一般物质、反物质与抑郁症状：一项荟萃分析

IF 12.2 1区心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL

Clinical Psychology Review Pub Date : 2025-07-24 DOI:10.1016/j.cpr.2025.102626

Benedetta Tonini , Sara Bocci Benucci , Gordon Flett , Giulia Fioravanti , Silvia Casale

{"title":"一般物质、反物质与抑郁症状：一项荟萃分析","authors":"Benedetta Tonini , Sara Bocci Benucci , Gordon Flett , Giulia Fioravanti , Silvia Casale","doi":"10.1016/j.cpr.2025.102626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The concepts of mattering and anti-mattering have garnered increasing attention in recent years, especially in relation to psychological well-being. Mattering refers to the subjective sense that one is significant to others, while anti-mattering reflects feelings of being marginalized, insignificant, and invisible with respect to others. These constructs have been linked to mental health outcomes, particularly depressive symptoms. Therefore, the aim of the present meta-analysis is to examine the association between depressive symptoms and (i) general mattering and (ii) anti-mattering.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>A keyword-based systematic literature search was performed for eligible studies in which general mattering/anti-mattering and depressive symptoms were assessed. The meta-analysis was conducted following the most updated PRISMA guidelines.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Thirty-nine independent samples were included in quantitative analysis. Out of these, thirty-seven assessed the association between general mattering and depressive symptoms for a total of 24,397 participants (% Women = 48.09; mean age = 20.55 ± 17.24; range = 12.30–83.50) and sixteen explored the relationship between anti-mattering and depressive symptoms for a total of 9372 participants (% Women = 49.96 %; mean age = 23.62 ± 7.60; age range = 12.03–40.06). Meta-analytic results of the random effects model showed a significant negative correlation between general mattering and depressive symptoms <em>(Fisher's Z =</em> −0.41; <em>CI</em>: −0.47, −0.36; <em>Z</em> = 14.85<em>; p < 0.001)</em>) and a significant positive association between anti-mattering and depressive symptoms (<em>Fisher's Z</em> = 0.67; <em>CI:</em> 0.58, 0.76; <em>Z</em> = 14.95; <em>p</em> < 0.001). Anti-mattering exhibited a significantly stronger (positive) association with depressive symptoms compared to general mattering. Age did not moderate these associations, while gender did.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>These findings provide robust evidence for the significant relationship between both mattering and anti-mattering with depressive symptoms, also having important implications for both clinical interventions and future research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48458,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology Review","volume":"120 ","pages":"Article 102626"},"PeriodicalIF":12.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"General Mattering, Anti-mattering, and Depressive Symptoms: A Meta-Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Benedetta Tonini , Sara Bocci Benucci , Gordon Flett , Giulia Fioravanti , Silvia Casale\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cpr.2025.102626\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The concepts of mattering and anti-mattering have garnered increasing attention in recent years, especially in relation to psychological well-being. Mattering refers to the subjective sense that one is significant to others, while anti-mattering reflects feelings of being marginalized, insignificant, and invisible with respect to others. These constructs have been linked to mental health outcomes, particularly depressive symptoms. Therefore, the aim of the present meta-analysis is to examine the association between depressive symptoms and (i) general mattering and (ii) anti-mattering.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>A keyword-based systematic literature search was performed for eligible studies in which general mattering/anti-mattering and depressive symptoms were assessed. The meta-analysis was conducted following the most updated PRISMA guidelines.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Thirty-nine independent samples were included in quantitative analysis. Out of these, thirty-seven assessed the association between general mattering and depressive symptoms for a total of 24,397 participants (% Women = 48.09; mean age = 20.55 ± 17.24; range = 12.30–83.50) and sixteen explored the relationship between anti-mattering and depressive symptoms for a total of 9372 participants (% Women = 49.96 %; mean age = 23.62 ± 7.60; age range = 12.03–40.06). Meta-analytic results of the random effects model showed a significant negative correlation between general mattering and depressive symptoms <em>(Fisher's Z =</em> −0.41; <em>CI</em>: −0.47, −0.36; <em>Z</em> = 14.85<em>; p < 0.001)</em>) and a significant positive association between anti-mattering and depressive symptoms (<em>Fisher's Z</em> = 0.67; <em>CI:</em> 0.58, 0.76; <em>Z</em> = 14.95; <em>p</em> < 0.001). Anti-mattering exhibited a significantly stronger (positive) association with depressive symptoms compared to general mattering. Age did not moderate these associations, while gender did.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>These findings provide robust evidence for the significant relationship between both mattering and anti-mattering with depressive symptoms, also having important implications for both clinical interventions and future research.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48458,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Psychology Review\",\"volume\":\"120 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102626\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Psychology Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272735825000935\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272735825000935","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

物质和反物质的概念近年来受到越来越多的关注，特别是与心理健康有关。“重要”指的是对他人有重要意义的主观感觉，而“反重要”则是相对于他人被边缘化、无足轻重、被忽视的感觉。这些构造与心理健康结果，特别是抑郁症状有关。因此，本荟萃分析的目的是检查抑郁症状与(i)一般物质和（ii）反物质之间的关系。方法采用基于关键词的系统文献检索方法，对符合条件的研究进行一般性问题/反问题和抑郁症状评估。meta分析是按照最新的PRISMA指南进行的。结果纳入39份独立样本进行定量分析。其中，37项研究评估了24,397名参与者的一般问题与抑郁症状之间的关系(%女性= 48.09；平均年龄= 20.55±17.24；范围= 12.30-83.50)，16个研究了共9372名参与者的反物质与抑郁症状之间的关系(%女性= 49.96%；平均年龄= 23.62±7.60；年龄范围= 12.03-40.06)。随机效应模型的荟萃分析结果显示，一般物质与抑郁症状之间存在显著的负相关(Fisher’s Z = - 0.41；Ci:−0.47,−0.36；z = 14.85；p & lt;0.001))和反物质与抑郁症状之间的显著正相关(Fisher’s Z = 0.67；Ci: 0.58, 0.76；z = 14.95；p & lt;0.001)。与一般物质相比，反物质与抑郁症状表现出明显更强的（正）关联。年龄对这些关联没有调节作用，而性别有调节作用。这些研究结果为焦虑和反焦虑与抑郁症状之间的显著关系提供了有力的证据，也对临床干预和未来的研究具有重要意义。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

General Mattering, Anti-mattering, and Depressive Symptoms: A Meta-Analysis

Introduction

The concepts of mattering and anti-mattering have garnered increasing attention in recent years, especially in relation to psychological well-being. Mattering refers to the subjective sense that one is significant to others, while anti-mattering reflects feelings of being marginalized, insignificant, and invisible with respect to others. These constructs have been linked to mental health outcomes, particularly depressive symptoms. Therefore, the aim of the present meta-analysis is to examine the association between depressive symptoms and (i) general mattering and (ii) anti-mattering.

Method

A keyword-based systematic literature search was performed for eligible studies in which general mattering/anti-mattering and depressive symptoms were assessed. The meta-analysis was conducted following the most updated PRISMA guidelines.

Results

Thirty-nine independent samples were included in quantitative analysis. Out of these, thirty-seven assessed the association between general mattering and depressive symptoms for a total of 24,397 participants (% Women = 48.09; mean age = 20.55 ± 17.24; range = 12.30–83.50) and sixteen explored the relationship between anti-mattering and depressive symptoms for a total of 9372 participants (% Women = 49.96 %; mean age = 23.62 ± 7.60; age range = 12.03–40.06). Meta-analytic results of the random effects model showed a significant negative correlation between general mattering and depressive symptoms (Fisher's Z = −0.41; CI: −0.47, −0.36; Z = 14.85; p < 0.001)) and a significant positive association between anti-mattering and depressive symptoms (Fisher's Z = 0.67; CI: 0.58, 0.76; Z = 14.95; p < 0.001). Anti-mattering exhibited a significantly stronger (positive) association with depressive symptoms compared to general mattering. Age did not moderate these associations, while gender did.

Discussion

These findings provide robust evidence for the significant relationship between both mattering and anti-mattering with depressive symptoms, also having important implications for both clinical interventions and future research.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Clinical Psychology Review PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-

CiteScore

23.10

自引率

1.60%

发文量

期刊介绍： Clinical Psychology Review serves as a platform for substantial reviews addressing pertinent topics in clinical psychology. Encompassing a spectrum of issues, from psychopathology to behavior therapy, cognition to cognitive therapies, behavioral medicine to community mental health, assessment, and child development, the journal seeks cutting-edge papers that significantly contribute to advancing the science and/or practice of clinical psychology. While maintaining a primary focus on topics directly related to clinical psychology, the journal occasionally features reviews on psychophysiology, learning therapy, experimental psychopathology, and social psychology, provided they demonstrate a clear connection to research or practice in clinical psychology. Integrative literature reviews and summaries of innovative ongoing clinical research programs find a place within its pages. However, reports on individual research studies and theoretical treatises or clinical guides lacking an empirical base are deemed inappropriate for publication.