tissue variability and cellular heterogeneity in real-world casework.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50435,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forensic Science International-Genetics\",\"volume\":\"80 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103331\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forensic Science International-Genetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1872497325001115\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic Science International-Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1872497325001115","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
A robust cross-tissue DNA methylation model for forensic age estimation from oral samples
DNA methylation-based chronological age estimation is a powerful forensic tool, but its application to commonly encountered oral-derived samples (e.g., buccal swabs, saliva) is hampered by tissue specificity and inherent cellular heterogeneity, often leading to inaccurate predictions with existing models. This study aimed to overcome these limitations by developing and validating a robust cross-tissue DNA methylation model for forensic age estimation from such samples. We quantified DNA methylation at 18 CpG sites in 216 paired buccal swab and saliva samples (Han Chinese, 2–83 years) and systematically evaluated 32 model configurations—varying CpG marker panels, age transformation, and tissue variable inclusion—to identify markers with high cross-tissue stability and optimize predictive accuracy. An optimized 10-CpG quantile regression model achieved mean absolute errors (MAEs) of 3.19 years (buccal swabs), 3.44 years (saliva), and 3.45 years (combined dataset) in 10-fold cross-validation. Crucially, this model demonstrated excellent performance on an independent validation set of forensically relevant chewed gum samples (n = 25, aged 19–70 years; MAE = 3.29 years). The model also maintained reliable performance with bisulfite-converted DNA inputs as low as 5 ng and remained stable after 31 days of uncontrolled environmental storage. Our findings establish a methodologically sound and practically validated cross-tissue approach for forensic age estimation from diverse oral samples, offering a reliable solution to the challenges of tissue variability and cellular heterogeneity in real-world casework.
期刊介绍:
Forensic Science International: Genetics is the premier journal in the field of Forensic Genetics. This branch of Forensic Science can be defined as the application of genetics to human and non-human material (in the sense of a science with the purpose of studying inherited characteristics for the analysis of inter- and intra-specific variations in populations) for the resolution of legal conflicts.
The scope of the journal includes:
Forensic applications of human polymorphism.
Testing of paternity and other family relationships, immigration cases, typing of biological stains and tissues from criminal casework, identification of human remains by DNA testing methodologies.
Description of human polymorphisms of forensic interest, with special interest in DNA polymorphisms.
Autosomal DNA polymorphisms, mini- and microsatellites (or short tandem repeats, STRs), single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), X and Y chromosome polymorphisms, mtDNA polymorphisms, and any other type of DNA variation with potential forensic applications.
Non-human DNA polymorphisms for crime scene investigation.
Population genetics of human polymorphisms of forensic interest.
Population data, especially from DNA polymorphisms of interest for the solution of forensic problems.
DNA typing methodologies and strategies.
Biostatistical methods in forensic genetics.
Evaluation of DNA evidence in forensic problems (such as paternity or immigration cases, criminal casework, identification), classical and new statistical approaches.
Standards in forensic genetics.
Recommendations of regulatory bodies concerning methods, markers, interpretation or strategies or proposals for procedural or technical standards.
Quality control.
Quality control and quality assurance strategies, proficiency testing for DNA typing methodologies.
Criminal DNA databases.
Technical, legal and statistical issues.
General ethical and legal issues related to forensic genetics.